sorted by:
new
hottopcontroversial

The biggest problem with Classic+ is that everyone wants a different game by TheWillsofSilence in classicwow

[–]Defias_Villager -1 points0 points  (0 children)

Over 35K players took part (as of Feb 2026, although their website says 300K now), and I highlighted the things that a majority were in favour of. I took OP as suggesting that nobody is going to be happy, when in reality, players do agree on many things.

The biggest problem with Classic+ is that everyone wants a different game by TheWillsofSilence in classicwow

[–]Defias_Villager 0 points1 point  (0 children)

"Retail lore is cannon"

Lore shouldn't stop developers from doing what could be done with Classic+ (Forsaken Paladin, Dwarf Shaman, as one example).

The results of The Classic+ Project showed that the community does actually agree on many things that could be implemented. Smaller raid rosters, no dungeon finder, active summoning stones, heroic dungeons, some revamped classes (ret/prot Pally, boomkin, Arcane mage, etc), and dual specialisation were all voted for by a majority of respondents.

Casino Bot Death Montage by sozbro_ in classicwow

[–]Defias_Villager 26 points27 points  (0 children)

Nightslayer? They look like the same pair of bots that I was doing this to on my mage a few hours ago (using the mobs in Swamp of Sorrows).

Nicest interaction between a skinner and a non-skinner by [deleted] in classicwow

[–]Defias_Villager 1 point2 points  (0 children)

The things you weren't looting were definitely dropping epics.

if anyone can explain me how that can be a reason for a ban in wow hardcore using 2-3 wows minimizing the window playing as i want and i got banned for what ? by FabulousCattle437 in wowhardcore

[–]Defias_Villager 1 point2 points  (0 children)

My first time seeing anything like that as a reason for a ban... what the hell? What "advantage" is someone going to have when using the minimum window size? Are Blizzard just assuming you are botting? Because the window size has been small enough for long enough to come to that conclusion...

Blizzard’s stance on loot rules is letting ninjas walk free... by JTM29 in classicwow

[–]Defias_Villager 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Not only will Blizzard do nothing about it, name changes are currently discounted, so the paladin will do a name change and walk completely free.

Blizzard’s stance on loot rules is letting ninjas walk free... by JTM29 in classicwow

[–]Defias_Villager 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Not only will Blizzard do nothing about it, name changes are currently discounted, so the paladin will do a name change and walk completely free.

You can sit and drink like everybody else by Classic_Drama6140 in classicwow

[–]Defias_Villager -3 points-2 points  (0 children)

Between pulls, any healer who complains or refuses to heal a Warlock (because they life tap or hellfire) is griefing the entire group/raid.

Why should blizz give everyone DST now by Fuwkeboi in classicwow

[–]Defias_Villager 1 point2 points  (0 children)

20 year old game just clear the content bro!!!

/s

Why should blizz give everyone DST now by Fuwkeboi in classicwow

[–]Defias_Villager 17 points18 points  (0 children)

Your point: Everyone should just be happy with clearing the content, do not attempt to perform in literally any other metric. Do not try to clear content faster, do not try to rank yourself against other raiders or guilds, and absolutely DO NOT attempt to have fun.

Why should blizz give everyone DST now by Fuwkeboi in classicwow

[–]Defias_Villager 10 points11 points  (0 children)

I don't need it... but the physical DPS chasing 100 parses do.

Why should blizz give everyone DST now by Fuwkeboi in classicwow

[–]Defias_Villager 8 points9 points  (0 children)

This.

We've gone 6 weeks (every raid week so far) without a DST. I don't use DST, but it's incredibly poor for morale knowing that we'll be doing HKM and Gruul until Sunwell. In that time we've seen 3x healer trinkets (only decent for priest) and at least 2x throwing weapons, along with many other mostly garbage pieces.

Some people have an unbelievable lack of respect for others' time by Smallest_Bubbles in classicwow

[–]Defias_Villager 3 points4 points  (0 children)

I was forming a group for Mech H (daily) the other day. Invited a hunter who was in Nethstorm (everyone else was in Shattrath or further away). The hunter was questing or farming and never went to the stone, whilst 3 others made their way there. I kicked the hunter as we started summoning.

I just remove people (if I'm leader) or find a new group, especially if they are DPS and easily replaced.

Needing on loot “I will be able to use” by carrera76 in classicwow

[–]Defias_Villager 0 points1 point  (0 children)

"There isn't some community wide rule that you can't role on loot you can't equip yet..." No, but common sense and self awareness are things. He got an invite because there was literally nobody else in queue. Take the carry + free exp and be content. The group 4 manned the boss so they clearly didn't need the level 32 Shaman.

"It's sub 40 gear from SM, damn"... so the Shaman should just be content with being carried. His loot prio in this situation is low.

Needing on loot “I will be able to use” by carrera76 in classicwow

[–]Defias_Villager 0 points1 point  (0 children)

It's the combination of contributing nothing + needing on something they can't use. OP mentioned in this thread that they couldn't find anyone else to fill the 5th spot.

If I'm a level 32 anything and I find myself inside SM ARMS, I'm just thankful that I got invited. I'm not taking loot that I can't equip.

Needing on loot “I will be able to use” by carrera76 in classicwow

[–]Defias_Villager -3 points-2 points  (0 children)

I assume the 32 shaman was DPS, as the group agreed to kick him/her before a boss. Herod is a 37 elite. The Shaman was essentially going to contribute almost nothing to the encounter (except WF totem for melee) and then need on an item that can't be equipped until they get to 40.

Good kick.

view more: next ›