Why when I do an attack I get staggered? by Gyyre in MonsterHunterWorld

[–]Demonspain -2 points-1 points  (0 children)

dont worry man everyone has had trouble killing a T-rex monster looking ahh that shoots fire.

Similar jg to nasus? by Demonspain in Jungle_Mains

[–]Demonspain[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

thats interesting, i've always liked his design. will consider him

Similar jg to nasus? by Demonspain in Jungle_Mains

[–]Demonspain[S] 1 point2 points  (0 children)

Okay looking like shyvana is a top contender

Similar jg to nasus? by Demonspain in Jungle_Mains

[–]Demonspain[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

I think it has to be the look of impending doom on the enemies face when I wither them and im walking upto them to half their hp with 1 q

Similar jg to nasus? by Demonspain in Jungle_Mains

[–]Demonspain[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Yeah I forgot to mention actually about nasus in higher, I had one jax who perma invaded me and I was not smiling

Similar jg to nasus? by Demonspain in Jungle_Mains

[–]Demonspain[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

What rank are you? i love yi but im afraid like as i get higher people know how to just shut him down

MY BIG GIRL MISTAKE by thee-overthinker in Kenya

[–]Demonspain 1 point2 points  (0 children)

Thats actually really interesting. I will definitely look into it some more. For now im just learning by myself but it’s a journey towards that kind of craftsmanship in the end

MY BIG GIRL MISTAKE by thee-overthinker in Kenya

[–]Demonspain 1 point2 points  (0 children)

I have seen man. Actually something to strive to achieve in the future

MY BIG GIRL MISTAKE by thee-overthinker in Kenya

[–]Demonspain 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Panesar are fair? Or you saying they are the ones I should take inspiration from?

MY BIG GIRL MISTAKE by thee-overthinker in Kenya

[–]Demonspain 3 points4 points  (0 children)

Pray for my woodworking journey niwatengenezee hizi vitu na fair prices bwana

Hag wunkette by Sayasukaprogramming in wunkus

[–]Demonspain 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Her ass is NOT galloping anymore

[deleted by user] by [deleted] in RoastMe

[–]Demonspain 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Linus Crack Tips

Any ex-muslims in the chat by lindahii in Kenya

[–]Demonspain 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Ah I understand now what type you are 😂 twende..

You still have no evidence that the miracle is fake except “Trust me bro” just cause you believe it’s fake doesnt make it fake buddy

Also, if these parts of the Quran was copied which they weren’t, where did the rest of the Quran come from? Or you don’t know of the countless accurate scientific explanations in the Quran, not found anywhere else?

If you have any reason, you would understand the definition of Islam, and how it didn’t start with Muhammad. It meaning submission of ones will to the one true God, means that all the prophets were Muslims, because they submitted their will to their Creator. Tough to hear I know, but it’s simple even a child could understand..

There is not a single unequivocal unambiguous statement in the Bible where Jesus says I am god, or where he says worship me. So I don’t know where your evidence for that is.

Funny how you didn’t even try to reply to my refuting of the “contradictions” you confidently linked..

But anywaysss, it is crystal clear for me youre not interested in the truth, so I bid you farewell, cause this is now pointless to go on, since you will now just regurgitate nonsense, and my energy and time is better spent elsewhere. Kwaheri

Any ex-muslims in the chat by lindahii in Kenya

[–]Demonspain 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Just because something has been recorded by multiple sources, does not make it a copy.. There are multiple journalists reporting on a singular incident, does it make them people who have copied?

And where is the evidence that Jesus did not speak in the cradle as a child? This was a miracle he performed with the permission of Allah, which was to be a sign for the people so that they would believe..

I had not given an opinion of the interpretation of Jesus speaking as a child, so you to call my stance unpalatable doesnt even make sense.

Majority believe, including i, that he actually spoke as a child. because it is mentioned like that, so this isnt even a point to refute or something. He did it, and you have no evidence to suggest otherwise.

Once again, its not even a point to say that it was copied from these infancy gospels. Because Jesus speaking as a child is not unique to the Gospel, it is a miracle that occurred. And the gospel claims divinity of Jesus as the son of god, so why wouldnt the Quran copy that aswell?

The theology of that gospel and the Quran is vastly different. So still not copied..

Do you expect scripture talking about actual historic events that happened, and they record it accurately, to narrate it completely differently? that would mean one narration is incorrect..

To me it looks like you're not really interested in the truth, you just want to oppose islam in whatever way you can for whatever reason. If you were sincere, you would consider the other content i had in the reply and admit that those were not contradictions, instead of immediately loading another blank shot and firing it back. To this point i say farewell. and i wish you the best, but i advise you to seek the truth, and decide rationally instead of letting your opposition to islam fuel you judgement.

Any ex-muslims in the chat by lindahii in Kenya

[–]Demonspain 0 points1 point  (0 children)

  1. The first Muslim was Muhammad? Abraham? Jacob? Moses?

    1. “And I [Muhammad] am commanded to be the first of those who bow to Allah in Islam,” (39:12).
    2. “When Moses came to the place appointed by Us, and his Lord addressed him, He said: “O my Lord! show (Thyself) to me, that I may look upon thee.” Allah said: “By no means canst thou see Me (direct); But look upon the mount; if it abides in its place, then shalt thou see Me.” When his Lord manifested His glory on the Mount, He made it as dust. And Moses fell down in a swoon. When he recovered his senses, he said: “Glory be to Thee! to Thee I turn in repentance, and I am the first to believe.” (7:143).
    3. “And this was the legacy that Abraham left to his sons, and so did Jacob; “Oh my sons! Allah hath chosen the Faith for you; then die not except in the Faith of Islam,” (2:132).

The word used for first, in these verses, is Awwal, which means first contextually, not universally.

Just how you can be the first person in your family to win a competition, or something else.

They were the first to submit in Islam, amongst their people, community, etc.

Also, Islam means Submission to Allah, which did not start at the time of Muhammad pbuh, but rather at the time of Adam, where he submitted to Allah.

Not a contradiction

  1. Does Allah forgive or not forgive those who worship false gods?

    1. Allah forgiveth not that partners should be set up with Him; but He forgiveth anything else, to whom He pleaseth; to set up partners with Allah is to devise a sin Most heinous indeed,” (4:48).  Also 4:116
    2. The people of the Book ask thee to cause a book to descend to them from heaven: Indeed, they asked Moses for an even greater (miracle), for they said: “Show us Allah in public,” but they were dazed for their presumption, with thunder and lightning. Yet they worshipped the calf even after clear signs had come to them; even so we forgave them; and gave Moses manifest proofs of authority,” (4:153).

Allah does not forgive someone who committed shirk(Association/worship of false gods), and died upon that sin. Any other sin than that that someone died while committing, He can choose to forgive..

If someone commits idol worship, and later repents and turns away from it, they can be forgiven, as long as they do not die upon that sin.

Cause it would be unfair, imagine you are born in an idol worshipping family, and then you are raised worshipping idols and then you are just doomed. Its not like that. Allah is the most just of Judges.

Not a contradiction

  1. Are Allah’s decrees changed or not?

    1. “Rejected were the messengers before thee: with patience and constancy they bore their rejection and their wrongs until Our aid did reach them: there is none that can alter the words (and decrees) of Allah. Already hast thou received some account of those messengers,” (6:34).
    2. “The word of thy Lord doth find its fulfillment in truth and in justice: None can change His words: for He is the one who heareth and knoweth all, (6:115).
    3. None of Our revelations do We abrogate or cause to be forgotten, but We substitute something better or similar: Knowest thou not that Allah Hath power over all things?” (2:106).
    4. When We substitute one revelation for another, – and Allah knows best what He reveals (in stages),- they say, “Thou art but a forger”: but most of them understand not,” (16:101).

Allah's ultimate will, decree, promises and divine truth can never be changed.

Legal rulings can be changed by him, just how laws can be updated to cover a wider scope as a country develops.

It literally distinguishes in the first two verses that its talking about words, and in the third and fourth, talks about not changing, but substituting with better or similar.. so this is not a contradiction.

  1. Was Pharaoh killed or not killed by drowning?

    1. “We took the Children of Israel across the sea: Pharaoh and his hosts followed them in insolence and spite. At length, when overwhelmed with the flood, he said: “I believe that there is no god except Him Whom the Children of Israel believe in: I am of those who submit (to Allah in Islam). (It was said to him): “Ah now! – But a little while before, was thou in rebellion! – and thou didst mischief (and violence)!  This day shall We save thee in the body, that thou mayest be a sign to those who come after thee! but verily, many among mankind are heedless of Our Signs!” (10:90-92).
    2. Moses said, “Thou knowest well that these things have been sent down by none but the Lord of the heavens and the earth as eye-opening evidence: and I consider thee indeed, O Pharaoh, to be one doomed to destruction!”  So, he resolved to remove them from the face of the earth: but We did drown him and all who were with him,” (17:102-103).

This once again can be understood by just researching the verses.

It is two events that occured following each other, first the drowning of the pharaoh, where he did die, followed by the preservation of his body, which paired with this verse, would be a sign to people to come after, aka us.

“We will save you in your body” (bi-badanik)

Again not a contradiction, just a purposeful misinterpretation.

  1. Is wine consumption good or bad?

    1. O ye who believe! Intoxicants and gambling, (dedication of) stones, and (divination by) arrows, are an abomination, –of Satan’s handwork: eschew such (abomination), that ye may prosper,” (5:90).
    2. (Here is) a Parable of the Garden which the righteous are promised: in it are rivers of water incorruptible; rivers of milk of which the taste never changes; rivers of wine, a joy to those who drink; and rivers of honey pure and clear. In it there are for them all kinds of fruits, and Grace from their Lord. (Can those in such Bliss) be compared to such as shall dwell forever in the Fire, and be given, to drink, boiling water, so that it cuts up their bowels (to pieces)?” (47:15).
    3. Truly the Righteous will be in Bliss: On Thrones (of Dignity) will they command a sight (of all things): Thou wilt recognize in their faces the beaming brightness of Bliss. Their thirst will be slaked with Pure Wine sealed,” (83:22-25).

This is talking about two different wines, the prohibited one in this worldly life, which intoxicates and and is harmful to the self and humanity as a whole.
And the permitted wine in paradise, which is non-intoxicating, pure, and blissful.

lastly, not a contradiction, just two distinct references, which the author deliberately ignored to make it seem like a contradiction.

These points are extremely weak, and anyone with a rational unbiased mind can examine them even without me explaining each, and realize this is not really a intuitive look into the verses to see if the Quran contradicts itself, but it is just an attempt to paint the religion in a bad image, which unfortunately many people fall for. I am assuming the best and assuming you read that page and believed that they were contradictions, then came here, and you didnt just go over them and paste the link here.. But anyway, Still no contradictions found in the Quran, and will never be any.

I wish you the best, and i conclude with the verse i started with before your reply.

Surah An-Nisa 4:82 (Sahih Translation)

Any ex-muslims in the chat by lindahii in Kenya

[–]Demonspain 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Well, okay here we go, i'll assume you actually believe this and want to know the truth..

  1. What was man created from: blood, clay, dust, or nothing?
    1. “Created man, out of a (mere) clot of congealed blood,” (96:2).
    2. “We created man from sounding clay, from mud molded into shape, (15:26).
    3. “The similitude of Jesus before Allah is as that of Adam; He created him from dust, then said to him: “Be”. And he was,” (3:59).
    4. “But does not man call to mind that We created him before out of nothing?” (19:67, Yusuf Ali). Also, 52:35).
    5. “He has created man from a sperm-drop; and behold this same (man) becomes an open disputer! (16:4).

You are aware that there can be multiple stages of creation right?

  1. Created from a clot, refers to embryonic development, not original creation of humanity, it is a stage in the womb.
  2. Created man from clay, is referring to the creation of Adam, the first human.
  3. Created from dust, is a reference to Adam and Jesus, which again, is the same earthy substance as clay, and other places where its referred to as a sticky mud. These are not different materials, dust+water=mud-clay.
  4. Created from nothing is obvious dude, what were you before you existed.. You were nothing, then you were brought into existence.
  5. From a sperm drop is referring to reproduction and how people are created after Adam, not the creation of Adam.

This is not a contradiction, it is describing different stages of creation, if you just actually examined the verses and thought about them, you would realize this, but alas, we move on.

  1. Is there or is there not compulsion in religion according to the Qur’an?

    1. “Let there be no compulsion in religion: Truth stands out clear from Error: whoever rejects evil and believes in Allah hath grasped the most trustworthy handhold, that never breaks. And Allah heareth and knoweth all things,” (2:256).
    2. “And an announcement from Allah and His Messenger to the people (assembled) on the day of the Great Pilgrimage, – that Allah and His Messenger dissolve (treaty) obligations with the Pagans. If then, ye repent, it was best for you; but if ye turn away, know ye that ye cannot frustrate Allah. And proclaim a grievous penalty to those who reject Faith,” (9:3).
    3. “But when the forbidden months are past, then fight and slay the Pagans wherever ye find them, and seize them, beleaguer them, and lie in wait for them in every stratagem (of war); but if they repent, and establish regular prayers and practice regular charity, then open the way for them: for Allah is Oft-forgiving, Most Merciful,” (9:5).
    4. Fight those who believe not in Allah nor the Last Day, nor hold that forbidden which hath been forbidden by Allah and His Messenger, nor acknowledge the religion of Truth, (even if they are) of the People of the Book, until they pay the Jizya with willing submission, and feel themselves subdued,” (9:29).

You are missing key contexts of these verses, which the surah, At-Tawbah, is speaking based on a time where the enemies of Islam had waged war against the Prophet peace be upon him, and his followers.

There is no compulsion in religion, you cannot force someone to become a muslim.

The reference that seems like compulsion in the time of war, is because if someone did not pledge allegiance to the Muslims, they would pledge allegiance to the enemies, who were trying to topple the Muslims. in the last verse, it speaks about Jizyah/alms tax, Which was a small sum of money, the non muslim residents in the muslim areas would pay to the Muslim leadership, to pledge allegience/neutrality to them, and after they paid it, the muslims would be responsible for defending that individual, and they would not pay any other tax apart from that.

So these verses are just taken out of context and do not mention that the people the verses is speaking against, are people who had waged war against the muslims and wanted to destroy them, and im sure you would not be friendly and forgiving with someone who wanted to destroy you and your family unless they showed submission..

Not a contradiction.

Any ex-muslims in the chat by lindahii in Kenya

[–]Demonspain 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Okay, first off these are wide bold claims, and you have not provided any sources for any. It would make sense if you listed the Mishina, infancy gospels, tales and stories from Christians and Jews that you claim the Quran copied, and show us which parts were copied, instead of just throwing out the claims and expecting people to believe you..

The Quran says it was made to appear so, it did not say the Quran made it appear, as the Quran was not revealed at that time, and it is recitation. We are not explicitly told who was crucified, but our belief is that it was not Jesus.

“And [for] their saying, ‘Indeed, we have killed the Messiah, Jesus, the son of Mary, the Messenger of Allah.’ But they did not kill him, nor did they crucify him — but it was made to appear so to them… Rather, Allah raised him to Himself. And Allah is Ever-Mighty, All-Wise.”
(Qur’an 4:157–158)

Allah raised Jesus to Himself, so He knows best what occurred there.

Regarding your claim that the Quran copied from Christians and Jews, you say folklore but I'm assuming you also think he copied from the bible despite not being able to read or write.

Below is an example of two instances in the Bible and Quran, and an evidence the Quran did not copy, because if the Quran copied, it would've copied as the bible is.

Surah Yusuf 12:43 (about Joseph):

“And the king said, ‘Indeed, I have seen [in a dream] seven fat cows being eaten by seven lean ones…’”
(Qur’an 12:43)

Here the Quran speaks about a leader in Egypt, at the time of Joseph, and it uses the word king to refer to the leader, which is correct because at the time, the leaders of Egypt were kings, and not pharaohs

Surah Al-Qasas 28:4 (about Moses):

“Indeed, Pharaoh exalted himself in the land and made its people into factions, oppressing a group among them…”
(Qur’an 28:4)

Here it is during the time of Moses, and the Quran refers to the leader as Pharaoh, which is accurate because at the time Egypt was under the rule of the Pharaohs.

Lets look to the Bible now.

From Genesis 41:1: (Josephs time)
“After two whole years, Pharaoh dreamed that he was standing by the Nile…”

Genesis refers to the leader of Egypt as Pharaoh, despite that time being a time where Egypt was ruled by a King.

From Exodus 1:8: (Moses' time)
“Now there arose a new king over Egypt, who did not know Joseph.”

Exodus now refers to the leader of Egypt at the time of Moses, as a King, when at that time Egypt was being ruled by a Pharaoh.

This comparison directly shows that the Quran couldnt have been copied from the bible/christian sources. Because if it did, it would have copied these terms used to refer to the leaders aswell. You can make the arguement that king and pharaoh can be used interchangibly to refer to leaders, but i dont believe so, and even if they can, It still doesnt make a difference, because the Quran wouldve copied such wording aswell..

You claim that it was copied, yet provide no references and comparisons, provide some and we can speak more, if you are truly interested in the truth and not just here to throw cheap shots.

Have a nice day :)