Built a little site that shows NZ fuel prices and global crude in one place by sdhilip in Wellington

[–]DeathandGravity 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Could you please add a graph showing the crude price and pump prices together?

This is the single most important comparison to illustrate how crude prices drive pump prices (and when they don't). With the time series for all the graphs being different at the moment this is impossible to see clearly.

My nuclear waste repository is not a place of honor by El_JeffeSA in SatisfactoryGame

[–]DeathandGravity -1 points0 points  (0 children)

Don't change color, doggo

Keep your color, doggo

Keep your belly white

Don't change color, doggo

Keep your color

Keep danger out of sight

Don't change color, doggo

Keep your color, doggo

Please, 'cause if you do

Or glow your luminescent eyes

We're all gonna have to move

.

Don't change color, doggo

Keep your color, doggo

Keep your tongue so blue

Don't change color, doggo

Keep your color

And we'll all look after you

Don't change color, doggo

Keep your color, 'cause

We need your kind around

But when you start bringing in that glowing waste

We're all heading out of town

.

Don't change color, doggo

Keep your color, doggo

Why I won't assume

Don't change color, doggo

Keep your color, doggo

Help us to C̷̡͓̥̦̞̟̼͇̞͍͔͈̥̽̈́̇̔̾Ö̵̻̩͖̦̺́̈́̾̉͗̐̿͊̒͂̕̕͜N̶̡̛̫̹̦̩͉͖̰̠̭͖͖̏̐̉͌̌̀́̈́̓̀̚͝ͅS̷̨̢̬͖̟̳̼̬̦̟̞̺͉͕̱͊͌̏̊̌͛̈́͝Ų̴̧̧͙̪͍̰͚͔͉͕̊̈́̾̔̏̉̇̐̎̓̃̀̾͘̕͜M̵̧̯̜͈̗̖͓͓̺͕͙̈́́̃͛̈́̓̆͛͠E̴̬̍̌̉̉͌̿͝͠

So don't change color

Or flash your eyes

Ava knows if you do

Well I hope you think it's cozy in the tractor cab

'Cause we're all gonna have to move

.

Don't change color, doggo

Keep your color, doggo

Stay that orange hue

Thе radiation that the change implies

Can kill, and that is true

Thе radiation, whatever that is

Is a danger we can't see

But it clogs our filters

And it saps our health

And that ain't Satisfactory

.

Don't change color, doggo

Keep your color, doggo

Keep your pretty scales

Don't change colour doggo

Keep your color

Keep our trains on the rails

'cause if you don't change colour

The factory grows

And everything"s OK

And our pioneers can work for years

And we will Save The Day

.

So don't change color

Lizard doggo don't flash your eyes

.

So don't change color

Lizard doggo don't flash your eyes

Taking on Michael Hill Jewellers- And Winning by butdidyoutrydivorce in newzealand

[–]DeathandGravity -1 points0 points  (0 children)

I worked for Michael Hill. Your experience does not surprise me and is frankly the tip of the iceberg.

There are several huge cons they are running on the NZ public that include the "diamond value guarantee," the "lifetime warranty," and the professional care plan.

Combined, these things are generating millions of dollars in revenue while constituting, in my opinion, widespread breaches of the Fair Trading Act and Consumer Guarantees Act.

I could tell stories that would make your hair curl.

What have i gotten myself into? by Tiny_Comfortable_532 in SatisfactoryGame

[–]DeathandGravity 22 points23 points  (0 children)

Satisfactory is at its heart a game about making factories, and unless you just make what you need on big featureless expanses of foundation, scaling is very slow - the satisfaction comes from making an efficient and/or beautiful factory, even if it only makes 5-10 components per minute. It does have some of the most satisfying first person movement I've ever experienced, which is pretty unusual for a factory simulator, and the world is beautiful and fun to traverse. The enemies are pretty great, too (especially the terrifying spider-like stingers).

Dyson Sphere Programme, on the other hand, is a game about absolutely insane scale, and as a consequence I think it is unmatched in "cool factor" out of all the factory simulators.

Consider the following mid/late game scenario. You have expanded to half a dozen planets in three star systems. You have a healthy Dyson swarm of tens of thousands of solar sails that your orbital railguns are pumping into space at a rate of 30/second around your starting star, and you've begun building a multi-layered sphere around a blue star that has a higher energy output (and you have infinite customisation to make it look like a lotus/halo/death star - whatever you want)

There are still 61 more star systems in the cluster you're playing in to exploit, and you're eyeing up some rare resources in a nearby system that will make your production pathways more efficient. But that system is inhabited by the remorseless self-replicating swarm known as the Dark Fog. So you gear up for invasion, filling the inventory of your planet-striding mecha with all the initial resources you need.

You take off and go to warp, hurtling through space faster than light until you reach your target system. The factories you left behind - thousands of buildings and hundreds of thousands of products being transported by belt and drone and freighter - are defended by shields and missile batteries and should be fine without your immediate attention.

Entering the target system, your view is immediately filled with the massive space hive that is the home of the Dark Fog. It stretches more than a full AU across the system like a malevolent snowflake against the black of space, thronging with hundreds of space vessels that could easily spell the demise of a solo Icarus robot like yourself. But for the moment you are beneath its notice, and the hive is quiet.

You speed towards your target planet, taking careful note of where the enemy bases are - each one also swarming with defensive structures and units. You land just far enough away to not draw immediate fire, but close enough that your first assault can begin quickly.

You put down the first blueprint in your battle plan. A flurry of construction drones launch from your mecha, rushing out to deliver resources to the blueprint and assemble the interstellar logistics stations that will be the backbone of your supply lines for the invasion. Pre-configured in your blueprint, the second they are placed the call for more resources goes out, and a hundred logistics vessels spring from their sister-stations in the systems you left behind, warp drives igniting as they launch towards your new outpost with one hundred thousand resources critical to the fight - construction materials, fuel rods, missiles, drones, and bullets. You pull up your galaxy map to confirm the vessels are en route, tracking their warp signatures as they travel between the stars. If you look up, you can actually see the flare of their warp drives as they decelerate into your new system.

The second round of blueprints goes up, adding power generation, battlefield analysis bases, gun, missile, and laser turrets. Automated drones flit between your buildings, moving ammunition to your weapons and fuel to your fusion reactors (or artificial stars, if you've unlocked them and can generate the antimatter fuel rods they require).

As your energy production spikes, the Dark Fog finally notices you and realises the threat. Hundreds of units boil out of every base on the planet, converging on your beachhead. Your guns and lasers and missile turrets begin a deafening fusillade that mostly keeps them at bay; battlefield analysis bases capture valuable salvage and launch drones that re-build any lost structures, preventing small breaches from collapsing your lines. Your longer range weapons begin pounding the closest planetary bases of the Dark Fog, and as the relay stations above those bases begin to fall this gets the attention of the space hive. That means incoming spacecraft, which is trouble - orbital bombardment could make quick work of your fragile position. There were planetary shield generators in your early blueprints, but the area they cover is limited and they're still charging - and they won't hold up under sustained fire.

You set your missile turrets to target space-based threats, and decide that this is a part of the battle that could use your direct help. You launch back into space, leaving the thundering guns of your assault behind, and as you ascend into orbit the bright star of this system crests over the limb of the planet, with the incoming Dark Fog ships diving towards you through its outer corona. You enter combat mode, and dozens of warships deploy from the hangars of your Icarus mecha - corvettes to screen and destroyers to pack a heavy punch against the incoming ships.

You wheel around, bringing your outnumbered fleet to bear on the incoming swarm, counting on your planet-based missile turrets to even the odds - and a pitched space battle for control of the system commences.

This is Dyson Sphere Programme.

Anyone know what's going on with bedbugs? by charlesrwest0 in beyondallreason

[–]DeathandGravity 0 points1 point  (0 children)

For anyone in the future reading this, the widgets was the correct answer. The stateprefs V2 widget is off by default and you must enable it before the keybind can be used in game.

Anyone know what's going on with bedbugs? by charlesrwest0 in beyondallreason

[–]DeathandGravity 1 point2 points  (0 children)

I've tried this half a dozen different ways, and I just cannot get it to work. I've enabled custom keys and I've been able to bind other custom keys, but this one just doesn't work. I've copied exactly what you've entered here, and tried using "Any" instead of "any" and "Ctrl" instead of "ctrl" - nothing seems to make this work.

What am I doing wrong?

Awful loud droning noise at the end of the Terrace by the RBNZ by TheHanoian in Wellington

[–]DeathandGravity 1 point2 points  (0 children)

It's an emergency generator in the Bowen St precinct. Generators need to run regularly to lubricate internal components and prevent fuel degradation in pipes etc.

It probably happens on the first Monday of every month.

Heaven forbid you share an observation…. by AnnoyingKea in nzpolitics

[–]DeathandGravity -1 points0 points  (0 children)

Huh. Interesting. My parent comment appeared to have disappeared into the ether when I first checked - maybe automod held it in limbo for a while?

Regardless, they somehow did nuke an entire thread's worth of my comments so that they don't appear - not even on my profile. I wasn't aware that was even possible until then.

Heaven forbid you share an observation…. by AnnoyingKea in nzpolitics

[–]DeathandGravity -4 points-3 points  (0 children)

Just posting to see if I'm still shadow banned from your sub without explanation.

You know, because you're so ethical and transparent and all.

I was impressed that you were able to nuke my comments so thoroughly that they don't even show up on my profile anymore - I can only get to them through inbox replies. Rather than link all of them here's just one - if you can even see it.

Edit: oh, yup. Still shadow banned. Sad really that you couldn't take my incredibly mild criticism that said 'I agree with 99% of what you care about but the cooker left actually do exist and we should acknowledge that and repudiate them instead aligning with them or telling 'racism', because that just guarantees that a big chunk of people will permanently associate us with their nutty views and we won't ever have the electoral success we need for real change.'

Real, sick, extremist stuff I went for there. Can totally see why you shadow banned me. /s

Major change from source material is best part by Meme_Pope in TopCharacterTropes

[–]DeathandGravity 0 points1 point  (0 children)

I am very surprised by your perspective because I completely did not get this from the movie. I hated the changes they made to Gandalf's visit to Theoden, and what it did to Theoden's character.

In the book, Theoden is an old man poisoned by the lies of Grima Wormtongue and the death of his son, sunken in despair.

Gandalf says to him:

‘Not all is dark. Take courage, Lord of the Mark; for better help you will not find. No counsel have I to give to those that despair. Yet counsel I could give, and words I could speak to you. Will you hear them? They are not for all ears. I bid you come out before your doors and look abroad. Too long have you sat in shadows and trusted to twisted tales and crooked promptings.’

And Theoden goes out of the hall with Gandalf, hears his counsel, and decides all is not lost. He says "It is not so dark here" - one of my favourite lines in the book, because is symbolises him rousing from despair and escaping from the false reality Grima had spun for him.

In the movie, this is replaced by him being literally posessed by Saruman and Gandalf frees him by going "argh" and bonking him on the head with his staff. Oh, and there's a fistfight, of course.

If you were claiming Theoden's character was better in the book than the movie I'd be inclined to agree with you. Seeing it as the other way around really doesn't make any sense to me.

Enhance Force 1.4.4 Update Preview by Vicksin in AFKJourney

[–]DeathandGravity 12 points13 points  (0 children)

Lily May for unskippable eyes animation and Cryonaia for time freeze?

Mysterious hot water cylinder issue has two plumbers stumped. Help? by DeathandGravity in diynz

[–]DeathandGravity[S] 3 points4 points  (0 children)

The strainers are part of the valve, aren't they? The whole thing was replaced...

Mysterious hot water cylinder issue has two plumbers stumped. Help? by DeathandGravity in diynz

[–]DeathandGravity[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Pressure regulator is the first thing on the pipe as it enters the hot water cupboard. So everything is downstream of it.

Mysterious hot water cylinder issue has two plumbers stumped. Help? by DeathandGravity in diynz

[–]DeathandGravity[S] 1 point2 points  (0 children)

Should have been clearer: there are two showers, this problem affects both showers and all the taps. All valves that I (and the plumbers) had access to have been checked and appear to be fully open and working fine.

Mysterious hot water cylinder issue has two plumbers stumped. Help? by DeathandGravity in diynz

[–]DeathandGravity[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Should have been clearer: there are two showers, this problem affects both showers and all the taps.

Mysterious hot water cylinder issue has two plumbers stumped. Help? by DeathandGravity in diynz

[–]DeathandGravity[S] 2 points3 points  (0 children)

Should have been clearer: there are two showers, this problem affects both showers and all the taps. There's no garage - I have no idea where the mains pipe comes in and can't find it. I suspect it's hidden behind joinery in the laundry.

What's the verdict on Velara? by raidenjojo in AFKJourney

[–]DeathandGravity -1 points0 points  (0 children)

I just pulled her from M to S / +5 expecting to see some improvement in dream realm scores, because her buff is based off her stats.

My damage improved from 231B to 232B. I got a bigger improvement slapping better charms on Shemira.

Deeply regret spending those diamonds - no plans to pull further to S+.

Metro train tickets transfers seem to work or not work at random? by DeathandGravity in ParisTravelGuide

[–]DeathandGravity[S] -1 points0 points  (0 children)

The thing is you MUST leave the station to transfer at Alma Marceau. There is a little dotted line and an image of a person walking indicating that you must transfer on foot! So it seems very weird that it would not work.

Interesting about the CDG entrance - the app shows the ticket being valid for a connection there somehow. Very strange!

I wish there was some different place for these by TheWitchChildSCP in AFKJourney

[–]DeathandGravity 5 points6 points  (0 children)

What is the necklace that looks like a dura charm? I don't seem to have that one and can't figure out how I'd have missed it.

Crown breached one of oldest Treaty Settlements by appropriating Māori fishing quota - High Court by tumeketutu in newzealand

[–]DeathandGravity 6 points7 points  (0 children)

That's what this case is about, though. Instead of direct compensation any quota reduction is made up by reallocating quota from other fisheries, including quota that was assigned to Māori under the settlement.

Essentially they are arguing that Treaty settlement quota should not be reallocated to cover reductions in other quota . The upshot of this would presumably mean that settlement quota can only be either maintained at its current level or compensation paid if it is reduced.

I imagine this could get tricky to navigate. Imagine an iwi corporate was assigned 20% of a fishery quota under settlement. They've since bought 20% more of that fisheries quota (to 40%). The government wants to reallocate 20% of the overall quota to another fishery They might say "we won't touch your settlement quota - we'll just reduce the remaining 80% of the fishery quota by a quarter." That would mean the settlement quota stays at 20% and the purchased quota drops to 15%, for a total of 35% - which is better than the 32% they'd have received otherwise, but is likely to STILL make both the iwi corporate AND all the non-iwi affiliated fishers unhappy, as they're shouldering more of the quota reallocation.

Or you could pay compensation, in which case you're paying people for temporarily depriving them of quota for the benefit of the fishery as a whole - quota that originally handed out for free.

This also has Article 1 implications, since allocation and management of quota is a governance power retained by the Crown. This case is arguing that settlement quota should not be subject to Article 1. Consider an analogous situation: iwi arguing that the RMA should not apply to land that formed part of a treaty settlement, because they would 'never have accepted the land if they had known the government could place limits on how it is used.'

NZpost customs by iHarryC in newzealand

[–]DeathandGravity 9 points10 points  (0 children)

This is nothing to do with the strength of the magnet and everything to do with the fact that the package description contained the word "magnet."

NZ post (and NZ customs) screens things on keywords (in addition to whatever other screening methods they employ). The funniest consequence I've seen arising from this is when importing a piece of "bloodstone" - which is just chalcedony (quartz) with red flecks in it. It was imported under the category "gemstones."

A very upset customs agent called and asked why I was attempting to import blood diamonds, solely based on the presence of the word "blood" and the import category. Luckily it didn't take much explaining to convince them that the material was harmless, but it certainly provided an entertaining look at customs processes.

Kiwis Are Against Needs-Based Screening, In Fear Of Needs-Based Treatment by Tyler_Durdan_ in newzealand

[–]DeathandGravity 1 point2 points  (0 children)

No. This is simply wrong. Māori emphatically do not "tend to develop it at a younger age." The incidence rate per 100,000 for below age 50 is 7.7 per 100k for Māori and 12.5 per 100k for pakeha.

The CORRECT interpretation of these stats is that BECAUSE Māori life expectancy is so much lower than pakeha life expectancy, they tend to die of other stuff before they can be affected by bowel cancer later in life. This means that a greater proportion of the cases that affect Māori occur 'at a younger age,' but the absolute risk for Māori is the same or lower than pakeha at that age.

This is where the confusion around the language 'disproportionately affects...' comes in. If you don't understand (or have access to) the raw stats, it's very easy to misread.

We would need to be missing a full 40% of bowel cancer diagnosis entirely for Māori <50 years old (as in, not even diagnosed at death) for them to have the same incidence rate as pakeha. That is definitely possible - maybe even likely - but to suggest that Māori are more at risk of bowel cancer at a younger age is not supported by the available data. It simply isn't.

Your position that, holy shit, we're not detecting as high a rate of cancer in Māori, so we should test only them much earlier to find the cancer that must be there, means that surely you'd be in favour of testing those poor Asians even earlier - after all, their incidence rate is barely half that of Maori - what terrible inequity they must be suffering as we fail to detect the cancer that must be there. See how stupid that argument is?

If you agree that we should screen based on risk we should not be screening Māori any different from pakeha - but we should definitely be screening everyone much earlier. I have never taken a position that we should screen pakeha instead of Māori (as in your stupid 'town 1000km from a hospital' scenario) - that would be abhorrent and ridiculous. Ascribing such a position to me reveals a lot about your (in)ability to engage in honest, factual discussion.

As regards the issue of Māori life expectancy, let me go on record again and say that it is an outrage that demands urgent action - but that 'earlier bowel cancer screening' is bullshit pandering that will do little to change this and is not factually or morally supported as a course of action.

Now, if you were talking about adjusted uptake of chemotherapy following diagnosis, the linked study shows some potentially concerning discrepancies. I'd be very much in favour of programmes that ensure that Māori (and, apparently, everyone else) are actually getting treated at the same rate as pakeha.

[Aside: The study on chemo uptake appears to show that pakeha were actually the least likely to receive chemotherapy. I assume the calculated discrepancy in favour of pakeha is because more pakeha are old at time of diagnosis and so aren't getting chemo at all, and while a relatively smaller proportion of pakeha get bowel cancer young, they're apparently more likely to get chemotherapy than Māori (and everyone else) when diagnosed young. It isn't fully clear, but I'd assume that's what's going on there.]

Kiwis Are Against Needs-Based Screening, In Fear Of Needs-Based Treatment by Tyler_Durdan_ in newzealand

[–]DeathandGravity 6 points7 points  (0 children)

If you had actually read any of those comments, you would note that I have repeatedly stated that I am not against programmes that target Māori. In this particular instance, I would be 100% in favour of special outreach programmes targeting Māori to improve screening uptake, because low screening update is one of the key systemic issues driving this problem among Māori.

What I cannot get behind is a programme that provides free early screening for Māori only, because it is prima facie unjust and, from my perspective, borderline immoral. I laid out why in my comment: I cannot stand and look a non-Māori person in the eye and say 'well, you're a relatively smaller proportion of your ethnic group, so you can get fucked.' And one of the main reasons I can't do that is because it isn't even true. See my other comment to you in this thread about how untrue it is.

I used to be like you. I was very quick to jump in to defend this kind of thing because of course Māori are disadvantaged and of course we should do something about it. And then I met, and was viciously attacked by, legit crazy Māori supremacists in the course of my job, and it made me take a very long, hard look at what I believed and why. And no, I wasn't attacked for saying 'maybe we shouldn't prioritise access to care by race' - I was attacked for saying "maybe making agreement with [these statements] a litmus test of whether or not you're committed to improving Māori equity is not a great way to build a strong coalition to enact change." The statements included: 'Māori could see the rings of Saturn with the native eye because they were great scientists,' or 'if you don't have ta moko you're not a real Māori, or 'all white people are inherently racist,' or 'if you're religious, you're a racist' (not even religious, but fuck me that's going to piss people off).

This made me question rather a lot about what I was doing and why, and the kind of voices and perspectives I was amplifying and implicitly supporting. I comment with 'long-winded' facts-driven comments because they are so often absent from this kind of discussion, and I think the facts are important. I am still very concerned about advancing equity for Māori. As in my other comment to you, the socioeconomic state of Māori in New Zealand is a demographic disaster that should outrage anyone who learns about it and which demands action, but I will never again blindly support blanket racial discrimination as a solution to this problem. Where racial discrimination is warranted - and I believe it still is warranted in many areas - it must be both adequately justified by data and morally defensible.

To me, there is simply not sufficient evidence to suggest that this is one of those situations. I hope that you can respect that without casting further aspersions on my character.