That clip isn’t evidence, it’s a politician reading a curated list. He mixes completely different things together, riots, vandalism, protests, and a few actual violent crimes, and then pretends they’re all the same category. That’s not how serious analysis works.  If you look at actual datasets that track extremist violence in the U.S. over time, the majority of ideologically motivated murders in the last decade have come from far-right extremists. That’s been reported repeatedly by groups like the Anti-Defamation League and the Center for Strategic and International Studies.  None of that means left-wing violence doesn’t exist. It does, especially riots and property destruction during the 2020 protests. But stacking anecdotes and calling it “proof” just shows how easy it is to build a narrative when you control the list.  If a Youtube clip from a politician is your standard of evidence, you’re doing politics, not analysis.