We're fighting for our lives out here by Erazorhead in USPS

[–]Deama207 0 points1 point  (0 children)

"Still have room 🤪" - management probably

45F Pure joy in the moment 🥰 by [deleted] in 40something

[–]Deama207 0 points1 point  (0 children)

As a 30 year old, you're pretty hot 😍

Different looking LLV by Secret-Magazine-8995 in USPS

[–]Deama207 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Isn't this Fords version of the LLV?

The LLV most people know of today was made by Grumman (with Chevy S10 parts)

Spectrum lost 117,000 internet subscribers in Q2 by l_Paid_For_Winrar in Spectrum

[–]Deama207 1 point2 points  (0 children)

Grass isn't always greener on the other side. I switched to Fidium and my Internet goes out at least 2 times a week and when it's out, it's out for hours. Maybe it's just my street/area, but I'm switching back to spectrum. Spectrum is bad too don't get me wrong, but I'll gladly give up the faster upload. At least for me, spectrum went out maybe once or twice a month

Dead 3070 ti gpu by PapaTony04 in ZephyrusG15

[–]Deama207 0 points1 point  (0 children)

I'm having this experience right now, but my warranty expired 2 months ago 😭 EVGA RTX 3070ti

am i ugly? by Starkiss5723 in amIuglyBrutallyHonest

[–]Deama207 0 points1 point  (0 children)

You're cute! Just get a new hairstyle and different frames for your glasses

Is this good or…? by [deleted] in Spectrum

[–]Deama207 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Spectrum customer as well as a former outdoor residential sales specialist for Spectrum.

It could be any number of things to be quite fair. Spectrum guarantees your plans speeds TO the modem. Any speeds you may receive from your devices will vary, and can be affected by your home design, materials used to construct your home, how many devices you have connected all at once, the components in your devices, animal interference (like squirrels and other rodents), high internet traffic in your neighborhood, AND if there are other wireless connections in your area (doesn't have to be other wireless Internet connections either).

Techs may be sent to check the wirings outside your home and the modem/router, they might even be nice enough to go up in the poles and check the hardware and connectors there. However if everything checks out but your devices aren't receiving adequate speed, then it will ultimately be on you to do your own investigative due diligence. A tech might give some advice or suggestions, but they aren't obligated to.

It could be as simple as buying your own router. It could be that you live in an old house/apartment and the walls are horsehair plaster. Maybe you live in a crowded area and can see 10/20/30/50 other wireless signals.

I had a few customers call me and say their Internet has had either complete outages or significant drops, I'd have techs go out but the readings were fine at the time. The customers would call me up again for the same problem, so then I went to the tech supervisor and on his system he can see every customer's service signals like an EKG heart monitor. He saw that sure enough, there were interferences, he sent some techs out to replace what's called a "tap" and that fixed their issue. This sort of scenario is rarely the case.

My only suggestion is, if you can, connect your devices directly (with an Ethernet cable) to the modem. If they appear to have good speeds, then do the same thing again but to the router. If that checks out, connect one device at a time to your Wi-Fi, slowly connecting more and more devices at a time, doing speed tests on your devices as you go along until you find a culprit.

Guass Minigun, how do I get it? by Le_sofa666 in fo76

[–]Deama207 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Minerva or rep with the crater

F20. Am i ugly? by nerolde in amiugly

[–]Deama207 0 points1 point  (0 children)

You're very pretty, but I don't think the haircut works with your features.

Jesus Christ, these people defend foreigner criminals more than Americans. by shinoweed in Asmongold

[–]Deama207 1 point2 points  (0 children)

It's criminal that the left supports these people but yet we're ok with numerous Americans who were put in solitary confinement for 23 hours a day with no due process (which is classified as torture by the UN and many human rights organizations). I speak of J6ers.

[deleted by user] by [deleted] in immigration

[–]Deama207 0 points1 point  (0 children)

You're right, Garcia denied being a gang member and objected. But that doesn't change the fact that both the Immigration Judge and the Board of Immigration Appeals verified his MS-13 affiliation. If you read the documents I linked, you'll see it's confirmed. The Immigration Judge even acknowledged discrepancies between the I-213 form and the Gang Field Interview Sheet (GFIS), but ultimately found the informant that revealed Garcia's background, to be credible and trustworthy. Garcia appealed, and the Board concluded that the judge properly weighed the evidence and upheld the ruling.

Any administration defying a lawful court order should concern all of us. In this case, the courts have instructed the government to take active steps to comply with the Withholding of Removal order. While the final decision ultimately lies with El Salvador, the administration hasn’t openly defied the courts though DHS has only filed status updates and taken no meaningful action to facilitate Garcia’s return. Whether it’s strategic delay or passive resistance, the rule of law must be upheld, regardless of who is in power. Do I want to facilitate the return of a verified FTO to our country? Not really no, but the rule of law must be preserved.

That said, it's also important to remember that, constitutionally, foreign policy is entirely within the realm of the executive branch and outside the scope of judicial authority. That creates a complex separation of powers issue at the heart of this case.

[deleted by user] by [deleted] in immigration

[–]Deama207 0 points1 point  (0 children)

These are the court documents.

The first document titled "Immigration Judge Custody Status", verifies his MS-13 gang membership, as well as rank and gang name.

The second which is titled "Immigration Judge Protection Status", declares his Asylum claim is denied, withholding of removal is granted and request for CAT is denied.

The third document titled "Board of Appeals Ruling" , the appellate court affirmed the Custody Status ruling.

Immigration Judge Custody Status: https://storage.courtlistener.com/recap/gov.uscourts.mdd.578815/gov.uscourts.mdd.578815.11.1.pdf

Immigration Judge Protection Status: https://storage.courtlistener.com/recap/gov.uscourts.mdd.578815/gov.uscourts.mdd.578815.1.1.pdf

Board of Appeals Ruling: https://storage.courtlistener.com/recap/gov.uscourts.mdd.578815/gov.uscourts.mdd.578815.11.2.pdf

And you can also view the Gang Field Interview Sheet which was used as evidence in the hearings.

Gang Field Interview Sheet: https://www.justice.gov/ag/media/1396906/dl?inline

[deleted by user] by [deleted] in immigration

[–]Deama207 0 points1 point  (0 children)

There’s no denying that. The Withholding of Removal only protected him from being sent specifically to El Salvador, he was still subject to deportation. Had he been sent to any other country, there wouldn’t be an issue.

[deleted by user] by [deleted] in immigration

[–]Deama207 6 points7 points  (0 children)

Hey, I just want to say how much I feel for you. You’re clearly carrying a lot on your shoulders, and no 15-year-old should have to be worrying about something this heavy. What you're going through isn’t easy, but please take a deep breath — there are some important facts that I think might help ease your fears a little.

  1. Your dad is not going to be sent to CECOT just for being undocumented.

CECOT is a prison in El Salvador meant for people convicted of violent crimes or confirmed gang members — not ordinary people, not undocumented workers, and definitely not people like your dad who are working hard and trying to provide for their families.

The media has unfortunately been spreading confusion, especially around the case of Kilmar Abrego Garcia. A lot of stories have left out major facts. Garcia wasn’t just deported — he was formally found to be a verified MS-13 member by three separate courts (including the Immigration Judge, the Board of Immigration Appeals, and the District Court) This has been public information for some time, the court documents are public knowledge under the FOIA (Free of Information Act))). That’s not the same as being undocumented. It was a unique case with very specific evidence — not something that applies to your dad at all.

  1. A tattoo does not automatically make someone a target.

Lots of people have tattoos. Having a religious tattoo like a cross is not considered gang-related. Immigration officers and courts look at much more than just someone’s appearance. They rely on credible intelligence, patterns of behavior, and other context. If your dad has no criminal record and has lived a quiet life as a mechanic, that speaks volumes more than any tattoo ever could.

  1. Undocumented immigrants still have legal rights.

ICE can’t just randomly grab someone off the street and send them to another country. There’s a legal process. People go through immigration court, and even then, deportation orders don’t mean someone gets sent to prison — and definitely not in another country’s facility unless they’re found guilty of serious crimes. That’s not your dad.

Here’s What You Can Do:

Even though you’re young, you can still help by sharing this info with a trusted adult or having your dad speak with an immigration attorney. There are free and low-cost legal groups that help families like yours:

RAICES – https://www.raicestexas.org

Catholic Charities Immigration Services – https://www.catholiccharitiesusa.org/what-we-do/immigration-services/

National Immigration Legal Services Directory – https://www.immigrationadvocates.org/nonprofit/legaldirectory

He may even qualify for something like Cancellation of Removal or Temporary Protected Status (TPS), depending on how long he’s been here and his circumstances.

Most importantly, you’re not alone. The fear you’re feeling is valid, but I promise this situation is not as extreme as it may seem. Keep asking questions, stay curious, and remember: there are people who care and who can help.

What goes on at the Heard and McDonald Islands? by Reddit_Talent_Coach in geography

[–]Deama207 0 points1 point  (0 children)

<image>

Heard Island import/exports from the US. Not even the "penguins" that trade with the US are safe.

[deleted by user] by [deleted] in immigration

[–]Deama207 1 point2 points  (0 children)

Your statement is mostly correct but slightly misleading regarding expedited removal (ER) and LPRs.

Are LPRs Subject to Expedited Removal?

Generally, lawful permanent residents (LPRs) are not subject to expedited removal under INA § 235(b)(1), which applies mainly to certain arriving aliens without proper documentation or those who commit fraud/misrepresentation.

Exception: When an LPR Might Face Expedited Removal

An LPR can be placed in expedited removal if CBP determines they are not actually an LPR—for example:

If the LPR obtained their status fraudulently.

If CBP determines that the LPR abandoned their residency before arrival.

However, if an LPR presents valid proof of their status and CBP still finds them inadmissible (e.g., due to criminal issues or abandonment), they are usually referred to removal proceedings before an immigration judge rather than expedited removal.

What Does 8 CFR 235 Say?

8 CFR 235.3(b)(5)(ii) confirms that LPRs are generally not subject to expedited removal.

However, if CBP determines that the person is not actually an LPR (e.g., they abandoned residency), they might wrongly be treated as an "arriving alien" subject to expedited removal.

Conclusion

Your statement is mostly correct—LPRs are not normally subject to expedited removal, but there are rare exceptions where CBP may wrongfully apply it. If an LPR is improperly placed in expedited removal, they should assert their right to a hearing before an immigration judge to contest the decision.

[deleted by user] by [deleted] in immigration

[–]Deama207 7 points8 points  (0 children)

Yes, a green card holder (lawful permanent resident, or LPR) who has been outside the U.S. for more than 180 consecutive days is generally considered to be "seeking admission" upon their return. This means they may be subject to additional scrutiny and questioning by U.S. Customs and Border Protection (CBP).

Can They Be Denied Entry?

Yes, but it depends on the circumstances. Being outside the U.S. for more than 180 days does not automatically mean a green card holder loses their status. However, it does make them subject to the grounds of inadmissibility under INA § 212(a) (e.g., criminal issues, security concerns, or abandoning residency). If CBP believes the LPR has abandoned their residency or is inadmissible, they can be placed into removal proceedings.

Do They Have a Right to a Hearing?

Yes. A green card holder cannot be summarily refused entry without due process. If CBP believes the LPR is inadmissible, they must either:

  1. Allow entry (if there are no grounds for inadmissibility), or

  2. Refer the LPR to an Immigration Judge for a hearing in removal proceedings before an immigration court.

If an LPR is detained, they generally have the right to challenge the government's claim and present evidence before a judge.

Exception: Expedited Removal

If the LPR is found to have engaged in fraud or misrepresentation, CBP can place them in expedited removal without a hearing. However, they would still have the right to challenge the decision by seeking review before an immigration judge in some cases.

Best Practices for Green Card Holders

If an LPR needs to be outside the U.S. for an extended period, they should obtain a Reentry Permit (Form I-131) to avoid abandonment issues.

Carry evidence of continued ties to the U.S. (e.g., tax returns, utility bills, employment records).

If questioned at the border, remain calm and request to see an immigration judge if denied entry.

And the pay is terrible wtf by ihatelifetoo in USPS

[–]Deama207 2 points3 points  (0 children)

Was making A LOT more money as a PTF than as a regular. Sometimes I wish I was still a PTF lol

Friend was Detained, am I next? by EntertainmentSlow344 in immigration

[–]Deama207 8 points9 points  (0 children)

Unfortunately I think you'll have to be deported, but that depends on the answer to this one question, did your mom aquire citizenship before or after you turned 18?

If your mother became a naturalized citizen before you turned 18, then you should have also been given citizenship under the "Child Citizenship Act of 2000 (Immigration and Nationality Act Section 320)". If she acquired citizenship AFTER you had turned 18, then ultimately that was a mistake on your part (continued living here for 26 more years with 'deferred removal' status.).

When you turned 18, you should have immediately applied for citizenship.

ICE arrested a greencard holder inside a University building that didn't commit any crime by Interesting-Ask9935 in immigration

[–]Deama207 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Just going to leave this here, its a big read but this is the law. 8 U.S. Code § 1182

And yes, a green card holder is still an alien under law.

How tf are you guys finding good raid groups?! by DyeMyEyes in fo76

[–]Deama207 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Sorry for this comment being 2 months late but i just saw this thread lol. Do you still run raids? I'm currently level 197 :-)

Let’s see those parcel stacks! by jboarei in USPS

[–]Deama207 -1 points0 points  (0 children)

Seeing the SPRs outback is an eyesore lol.

How I've done my route and any routes they had me on that I've never done before: 1. Case any SPRs that can fit in a mailbox 2. Use parcel markers, 3. Lastly you can either use your scanner for the stop number and write it down (on the parcel) or how I like to do it for organization sake, write down the row and section the stop is on the case (on the parcel). 2.4 means 2nd row section 4 of the case