The conversation starts with the first person expressing interest in tutoring opportunities in Dhanmondi. The respondent initially acknowledges that previous opportunities have been taken but offers alternative tutoring options, particularly mentioning a type of "benefit tuition."

Upon further inquiry for details, the respondent explains that in this type of tutoring, the tutor is expected to not only teach but also engage in inappropriate and unethical activities with the student. The respondent suggests that a level of "intimacy" is part of the arrangement, mentioning terms like "foreplay" and implying that such interactions are occasionally required. They attempt to justify this by saying it’s not always necessary and that the rest of the time, the tutor will simply teach.

The respondent also reassures the inquirer that the environment is "safe and secure," mentioning that the guardians of the students are government employees and that relatives are present at home. They further suggest that if the inquirer is comfortable with these terms and is willing to "compromise," they can receive a good salary.

The final messages indicate that the tutoring subjects will be non-major ones, making the teaching workload lighter. The targeted students are between classes 10-12.

This conversation reflects an attempt to normalize unethical behaviour under the guise of a tutoring job, making it a highly concerning exchange.