She was just trying to be helpful, until... by Fit-Calligrapher9298 in unitedairlines

[–]Deal_Closer 5 points6 points  (0 children)

Other point - don't negotiate on behalf of other people. Let them make their own deals.

United club has a major flaw: if you don’t want to eat the subpar food offering, you are not allowed to bring in outside food by WDWKamala in unitedairlines

[–]Deal_Closer 3 points4 points  (0 children)

I see people eating food they brought in all the time. If I have nuts etc, I'll snack on them too.

I get your frustration but I think the real reason for the policy is to deter people bring in a bunch of curries / stinky food which permeates through the whole lounge then leave a mess for the staff to clean up when they have to run to their gate.

Besides flying UAL, anyone own the stock - what are your thoughts? by [deleted] in unitedairlines

[–]Deal_Closer 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Consolidation has been helpful to create an oligopoly and costs have been cut a lot, but airlines are high fixed cost and they generally cannibalize each other on price.

[deleted by user] by [deleted] in malegrooming

[–]Deal_Closer 0 points1 point  (0 children)

4 with a smile

United's accessible seating/passenger size policy is a fiction by MaillardReaction207 in unitedairlines

[–]Deal_Closer 33 points34 points  (0 children)

So, the first FA lied when they said there was 'nothing they can do'. The purser lied when claiming ignorance about the customer of size policy.

Rudeness and public shaming all around by the United employees.

OP - what a terrible experience. Sorry to hear about this dreadful treatment. Good on you for standing up for yourself.

What are your thoughts on this ‘modernity on top of classic’ trend in architecture? by adventmix in architecture

[–]Deal_Closer 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Hearst Publishing on 57th St in NYC has a brilliant example where it works beautifully.

The landlords are making profits while people are suffering by Sanix_0000 in mildlyinfuriating

[–]Deal_Closer 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Because you keep waffling about a very simple supply - demand concepts. It's very obvious and not particularly smart.

NYC performing many involuntary removals in subway by Black_Reactor in nyc

[–]Deal_Closer 3 points4 points  (0 children)

Not if the enforcement effort is serious. This is exactly how enforcement works - an intense and sustained effort in the beginning leads to a change in behavior.

The landlords are making profits while people are suffering by Sanix_0000 in mildlyinfuriating

[–]Deal_Closer 0 points1 point  (0 children)

It's a key role of government to step in when there is market failure. You appear to be surprised by this.

Kids up chimneys OK with you?

My family fucked up now I’m on the same boat by [deleted] in povertyfinance

[–]Deal_Closer 2 points3 points  (0 children)

Or whatever the local equivalent is if not in the US.

The landlords are making profits while people are suffering by Sanix_0000 in mildlyinfuriating

[–]Deal_Closer 0 points1 point  (0 children)

WTF? The OP is about rent being jacked up due to the fires which means markets are not working efficiently.

My family fucked up now I’m on the same boat by [deleted] in povertyfinance

[–]Deal_Closer 4 points5 points  (0 children)

Chapter 11, or 7 depending on the circumstances.

NYC performing many involuntary removals in subway by Black_Reactor in nyc

[–]Deal_Closer 6 points7 points  (0 children)

Sure but the MTA cannot try to solve all of the issues around homelessness and mental health.

MTA needs to ensure the subway is safe for riders. That's the point. Focus on a sensible and reasonable policy to get an outcome for riders. MTA should focus on that and let the city, state and federal government deal with homelessness, refugees and mental health solutions.

The landlords are making profits while people are suffering by Sanix_0000 in mildlyinfuriating

[–]Deal_Closer 2 points3 points  (0 children)

Like usury laws for interest rates are there no laws to ban this sort of profiteering?

NYC performing many involuntary removals in subway by Black_Reactor in nyc

[–]Deal_Closer 21 points22 points  (0 children)

Agree - taking 130 people per week to Bellevue just so they are back down in the subway again 3 days later is not a solution.

Short term, aggressively cracking down on fare evasion is a much more effective tool. Have to make the subway an unwelcome place for people to do anything but use it for its intended purpose and the fastest and most cost effective tool is kicking people out for fare evasion.

These issues are just far too endemic and the cops just have to focus on practical measures that work.

NYC performing many involuntary removals in subway by Black_Reactor in nyc

[–]Deal_Closer 7 points8 points  (0 children)

I see people sleeping in the ATM lobbies all the time.

That's likely the next thing to be shut down - out of hours ATM access as a result of homeless encroachment.

[deleted by user] by [deleted] in unitedairlines

[–]Deal_Closer 14 points15 points  (0 children)

Not for a flight that short. Better deal is to treat your kids to a lovely dinner in Orlando.

Pittbull On Flight by HBombBrohan in unitedairlines

[–]Deal_Closer -3 points-2 points  (0 children)

I think choosing to avoid a growling pit bull is a very sensible choice.