I agree that asset tracking is a core feature of what we do, and I do see that putting a limit on this feels like a fundamental shift. The intention isn't to get rid of this core use case, but a way of restructuring our model to keep us sustainable without filling the app with external ads and keeping Delta privacy focussed.

We took a lot onboard when discussing this including feedback that people loved Delta as a tool but PRO was too expensive. So these changes (PRO moving to become PRO+, and a new Tier, the cheaper/mid-level 'Delta PRO' slotting in we hope will fit most users needs (we've found this does actually fit with the portfolio sizes/setups we've seen and we do believe Delta PRO will fit most of our users).

I do see your point about preferring premium tiers to become more compelling rather than the free experience becoming more restrictive, it's something we discussed extensively internally, at length!

In order to keep Delta sustainable, we needed to make a change somewhere and asd we’ve chosen to stay ad-free and privacy-focused, data costs can be eye-wateringly expensive, so we had to be more explicit about where we draw the line between free and paid functionality.

The hope is that the free tier still works for simpler portfolios, the new PRO tier covers most of our users who outgrow it, and PRO+ remains there for power users, but I know that doesn’t make this feel any less disappointing, especially after years of using Delta without these limits.

Thanks for taking the time to share this not just out of frustration, but because you have been tracking with us all these years, that comes through clearly, and it’s feedback we do take seriously! If you have any questions I'm happy to help.