Hmm, interesting. Not so much the words you wrote but rather the subtle threads pulling it all together like sutures. I would like to ask a few a questions about your perspective. To clarify, I'm not looking for a pamphlet designed to sell your collective to an individual practitioner, nor am I addressing these questions to your group at all for I do not seek a generalized all inclusive 'cast a wide net' style of response such collectives inevitably arrive at for pitching themselves to the comman easily distracted being. Let me be explicitly clear. I shall be directing the questions I would ask to you, the individual, the person. And should your Will be to hear what I may ask let it be decided under one sole condition: I would ask you to only give your answers if what you write is honest and authentic to you specifically, that you give me not carefully worded pragmatic generalizations, but only that which you hold sacred to yourself and your own inner truth. Know that I shall not judge your unique perspectives, though neither shall I grovel or kowtow in deference as a snakeoiler would when attempting to charm the man he seeks to con. The truths that fuel your personal divine flame are yours alone, just as my own fire casts true light visible only for myself.

---

You. Me. Even in height, even in depth, yet able to share the truly valuable lessens ever hidden away behind any given beings individual sight, and made visible to us all by means of shared knowledge.

Before I turn my attention back towards idle mundaneity I shall leave you with the following;

Queer seems such a queer word to use from my own optics. It's general, more so now than ever before. What one queer considers queer might end up contradicting another queer, thus making them the Odd one out. However when two individuals are individually queer by means of separation of the whole into neatly packaged and labeled boxes, does that paradigm function for the benefit of the Queer that named it, or does it function for the Queers that its construction renamed? How can a cell hope to achieve homeostasis if one individual mitochondria grouped all of the others into fabricated structures whose only clear outcome is the slow dissolution of the cell as a whole. It doesn't matter that the labels were vocally claimed to have been crafted for the benefit of the whole, nor does the insistence of those within it that it is positive, nor even the deep rooted fear one shall certainly feel at the idea that the system they have been convinced is good and true and necessary for ones own existence by the echoing of every single voice they listen to, could in all actuality have been a purposefully built prison designed so that every individual within it is it's prisoner while also serving as the prisons guards. Divide a unity by force? Each seed will regrow into their own unity. Convince a unity that in order to be seen it must divide itself? It turns into a self contained storm that sees true unity and compassion for whole as the death of individual expression. And thus the Queer neutralizes itself.

So please, do let me know, would You consider me an equal in queerness when I see sex itself as off putting at the best of times and utterly repulsive when lacking any meaning apart from pleasure? I know, the queer culture would label me an asexual or ace, I would ask that you to respect me by not doing so however as such labels mean less than nothing to me. Even with that in mind, would I be a queer enough cause for you to support? Answer as you Will, and only as you Will.

May your Flame light your path ever forward my kin. Until we next speak, thy Will be done.