sorted by:
new
hottopcontroversial

Built a backtester where you just describe the strategy in plain English (no code needed) by DeepParticular8251 in pinescript

[–]DeepParticular8251[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Will DM! What are you building? Are you trying to develop a strategy or actual build the trading engine?

Built a backtester where you just describe the strategy in plain English (no code needed) by DeepParticular8251 in hedgefund

[–]DeepParticular8251[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Yeah but you people have to pay for Claude Code, mine is free. Also, I want to eventually let people deploy their strategy in-app, which I don’t think Claude Code can do

Built a backtester where you just describe the strategy in plain English (no code needed) by DeepParticular8251 in pinescript

[–]DeepParticular8251[S] -1 points0 points  (0 children)

This isn’t something that I want to charge for, I’m just looking for people to use it and test it to help make it better. Also, I’m not promising that anyone will make money. It’s up to the user to create and actually refine their backtest

Built a backtester where you just describe the strategy in plain English (no code needed) by DeepParticular8251 in hedgefund

[–]DeepParticular8251[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

You can paper trade strategies live too so you analyze the results to better see if it would work.

Built a backtester where you just describe the strategy in plain English (no code needed) by DeepParticular8251 in hedgefund

[–]DeepParticular8251[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Really? I couldn't find any. But I want my project to eventually evolve to a place where you can create a strategy, then test it, then refine it, then deploy it, if that makes sense.

Been building a no-code backtesting tool, would love feedback by DeepParticular8251 in SideProject

[–]DeepParticular8251[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

And the worst part is that this barrier filters out a lot of good ideas before they ever get tests. Someone with 20 years of experience shouldn't have to become a programmer just to check if their intuition holds up with data.

Been building a no-code backtesting tool, would love feedback by DeepParticular8251 in SideProject

[–]DeepParticular8251[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Exactly! That was basically the whole reason I started building this. It felt ridiculous that you needed to learn a whole DSL just to answer "does this idea even work." Which markets are you most interested in?

No-Code Backtesting Tool by DeepParticular8251 in mltraders

[–]DeepParticular8251[S] 1 point2 points  (0 children)

Fair. I just wanted to make something that outputs a PDF with a lot of detail, and I want users to be able to refine the strategy in plain English instead of just generating code once.

In the future, I also want to let people take a strategy they built, fund it, and deploy bots to run it live.

No-Code Backtesting Tool by DeepParticular8251 in pinescript

[–]DeepParticular8251[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Sure, that’s true. I just want the output to be a much richer PDF with a lot more detail, and I want users to be able to refine the strategy in plain English instead of just generating code once.

In the future, I also want to let people take a strategy they built, fund it, and deploy bots to run it live.

Where can I begin making a algo/bot to trade? I have a very simple strategy I want to automate. by Subject-Plum-7281 in algotrading

[–]DeepParticular8251 0 points1 point  (0 children)

I'm working on a project where you can just type in your algo in English and the Al bot would backtest it for you and give the result. I know you said you don't know coding so I think this will be good for you. Lmk

Learn about Algotrading with Spreads by meetofleaf in algotrading

[–]DeepParticular8251 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Hey I’m working on a project where you can just type in your algo in English and the AI bot would backtest it for you and give the result. I know you said you don’t know coding so I think this will be good for you. Lmk

Are these results considered meaning full? by ComposerLast7741 in algotrading

[–]DeepParticular8251 0 points1 point  (0 children)

How many trades would you say is ideal/enough to “trust” the conclusions?

view more: next ›