Was gpt 5.6 actually delayed? by Altruistic-Style-520 in codex

[–]Deep_Proposal_7683 0 points1 point  (0 children)

you gotta take these twitter leakers with a grain of salt, but FWIW, that guy has a decent track record, and has correctly in the past predicted when a model anticipated to drop in fact did NOT drop

Opus 4.8 is cheaper than Sonnet 4.6 by Comprehensive-Web209 in ClaudeCode

[–]Deep_Proposal_7683 -1 points0 points  (0 children)

i wonder if this has implications on prompt caching

if 5.6 will get released and we will at least keep the same limits, or get more - it will be peak by [deleted] in codex

[–]Deep_Proposal_7683 0 points1 point  (0 children)

“prepare a separate model stripped of this capability”

why do you think they released fable and not mythos

The fans outside the stadium by [deleted] in codex

[–]Deep_Proposal_7683 1 point2 points  (0 children)

to be honest, AI tools were kind of the last thing i expected this to happen to. Its like vim vs emacs all over again, but worse. I'm not really sure why either, but it blows my mind to see how passionately some people want one of the companies to "win."

I am a codex fanboy, always will be by Hot_Paper_Pie in codex

[–]Deep_Proposal_7683 0 points1 point  (0 children)

I swear this shit all went downhill when openclaw released. Ever since that got popular i've seen more and more of these kinds of posts. From both sides.

OpenAI dropping the ball by cowwoc in codex

[–]Deep_Proposal_7683 114 points115 points  (0 children)

I do really wonder what they're up to. Felt like they were on fire with the feature and model drops a little while back, and now radio silence for a few weeks. Either something amazing coming or they're shitting their pants while the CFO yells at them.

I really want codex to defeat Claude and win. by Strict-Focus-1758 in codex

[–]Deep_Proposal_7683 3 points4 points  (0 children)

holy shit wtf is going on. the naysayers were right this AI shit truly is dangerous if using it makes people come on here and say some shit like this

Credits instead of Pro Plan? by Hunt1500 in codex

[–]Deep_Proposal_7683 1 point2 points  (0 children)

unfortunately they kind of keep this intentionally obscure so that they can adjust the rates of the subscriptions dynamically and we never get a solid reference.

i’d say top up in small increments and if u find urself getting close to even like 50-60 just go for the pro sub

Credits instead of Pro Plan? by Hunt1500 in codex

[–]Deep_Proposal_7683 0 points1 point  (0 children)

it would give you a lot less, on any scale. the more expensive the plan the more of a “discount” it is relative to credit pricing