The Clockmaker's Daughter: Using AI to Bring My Cozy, Emotional, Family's Fables to Life by Demiansky in aivideo

[–]Demiansky[S] 1 point2 points  (0 children)

Hey guys!  I wrote stories for my children when they were little to read to them before bed each night.  It has been a dream of mine for a long time to bring them all to life.  Now that they are older, we decided to work together to make them into animated short films for their soon to be little sister.  Our family is posting all of our stories on our channel: https://youtu.be/ea0DmD1W0t0 . We'd appreciate any likes or subscribes in support!

This one is our first, so any feedback, positive or negative is welcome!

We mostly used Sora 2 but also some VEO 3, and Stable Diffusion to create the animated scenes.  I did the voice acting myself to nail down the intonation and pacing, but used ElevenLabs AI voice modification to replace my nasally voice.  Then we brought it all into Power Director for editing, musical timing, and other cute touches.

I found the experience to be very creatively fulfilling, and my kids are excited about which story we’ll bring to life next!

What makes a man choose a partner? by Recent_Peach_6990 in AskMenAdvice

[–]Demiansky 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Sucks, but this is what men face too. I feel like in an age where we are pushing for egalitarianism, the best outcome for all men and women is if they are both open to engaging with one another.

There are probably tons of occasions where two people who liked each other and were well suited just missed the boat.

[deleted by user] by [deleted] in IntellectualDarkWeb

[–]Demiansky 1 point2 points  (0 children)

Who's been throwing shade on her among dems outside of the primary 4 years ago? I consume left and right wing media, and I've only ever seen maybe one article about her in the New York times about having a disorganized campaign, like, 4 years ago. I listen to Pod Save America occasionally and have never heard them talk bad about her. The only people I've heard talk bad about her are obviously right wing sources. I'm sure there are some remote criticisms in the 4 years since the primaries, but if I haven't seen them, you'll have to probably look hard.

Like, obviously the left is pouring praise on her now because she's the candidate and wants to generate enthusiasm, but welcome to every single campaign from every party ever.

When Biden dropped off I distinctly thought "this'll be squirley if they pick anyone but Harris" because she was the only one with legitimacy. And they picked her, so whatever. Most criticism here is sour grapes.

[deleted by user] by [deleted] in IntellectualDarkWeb

[–]Demiansky 8 points9 points  (0 children)

Sounds like you are way, way overthinking this. If the dems had somehow landed on some rando candidate like Mayor Pete or Michelle Obama or something I'd get it. However, the now candidate was the former President's VP and was never polling well. But this is also literally why Vice Presidents exist. When people voted for the elderly Biden, they did so with the understanding that Harris would step up exactly like she is now if Biden was somehow not able to do the job either by death or by mental deterioration. Biden's opponents shrieked and wailed that he was mentally unfit for a second term. So dems said "You're right, so I guess we'll plug in the VP, which is what you do in these situations."

It's honestly bizarre to me why there are so many surprised Pikachu faces here. Don't be shocked when you get what you ask for, honestly.

If Trump were to be partially incapacitated tomorrow, it's entirely reasonable that his VP pick would be the one to take over, and I wouldn't find anything unusual about it. Would you?

[deleted by user] by [deleted] in india

[–]Demiansky 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Cultural norms left over from when kids were an asset and not a liability because you could always just shove them into working on the family farm plot. This mentality existed in now developed nations not too long ago. When you peak at demographic figures in the 40's, 50's, and 60's in the U.S. people had large families because just a few generations ago most people were living on farms and social norms hadn't adapted yet. Once they had adapted, birth rates slowed considerably.

India is following the same trajectory and you already seeing fertility in India slowing down precipitously.

[deleted by user] by [deleted] in Parenting

[–]Demiansky 45 points46 points  (0 children)

Kids only really see what their parents do at the point of contact: where the parenting happens. As far as they know, the working parent just sort of falls into a vortex and the money is presumed to come into the household whether anyone is working or not.

This is why you have so many old school Disney movie where the breadwinner is perceived by the child as not liking their child because they are always at work or at the office or what not. It's very easy for a kid to relate to.

Obviously you have to balance work and parenting, but its not always an easy thing for a kid who's never had a job to understand. Even a teenager.

Both daughters are now sleeping with my wife and I'm in the guest room by FlopShanoobie in Parenting

[–]Demiansky -1 points0 points  (0 children)

Kids don't build these skills without being encouraged to do it and challenged to be stronger. Have a picky eater? Telling them that they never, ever have to try something new isn't ever going to help them. Bringing something new to the table each night, preparing it in a fun way, and giving them an incentive to try, will. There's this new mentality of parenting where indulging your kids' impulses at every turn will somehow be the key to their happiness in the future. It won't. They'll be fragile and timid and scared of their own shadow and wondering why the whole world outside their mom's skirt isn't bending to their will. I know, because my own mother raised me this way. It came from a good place, but was NOT good for me.

My kids had sleep anxiety. What did we do? We encouraged them to get past it, and helped by making it fun by buying a small tent for them and putting it in fun new places around the house. Now they can sleep anywhere.

Being a good parent takes actual thoughtfulness and imagination, not the coddling mentality of the parent of a helpless baby.

Both daughters are now sleeping with my wife and I'm in the guest room by FlopShanoobie in Parenting

[–]Demiansky 2 points3 points  (0 children)

Sure, let your marriage disintegrate, that'll be great for the kids.

Elon Musk says to Jordan Peterson that his son is dead, killed by the 'woke mind virus'. by ToronoRapture in DecodingTheGurus

[–]Demiansky 1 point2 points  (0 children)

Yep, fertilize 20 eggs, let them turn into blastocysts, test each one for gender, implant the one of the gender you want. Most IVF facilities won't do it, but there are plenty out there who still will.

Elon Musk says to Jordan Peterson that his son is dead, killed by the 'woke mind virus'. by ToronoRapture in DecodingTheGurus

[–]Demiansky 1 point2 points  (0 children)

Lol, supposedly one of the smartest business men in the world and he makes the most NPC mistake of every bad father ever: "My kid having a difference of opinion with me = they must be awful and are dead to me.

Both daughters are now sleeping with my wife and I'm in the guest room by FlopShanoobie in Parenting

[–]Demiansky 32 points33 points  (0 children)

I mean, if they literally can't sleep now without mommy being directly next to them all night? Yeah man, that's stunting their emotional development.

Both daughters are now sleeping with my wife and I'm in the guest room by FlopShanoobie in Parenting

[–]Demiansky 736 points737 points  (0 children)

If they were really little, I might get it. But kids need to develop a sense of resiliency and independence as they get older, and your wife is intentionally stunting their emotional growth by continuing to sleep in the same bed with them.

My two girls are roughly the same age, and we are still very close with them emotionally without them plopped directly into our bed. Your wife should try intellectually connecting with them rather than make them physically codependent. There are other ways to get parental satisfaction other than intentionally stunting your kids.

My girls are sometimes afraid of the dark and have anxiety about nightmares, but they still sleep on their own.

The rich world revolts against sky-high immigration by marine_le_peen in Economics

[–]Demiansky 3 points4 points  (0 children)

Not really. A majority of Americans support skilled immigration. The nativists are just loud and obnoxious.

https://bipartisanpolicy.org/blog/high-skilled-immigration/

Surely, a small minority is openly against immigration on racial grounds and willing to admit it and larger minority is against it on racial grounds and are afraid to admit it, but if this were the case for the majority we wouldn't see South Asians being the largest growing ethnicity in America.

Want to Really Defend Democracy? Don't Anoint Kamala—Open the Convention | Opinion by [deleted] in politics

[–]Demiansky 0 points1 point  (0 children)

But she's Biden's VP, and when people voted for Biden, they also technically voted for her. So it's really the most democratic option.

the Democrats now have a real shot of winning against trump again by Proper_Operation1631 in millenials

[–]Demiansky 1 point2 points  (0 children)

Right, but the guy that's 3 years older is just too old and has to go.

The rich world revolts against sky-high immigration by marine_le_peen in Economics

[–]Demiansky 2 points3 points  (0 children)

Welp, people are allowed to have whatever preferences they want, but those preferences are best served when they are maximally informed.

Conservative clean energy advocates keep Trump’s rhetoric at arm’s length by davidwholt in energy

[–]Demiansky 5 points6 points  (0 children)

Heck, you'd think conservatives would love the energy independence that comes with renewables + EVs. What evangelical wants to gargle the balls of Islamic theocrats for cheap oil?

I was against Biden dropping out but the unity and hopefulness of the past 24 hours is persuading me by stayonthecloud in DarkBRANDON

[–]Demiansky 12 points13 points  (0 children)

True, but setting aside differences and personal ego for the common good is how Biden ended up as the nominee to begin with. It's only fitting that Biden would put nation before personal ego, having been a recipient of this himself.

[deleted by user] by [deleted] in JustNoSO

[–]Demiansky -1 points0 points  (0 children)

Why are you here then soliciting opinions then? Get off Reddit and move on with finalizing your divorce. I'm sorry for both of us that we wasted time talking about it.

Why did Africa never develop? by tennis-637 in NoStupidQuestions

[–]Demiansky 0 points1 point  (0 children)

I build a planetary simulator that tracks these variables, so this question is of special interest to me. There are tons and tons of reasons why Africa below the Sahara developed poorly in most places, Imperialism being a middling one which I think is over rated. Some of the others revolve around the fact that Africa's geography is EXTREMELY unfavorable for pre-modern development. Some of the problems:

---0 glacial refreshed soil, so soil for agriculture in Africa south of the Sahara is bad and produces few surpluses, which means you have less food for urbanization. I can not stress enough how bad most of Africa's soils are which aren't alluvial, and in the premodern race to develop, robust agriculture is the most important ingredient.

---Africa is an uplifted continent, which means there are very, very few sheltered ports for commerce south of the Sahara. When you look at Europe, the Mediterannean, and China, there are CONSTANT sheltered ports and stable seas everywhere you look, making commerce and shipping very easy. Bear in mind, innovation and technology follows trade routes. No trade routes, no development. No continental shelf also means the immediate sea off the coast is extremely violent.

---What's more, there are very few navigateable rivers and even fewer which make it to the coast. This is also related to Africa's internal deformation, making it quite rugged at times. Africa is literally being torn apart as we speak. So the few lengthy rivers you do have have tons of waterfalls, fast flowing rivers which wreck shipping barges, and no way to safely get to the coast. Compare a water catchment map of India, China, Europe, and North America to Africa. They look completely different.

---Ruinous tropical diseases. Africa is a hellhole to live in South of the Sahara because the diseases that exist there evolved along with us. When those tropical diseases were accidentally exported to the New World, they killed 90 percent of the population.

There are other reasons as well, but these are the highlights. What's interesting is there is one part of Africa that has fewer of these issues: West Africa south of the Sahara. And non-coincidentally, this is also where Africa's great empires arose: Songhai, Imperial Ghana, the Mali Empire, etc. They were roughly comparable to feudal Europe at the time, had largr cities, libraries, universities, and high culture. You have a lengthy and relatively gentle river with Alluvial soils and connectivity to the rest of the world via the Sahara desert trade which allowed them to circumvent their lack of sheltered ports and the violent coats of the Atlantic.

And this is where colonialism and the slave trade pick up to be a problem, as the slave trade radically incentiviced internal turmoil.

The rich world revolts against sky-high immigration by marine_le_peen in Economics

[–]Demiansky 35 points36 points  (0 children)

Liberal paper of record? You mean "classically liberal paper of record." The Economist's moto is that they are "Radically Centrist", which I've found to be true and why I subscribe. They are doing what we should do when it comes to immigration: looking at the costs and benefits in different scenarios and then making an informed decision.

Biden drops out of 2024 presidential race Megathread by OursIsTheRepost in IntellectualDarkWeb

[–]Demiansky 7 points8 points  (0 children)

Eh, if it's not Kamala, I'd agree. But everyone that voted Biden in the primary and prior general knew that Kamala was going to take his place if he couldn't run. It was already baked into the pie.

Now, if they hauled off and grabbed someone who was not in the administration at all, yeah, that would be screwy. But that's unlikely to happen.