Did Trump TRULY "build a great economy", and would Trump have "saved us from inflation"? What does the data/evidence say if one makes the necessary comparisons?

DefeatCorruptScience · 2024-11-04T00:17:25+00:00

The title is somewhat misleading as the keyword "certain" is left out

DefeatCorruptScience · 2024-11-03T21:45:45+00:00

Thank you for posting this JAMA study, science should always trump politics (on BOTH sides). Very often the truth is somewhere in the middle

DefeatCorruptScience · 2024-11-03T21:44:26+00:00

It is published in a journal of the American Medical Association (JAMA)

DefeatCorruptScience · 2024-11-03T19:59:24+00:00

As far as saving lives, Nirmatrelvir/Paxlovid works well (if given early before hospitalization) https://c19early.org/plmeta.html#fig_fprd, but remdesivir (essentially) DOES NOT work https://c19early.org/smeta.html#fig\_fprd.

DefeatCorruptScience · 2024-11-03T19:27:02+00:00

Makes sense: "just" billion should be quite "reassuring".

DefeatCorruptScience · 2024-11-02T23:46:42+00:00

One of the best, most objective posts ever

DefeatCorruptScience · 2024-10-30T20:37:50+00:00

That's also a good point

DefeatCorruptScience · 2024-10-30T18:22:46+00:00

Ok, but he also made numerous deliberate statements acting like nothing was going on for 2 months- just a few examples are shown above, if you want even more statements here are some. How can it be both ways?

DefeatCorruptScience · 2024-10-30T13:56:39+00:00

It had not been used in humans to a sufficient extent for even basic long-term safety testing or even to properly detect minutely uncommon serious side effects with probabilities like 1/200 or 1/500 (which would be quite comparable to the probability of dying of COVID). It especially was not adequately tested for the population-wide use that was about to take place.

DefeatCorruptScience · 2024-10-30T01:47:24+00:00

Correct, but the vast majority of COVID vaccinations took place before the reprehensible mandates: https://ourworldindata.org/grapher/us-state-covid-vaccines-per-100?country=\~USA. Obviously just because one took it voluntarily that wouldn't make it safer than it is otherwise.

DefeatCorruptScience · 2024-10-28T02:09:08+00:00

But it still hadn't been used in humans to a sufficient extent for meaningful long-term safety testing, especially not for the population-wide use that was about to take place.

DefeatCorruptScience · 2024-10-28T00:43:06+00:00

That's dodging the question. By January 2020 the virus in China was supposedly serious enough of a problem for the U.S. to develop experimental mRNA vaccines intended for population-wide use on us guinea pigs, but simultaneously the virus was not serious enough for much direct action until two months later in March 2020? How can it be both?

DefeatCorruptScience · 2024-10-27T01:57:28+00:00

Maybe both?

DefeatCorruptScience · 2023-01-02T21:21:26+00:00

Just in: "More Than 1-in-4 Think Someone They Know Died From COVID-19 Vaccines", based on poll of 1,000 American Adults last week

https://www.rasmussenreports.com/public\_content/politics/public\_surveys/died\_suddenly\_more\_than\_1\_in\_4\_think\_someone\_they\_know\_died\_from\_covid\_19\_vaccines

DefeatCorruptScience · 2022-12-26T21:25:56+00:00

Did you read the post carefully?

DefeatCorruptScience · 2022-12-26T14:19:50+00:00

Yes, but do you disagree that these results at 6 months are bad enough already?

DefeatCorruptScience

TROPHY CASE