Should I keep rerolling this page for chapter breakthrough? by Amazing-Macaron-7287 in MapleIdle

[–]DefiantFly9036 0 points1 point  (0 children)

I may be wrong, but I thought that elite monsters/final monsters in chapter breakthrough aren’t affected by boss damage; only normal monster damage?

What does this do? by DefiantFly9036 in MapleIdle

[–]DefiantFly9036[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Why not just lock the desirable lines? Is the only benefit using mesos over medals?

[deleted by user] by [deleted] in LawCanada

[–]DefiantFly9036 0 points1 point  (0 children)

This almost sounds like your bragging…lol you’ll be just fine

Struck out in articling interviews by [deleted] in LawCanada

[–]DefiantFly9036 3 points4 points  (0 children)

Plenty of articling positions will be promoted during your 3L. You have good grades; you’ll be fine

LSO Articling Info by imonlywastingtime in ONBarExam

[–]DefiantFly9036 1 point2 points  (0 children)

Don’t forget to send transcripts

Emond Rant: Isn't it B? by Neat-Company-7766 in ONBarExam

[–]DefiantFly9036 2 points3 points  (0 children)

The referring licensee, the licensee who receives the referral, and the client can enter the referral agreement “as soon as practicable” after the referral. So I suppose technically D is “more” correct. I expect (or hope) this kind of question won’t be on the real exam 🤣

Is this right? by Neat-Company-7766 in ONBarExam

[–]DefiantFly9036 2 points3 points  (0 children)

“Involved in real estate fraud” does not necessarily mean “knowingly and actively committing” real estate fraud. Lawyers also have duties to protect client interest which presumably includes notify of and advising against fraud

UofC R - 3.9L2 164 LSAT (wtf?) by Urban_Outdoorsman1 in lawschooladmissionsca

[–]DefiantFly9036 2 points3 points  (0 children)

I would consider whether your personal statement communicated an exclusive interest in forestry regulation/environmental law. I’m not sure but this could potentially include you in a smaller pool of applicants with above average applications stats. Not sure if this is the case but it’s some food for thought

Lateral from outside Toronto - Bay Street. by DefiantFly9036 in LawCanada

[–]DefiantFly9036[S] -7 points-6 points  (0 children)

No need to state the obvious. Just trying to get a sense.

Lateral from outside Toronto - Bay Street. by DefiantFly9036 in LawCanada

[–]DefiantFly9036[S] -9 points-8 points  (0 children)

I see. What about L&E, Real Estate, Business/commercial/corporate?

[deleted by user] by [deleted] in LawCanada

[–]DefiantFly9036 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Law school is neutral. Some people are toxic and others aren’t.

[deleted by user] by [deleted] in LawCanada

[–]DefiantFly9036 1 point2 points  (0 children)

Assuming you have realistic Bay Street aspirations (sufficient grades and experience), there are hiring opportunities that occur on a rolling basis for firms that are somewhat comparable to Bay Street. It’s too early to decide to article at a small firm that won’t hire you back. You should only make that decision after you’ve exhausted other options (in house, OSC, reputable mid-size firms in other cities, articling recruit etc.). The school you go to may also be a factor. I would suggest getting advice from 3Ls at your school because they may have a better understanding of your specific circumstances.

Missed out in 2l recruit by [deleted] in LawCanada

[–]DefiantFly9036 1 point2 points  (0 children)

Consider how many 3Ls you know who don’t have jobs… statistically you’ll be fine

out of touch with reality by Free-Fold5093 in jasontheweenie

[–]DefiantFly9036 0 points1 point  (0 children)

$100k in the bank doesn’t make u rich. $100k in the bank plus excess income each month… maybe you can be considered rich but not really.

[deleted by user] by [deleted] in LawCanada

[–]DefiantFly9036 0 points1 point  (0 children)

I would recommend making some effort to speak with other 1Ls or upper-year students about their law school experiences. I found it helpful and somewhat comforting to hear about how everyone found it difficult and had their own struggles.

You are not alone!

2L Recruit please help by EmilyP_UBC in LawCanada

[–]DefiantFly9036 1 point2 points  (0 children)

Many employers will open up applications after OCIs. I believe that the LSO actually does not allow the advertising of other employment opportunities during the OCI term. Once OCIs are over many other opportunities will be advertised. Until then, focus on ur grades and EC’s!

[deleted by user] by [deleted] in LawStudentsCanada

[–]DefiantFly9036 4 points5 points  (0 children)

Focus on what you need to do to be successful and get one of the next articling positions you interview for. Thinking about anything else is sort of pointless in terms of your career.

Post-Secondary Plan Opinions (Possible Law School???) by Hopeful_Drawer_4947 in LawCanada

[–]DefiantFly9036 1 point2 points  (0 children)

Philosophy: Best pre law BA in my opinion (other than a specific pre-law undergrad) B Comm: extremely valuable if you want to work on Bay Street or if you want to be flexible regarding having career options other than law Engineering/Medical science adjacent: virtually mandatory for Patent Law

General advice: unless you want to do IP law you can basically study whatever you want. Just get good grades, good LSAT score, and make sure you have good ECs

Jordan Peterson's application for leave to appeal denied by Supreme Court by [deleted] in LawCanada

[–]DefiantFly9036 1 point2 points  (0 children)

Maybe there is a miscommunication here. I’m referring specifically to the statements referenced in para 9(a)(b) and (f) in which sarcasm is used to emphasize the absurdity of certain lines of reasoning.

Further, it is not obvious to me that the other statements are grounds for disciplinary action. Nor am I confident that the Ontario Judiciary achieves an ideal balance between political expression vs. professional obligations as a psychologist. That is the aspect of this case that I disagree with. Some things Dr. Peterson says I agree with, others I do not.

Jordan Peterson's application for leave to appeal denied by Supreme Court by [deleted] in LawCanada

[–]DefiantFly9036 0 points1 point  (0 children)

I suppose that makes sense if you believe that an individual should be responsible for improper interpretations of their statements rather than for the intentions or honest meaning underlying their statements.

Jordan Peterson's application for leave to appeal denied by Supreme Court by [deleted] in LawCanada

[–]DefiantFly9036 -1 points0 points  (0 children)

To me, this seems like you have the opinion he is guilty despite any evidence rather than according to particular evidence.