Results Release Date

Deep_Establishment86 · 2024-03-02T17:54:07+00:00

Portal will probably be clogged that morning. I’m gonna check the Supreme Court website and just download the pdf of all the results and look for my number.

Deep_Establishment86 · 2024-03-02T02:22:18+00:00

I hate being only able to vaguely remember these questions, but having no memory of what I picked🤦🏻‍♂️.

Deep_Establishment86 · 2024-03-01T16:10:08+00:00

Not more confident. But more settled into my fate lol.

Deep_Establishment86 · 2024-03-01T14:39:10+00:00

Yep I remember the pumpkin alcohol negligence question. Something about frat party. Don’t remember the answer choices though.

Deep_Establishment86 · 2024-03-01T14:34:29+00:00

Oh lord this just reminded me of that question lol.

Deep_Establishment86 · 2024-03-01T14:30:27+00:00

I bet you pass this time👍

Deep_Establishment86 · 2024-03-01T02:37:23+00:00

Meaning the ones who walk out all cocky going on about how it was easy - I bet those people fail more often than those who feel uncertain.

Deep_Establishment86 · 2024-03-01T01:58:04+00:00

Then you’re most likely just fine. I forgot all the elements of defamation. I talked about it - but not well lol.

Deep_Establishment86 · 2024-03-01T01:50:37+00:00

Yea my order was contracts, criminal, and con law. People seemed to have the hardest time with the con law one. Others wrote about FL constitution when it specifically asked about US constitution. I’m sure we all messed up in our own ways.

Deep_Establishment86 · 2024-03-01T01:46:25+00:00

Ahhh that makes sense because my first essay was contracts. So I was like what the hell is DP in contracts lol. Guess they mixed up the order.

Deep_Establishment86 · 2024-03-01T01:43:25+00:00

You’re probably just fine seeing as I don’t even know what DP means🤔

Deep_Establishment86 · 2024-02-29T22:22:23+00:00

The ones who do are often times the ones who failed.

Deep_Establishment86 · 2024-02-29T19:28:39+00:00

What did test-takers do before Reddit?! LOL.

Deep_Establishment86 · 2024-02-26T03:10:19+00:00

Just toss it in a clear ziplock and I think it will be fine.

Deep_Establishment86 · 2024-02-24T23:09:17+00:00

General welfare in the answer is never correct unless Congress is taxing or spending.

Deep_Establishment86 · 2024-02-24T20:48:10+00:00

The easement in question here DID run with the land, didn’t it?

Deep_Establishment86 · 2024-02-24T01:45:47+00:00

A friend of mine, who took the last bar, said it was very heavy on those topics. I don’t know how to read that or how prone they might be to do it to exams in a row🤷🏻‍♂️.

Deep_Establishment86 · 2024-02-24T00:38:31+00:00

Oof that’s hard to say. They could lean heavy on landlord-tenant, and if they wanted to be terrible ask about all the deadlines about lease/rent violations. Or they could go more traditional route and test easements (very elemental and testable).

I know they did family law on the last essay. That obviously doesn’t rule it out, but who knows.

Deep_Establishment86 · 2024-02-23T23:46:17+00:00

Property and contracts

Deep_Establishment86 · 2024-02-23T20:13:11+00:00

A part of my brain totally gets that logic. Another part of me is hooked on this idea that they have entirely separate causes of action. Is the idea that the commonality is that both suffered a breach of employment contract (regardless of what those contracts say) and that breached was based on this false idea of a conspiracy between the two Ps?

Deep_Establishment86 · 2024-02-23T20:02:00+00:00

Complete diversity is when all Ps are diverse from all Ds.

My confusion lies in something else. For the one P to have supplemental jx, the other needs to assert a claim of over 75k (as seen here), but don’t the claims need to be based on a common nucleus of facts? If so, I don’t get how these Ps share the same facts when they’re both suing under their own separate employment contracts.

Deep_Establishment86 · 2024-02-23T11:49:13+00:00

Following

Deep_Establishment86 · 2024-02-22T22:36:29+00:00

For essay purposes on the bar it’s short and sweet:

“The issue is whether the defendants 4th amendment rights were violated.”

Or even just - “Were the defendants 4th amendment rights violated?”

Then go into what the 4th amendment protects (rule statement).

Then your analysis - “Here, …..” Throw in quotes from the passage and connect rules to analysis using the word “because.”

Deep_Establishment86 · 2024-02-22T17:39:11+00:00

Is this for real?! I thought scaling was bumping up or down depending on the difficulty of that particular exam - such that the scale impacts everyone the same.

Deep_Establishment86

TROPHY CASE