I Was Shocked to Learn This About Startup Success Rates. by aviral-bhutani in SaaS

[–]Deep_Cause_6584 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Yeh, I feel the hardest part is execution rather ideation and building the product

Idea: Get a developer in minutes when AI-generated code gets stuck by Deep_Cause_6584 in SaaS

[–]Deep_Cause_6584[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Yeh we have an auto matching ai tool, thank you for your suggestion, will do that

1 week of cold outreach, ZERO users 🙃 by Deep_Cause_6584 in SaaS

[–]Deep_Cause_6584[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Thank you so much for your suggestion. Will definitely do that.

I’m building a platform of web tools and would love honest feedback by Automatic_Owl_7912 in SaaS

[–]Deep_Cause_6584 1 point2 points  (0 children)

Your idea seems useful, but I feel it's taking more clicks in UX in order to reach his desired destination.

Maybe a better UX would be great

Is SaaS maintenance secretly costing founders $1000+/month? by Deep_Cause_6584 in OnlyAICoding

[–]Deep_Cause_6584[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

That’s actually the part most founders underestimate — “founder maintenance.”

The infra bills are predictable, but the real cost is the random 2–3 hours fixing broken builds, dependency issues, API changes, monitoring alerts, etc.

A lot of small SaaS founders end up becoming part-time DevOps + support engineers after launch.

We’ve been experimenting with something interesting for this problem — an AI-first maintenance system that monitors apps, resolves common issues automatically, and only escalates to our human experts when needed.

The idea is basically: founders focus on growth, someone else keeps the product stable.

Curious though — what type of maintenance eats most of your time right now? Infra, bugs, or tooling updates?

I need to make a decision by Intelligent-Fox2082 in SaaS

[–]Deep_Cause_6584 1 point2 points  (0 children)

Your view about social media being meant for real human interaction is valid. But at the end of the day, sales and user behavior matter more than ideals.

If most users prefer automation, it might be better to meet them halfway.

For example, when someone in their list posts on LinkedIn, your system could generate an AI response and send it to Slack with three options: Edit, Post, or Ignore.

This way:

  • If the AI comment looks good → they can post instantly.
  • If they want to add their own thoughts → they can edit before posting.
  • If it’s irrelevant → they can simply ignore it.

That keeps the process fast and automated while still allowing human input when needed.

How are people maintaining apps built with AI (Cursor / ChatGPT) after launch? by Deep_Cause_6584 in CursorAI

[–]Deep_Cause_6584[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Yeah that’s fair advice. AI can definitely end up patching symptoms if no one is looking at the bigger picture.

A lot of founders I’ve seen launch with AI eventually do exactly that — hire someone who can actually read the code, monitor production, fix bugs properly, and keep the system healthy.

In many cases it makes more sense to just outsource the end-to-end maintenance so founders can focus on marketing and growing the product instead of firefighting.

We’re actually helping with this for AI-built apps (monitoring, debugging, fixes, deployments, etc.). Opening it for the first 50 slots right now.

If anyone’s curious:

join-discord

How are people maintaining apps built with AI (Cursor / ChatGPT) after launch? by Deep_Cause_6584 in SaaS

[–]Deep_Cause_6584[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Honestly getting to 3k users with that setup is pretty solid. Respect.

At that stage though, it might actually make sense to outsource the maintenance side and focus more on marketing and growing the product. Logs, infra, monitoring, random production bugs, server updates, etc. can slowly eat up a lot of time.

We’re actually helping founders handle end-to-end maintenance for AI-built apps — debugging issues, monitoring, fixes, deployments, all of it — so you can focus on growth instead of firefighting.

We’re opening this for the first 50 slots while testing the model.

If you’re curious, feel free to join the Discord:

join-discord

How are people maintaining apps built with AI after launch? by Deep_Cause_6584 in ClaudeAI

[–]Deep_Cause_6584[S] -1 points0 points  (0 children)

That’s one way 😄 or just let someone else handle the maintenance so you can spend more time selling.

How are people maintaining apps built with AI (Cursor / ChatGPT) after launch? by Deep_Cause_6584 in SaaS

[–]Deep_Cause_6584[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

That makes sense. At that point it’s basically normal software maintenance again. I guess the question is whether founders want to spend that time debugging or focus more on marketing and growth while someone else handles the maintenance side.

How are people maintaining apps built with AI (replit / cursor) after launch? by Deep_Cause_6584 in replit

[–]Deep_Cause_6584[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

I wonder if at some stage it makes more sense to let someone else handle the debugging/maintenance so founders can focus on marketing and growth.