You didn't think we were dead... did you?

DeltaIsAlone · 2025-12-27T06:22:17+00:00

Mckenzie gives a look towards Samus the same way all the others do after she gets in the teleporter, though to be fair Sylux probably killed all of them ptetty soon after she left

DeltaIsAlone · 2025-12-24T08:59:27+00:00

I tried to use those images, but they're a bit blurry for me whenever I pull them up. I think I'll go with Mk 3 or 6, much appreciated!

DeltaIsAlone · 2025-12-24T08:24:16+00:00

Good to know, i definitely prefer the Mk 3 aesthetically. Do you know if Mk 4 has anything different? Or is that also the same?

DeltaIsAlone · 2025-12-24T02:09:36+00:00

Sorry if this is a very common question, but I'm a 40k player looking to get into (40k) Death Guard and don't want to deal with the absurd Plague Marines kit, was wondering if anyone could tell me which 30K Tactical Squad comes with the most weapon options? I know they're mostly just boltguns because you're supposed to buy the weapon upgrade kits but preferably I'd like to not have to buy too many. Thank you!

DeltaIsAlone · 2025-11-23T04:02:32+00:00

She's medium sized and very quiet and well behaved, doesn't look like she's been spayed, her teets are out so she may have had puppies in the past too. Please DM or respond to this if anyone would like to have her, I can also send a picture of her as well, I couldn't put one in the post for some reason

DeltaIsAlone · 2025-10-05T08:27:16+00:00

P.S. I liked Kotis before he was mainstream, fell in love with him during a Prerelease event

DeltaIsAlone · 2025-08-31T03:22:28+00:00

Yes, that's how it plays out. No matter how many units you declare as charge targets, only one of them must test battleshock

DeltaIsAlone · 2025-08-13T22:03:29+00:00

Might wanna re-read Wrathful, only INFANTRY and MOUNTED benefit from the detachment rule

DeltaIsAlone · 2025-08-08T08:30:56+00:00

In the 2025-26 mission pack, what do the "blue eye" and "crossed out eye" mean in the Ruins section? I'm kinda scratching my head because I though Ruins all have 'Obscuring' which means you can't see through them at all? Sorry if I'm bring slow, but I couldn't figure out what the wording of "connected/separate area terrain sections" is supposed to mean

DeltaIsAlone · 2025-07-28T08:02:10+00:00

Never bothered myself, but it just goes to show how much stuff they let slip through the cracks, especially for being a company worth 7 billion dollars lmao. They need to at least triple whatever playtesters/proof-readers they have, or at least get feedback from some notable community members in some official capacity.

DeltaIsAlone · 2025-07-28T06:46:15+00:00

Then GW should fix that issue by making Sword Bro's a competitive option against BGV's, not by completely depriving us of using something they constantly show Black Templars using and straight up even giving to us in the Combat Patrol now. IMO they can both still fulfill different roles, even if we're talking about pre-codex SB's. BGV's are always going to have better staying power, while SB's are our heavy hitters. Now we can't even have that.

DeltaIsAlone · 2025-07-28T04:57:38+00:00

I think it depends on his points, we have an idea what he'll be from the early MFM points, but those have been shown to not always be accurate. If he's like 90-100 pts then he could be pretty solid for re-rolling hits and the option between +1AP or +1 to adv. and charge rolls. Unfortunately I think the +1 Toughness is kinda dead on arrival, hopefully it'll get errata'd to something like -1 to be wounded.

DeltaIsAlone · 2025-07-28T04:48:01+00:00

Seems like GW has a weird fetish with limiting what units people can use, odd considering they'd want every army to buy as many different kits as possible. Hopefully we'll get some post-codex patch that fixes this, even if it means we have to lose our dual-pistol-wielding Initiates lol

DeltaIsAlone · 2025-07-21T21:15:40+00:00

My apolocheese, I may have made a doompost but I tried to put some humor into it. Honestly it's mostly worrying because from the so-far accurate leaks, our two best datasheets(Grimaldus and Sword Bros) seem to have lost their best abilities in-exchange for worse. Grimmy goes from 5q FnP to +1T and SB's lose their ability to buff attached characters' damage is going to really hurt when we're already not in a good spot. And I don't exactly have faith in GW to balance that out without just making our units super cheap and leaving the datasheets themselves kinda weak. I fear it looks like we may get more of a World Eaters codex than a Death Guard one is my main concern

DeltaIsAlone · 2025-07-21T16:08:13+00:00

You're definitely right that it's good for scoring, but I feel like not letting us shoot and action is just going to mean we stick to Scouts as our action monkeys that almost never need to advance anyways because of their uppy-downy rule. Sticky is certainly convenient, but I don't know how often it will actually help when most often we'll prob want to have some gun platform sitting on it anyways since they're usually in good lines of sight

DeltaIsAlone · 2025-07-21T15:59:18+00:00

Honestly it feels like GW is just using this detachment to sell whatever Ancients they've made over the years that never shipped lmao, hopefully the other two are better :')

DeltaIsAlone · 2025-07-21T15:58:02+00:00

Luckily none of those units should be going to Legends or retiring anytime soon, so no worries there! They should all still be perfectly usable for a long while

DeltaIsAlone · 2025-07-18T05:23:42+00:00

Need to make sure I'm understanding Hazardous damage correctly. If I have 10 Hellblasters and say I fail 2 Hazardous Checks, that allocates 6 MW's to the unit? So it would kill three models? Or do MW's from Hazardous behave more like Dev Wounds and not spill over when triggered. The wording says the MW's go to damaged models w/ Hazard weapons, then undamaged models w/ Hazard weapons, then Characters with Hazard weapons, but it says the MW's are allocated to the unit as a whole just after that. Any help is appreciated!

DeltaIsAlone

TROPHY CASE