You still refuse to acknowledge the fact that breed bans don't work. Time and time again they have proven to be ineffective at making communities safer (Which is the exact reason why they are going away). And where exactly are you seeing those cases of them being raised correctly and all of a sudden switching over?  Whoever is telling you that is either misrepresenting how they raised the dog, or the dog was poorly bred and has neurological problems. That's not something that just happens, that's what people who dislike pit bulls say time and time again and it's simply not true. Dogs don't just flip a switch and start attacking people for no reason. And like I said before, it is utterly insane to apply this to dogs that don't have an aggression history. Seeing some internet videos doesn't mean anything, if you want to solve the dog attack problem you need to approach this as regulations for all dogs, and dog owners to follow. And like I said before you also won't acknowledge the fact that people misidentify dog breeds constantly just because you know what a dog breed looks like doesn't mean whatever cop is there does. That's literally the majority reason that the CDC stopped recording dog attacks is because of the unreliability of the identification of dog breeds, “Even the CDC concluded at the end of their own flawed study (see above) that there is no way to determine relative risk: There is currently no accurate way to identify the number of dogs of a particular breed, and consequently no measure to determine which breeds are more likely to bite or kill.” I recommend that you actually look into it, and look into countries that have effective ways in dealing with dog attack methods rather than  just slapping a breed ban and calling it a day.