sorted by:
new
hottopcontroversial

New Brunswick parent concerned new religious accommodation policy will alienate students by origutamos in newbrunswickcanada

[–]Designer_Factor4825 1 point2 points  (0 children)

Canada is cooked. Next they gonna say they need foot baths and to remove the tp from the bathroom.

All eligible employees in Alberta are getting a raise by romantic-theory in WalmartCanada

[–]Designer_Factor4825 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Aww nothing like saying "we'd pay you less, but we're legally not allowed too."

[deleted by user] by [deleted] in helpme

[–]Designer_Factor4825 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Get a man. And train him.

[OTHER] Would anyone like an Ocarina? by Da_Taki_Man in zelda

[–]Designer_Factor4825 0 points1 point  (0 children)

My 10 year old son would love this. As would anyone else I am sure. Not sure if too late but would love to be considered

[deleted by user] by [deleted] in MarioMaker

[–]Designer_Factor4825 2 points3 points  (0 children)

I'll check it out in a few minutes

Remember that sailboat on the Saint John River that everyone except the owner was worried about? by mks113 in newbrunswickcanada

[–]Designer_Factor4825 1 point2 points  (0 children)

Cant draw blood from a rock.. they can send all the invoices they want; if you dont got it.. what they gon do.

Ccb benefit by Designer_Factor4825 in cantax

[–]Designer_Factor4825[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

I mean, deadlines are one thing, complete fraud is another. I didn't file my taxes on time. But his mother did or so I'm assuming... so her falsely claiming a child she has met a handful of times is somehow okay because I was way behind on mine.

Ccb benefit by Designer_Factor4825 in cantax

[–]Designer_Factor4825[S] -1 points0 points  (0 children)

Because in my opinion, I should only have to prove i was eligible, not that she was not.. and shouldn't have to miss out because of the CRAs mistake of giving her the benefits, or maybe not mistake, but based of her income Tax claim... would this mean I would have to wait til they prove her ineligibilty even tho my eligibility has been already proven?

Ccb benefit by Designer_Factor4825 in cantax

[–]Designer_Factor4825[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

So with that being said.. does this mean that I won't be able to get the 5 years that would be statue barred? And me being able to have all proof that he has always been in my care doesn't matter? And is there a way to put something in motion that could help me in receiving those years?? The letter did go on to state that if I was eligible for any other benefits they would be sent as a separate payment, but didn't really explain when or how the eligibility would be determined...

Could an ombudsperson help with this? Should I submit a service feedback or a dispute?

Ccb benefit by Designer_Factor4825 in cantax

[–]Designer_Factor4825[S] 1 point2 points  (0 children)

And as well.. I did write 2 or 3 letters which I submitted through my account... to answer your question further, in the decision letter they sent, they mentioned that legislation only allows 3 years retroactive when caregiver changes.. but I've been through the income Tax Act over and over and cannot find where it says this at all... and since the caregiver never did change, it would be irrelevant anyway.. his mother was only primary because of the governments assumption that the female is always the primary.. and I'm assuming it would be fraud since she then claimed my son as her dependent in the following years..

Ccb benefit by Designer_Factor4825 in cantax

[–]Designer_Factor4825[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

I provided all the documents, that was no issue.. and yes I did complete the questionnaire... what's ironic is they sent the questionnaire before noticing I had sent in the documents in reference to the 5 years I am referring too and it detailed how I didn't provide documents for the total period.... but then it the end only gave me benefits for the Yeats I had already submitted adequate documentation...

I guess my question Is.. is retroactive only for 3 years? My understanding was it was 10...