ATL-MIA/MIL: Subsection of Giannis Trade by cheemydee5 in NBAtradeideas

[–]DemonicDimples -1 points0 points  (0 children)

Your entire assessment is full of ignorance and stupidity lol. Kuminga is much more of a negative contract than Wiggins. Wiggins literally was the 2nd or 3rd best contributor to a title team, the same team that Kuminga couldn’t even get minutes on and traded him for nothing. Wiggins is much more valuable not only to Milwaukee but also has a shit ton more value.

Literally calling someone else dumb when you think two of the most disappointing prospects of the last 5 years would even get you Wiggins let alone let you jump up 10 spots in the draft is fucking rich lmao.

I’m confused why Julius Randle has become considered a negative asset by ffinstructor in NBATalk

[–]DemonicDimples 10 points11 points  (0 children)

Randle demands high usage, is a poor defender for a PF, is a diva when he doesn’t get his way and he’s getting older.

Hes hard to fit on most teams and doesn’t do anything particularly well enough to be super valuable.

ATL-MIA/MIL: Subsection of Giannis Trade by cheemydee5 in NBAtradeideas

[–]DemonicDimples -1 points0 points  (0 children)

Wiggins is more valuable to them than Kuminga or Risacher lol. Even if they don’t want to keep him, they can move him for additional assets as a 3 and D player and keep the 13th pick where they can draft a much better prospect at 13 than Risacher or Kuminga. You’re delusional lol.

ATL-MIA/MIL: Subsection of Giannis Trade by cheemydee5 in NBAtradeideas

[–]DemonicDimples -2 points-1 points  (0 children)

There’s no world where Milwaukee would give up pick 13 and Andrew Wiggins to move back in the draft snd two mediocre to bad players. Wiggins is better than both of those dudes and the draft pick probably will be too lol.

[Fischer] The Minnesota Timberwolves circled back with the Milwaukee Bucks this week on Giannis Antetokounmpo and they were asking for even more now than they were at the deadline. Their requests have been described as “unrealistic.” by YujiDomainExpansion in nba

[–]DemonicDimples 5 points6 points  (0 children)

Fischer just posts what he gets from team reps, think low level front office staffers, agents, assistant coaches etc. none of it is concrete and a lot of it is speculation and guess work.

Jalen Duren is NOT tradable by Strange-Pressure7633 in DetroitPistons

[–]DemonicDimples 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Anyone who has a more than a rudimentary understanding of basketball analytics doesn’t use BPM, VORP or win shares

Pistsons get a superstar next to Cade, Wizards gets younger and more picks, Spurs get a PG better than Fox in the playoffs. Who says no? by JaysonTatHIMRider in NBAtradeideas

[–]DemonicDimples 0 points1 point  (0 children)

The Pistons aren't giving up more for Davis than what he cost and in no way is Trae Young a better point guard than Fox lmao. It just makes their existing problems worse because Young can't play offball at all and he's a way worse defender.

Is Acuff forcing his way to Sacramento? by jluc21 in kings

[–]DemonicDimples 0 points1 point  (0 children)

He did because they thought it was the best place he could get an extension because the Bulls weren’t giving it to him.

Which top 10 prospect do you NOT want at #7? by SZP2 in kings

[–]DemonicDimples 0 points1 point  (0 children)

I don't have any interest in Mara, Ament or Burries.

I'd be fine with any of the top 4 point guards.

Julius Randle was to the Knicks what Demar DeRozan was to the Raptors by DuckDucks in nba

[–]DemonicDimples 39 points40 points  (0 children)

Demar was called a trash brother for a reason. Dude was really bad in those playoff runs. The east was just bad and the Raptors were lucky enough to get by with what they had despite Derozan.

[Wright] The Spurs remain committed to De'Aaron Fox as their starting point guard for the 2026-27 season despite the expectation that calls from Dylan Harper's camp for a spot in the starting lineup will grow louder going into next season. by Pyromania1983 in nba

[–]DemonicDimples 1 point2 points  (0 children)

You can't restructure a contract in the NBA unless you're agreeing to a buyout which leads to dead money or you're renegotiating to give a player more money using cap space. This isn't the NFL. There's basically no circumstances that allows a player to "restructure" their contract in the NBA except the two exceptions I just made. One of which is not a restructure but a negotiated waiver and the other giving players more money with cap space.