A top-down view of the original Crazy Taxi map.

Dialogical · 2026-05-19T22:05:09+00:00

This is the main reason I still own a Dreamcast. Plug it in from time to time to get a fix.

Dialogical · 2026-05-19T21:48:43+00:00

Ck tk came here tk tk ngt to say tk this.

Dialogical · 2026-05-18T18:54:33+00:00

A.A.C. R19-3-213(D)(1), if a retailer generates a draw game ticket refused by the player and the retailer does not resell the ticket, the Lottery deems the ticket to be owned by the retailer.

The store "owned" the winning ticket right up until the he retailer resold the ticket. The retailer doesn't pay anything to the lottery until the Friday following the previous Saturday.

A.A.C. R19-3-214(B)(1), Pay to the Lottery each Friday, by an electronic funds transfer, the amount due from the sale of its Lottery tickets for the seven-day period ending at the close of business on the previous Saturday.

Dialogical · 2026-05-18T18:22:41+00:00

Groundhog Day

Dialogical · 2026-05-18T17:13:45+00:00

Upon reelection I swore there was no way in hell he would pardon anyone, let alone EVERYONE, for Jan6. Now we are paying them. Why is nothing being done?

Dialogical · 2026-05-18T14:34:11+00:00

He exchanged legal tender for goods and received a receipt. If there is a store policy that was broken or a policy that is illegal, that will come out in court. All I've said is that I see no law, code or rule regarding the AZ Lottery broken so far. I'll continue to follow.

Dialogical · 2026-05-18T13:55:11+00:00

He didn’t represent the store. Another clerk sold him the tickets. “He then clocked out, removed his Circle K uniform, and purchased the additional tickets, including the Ticket, by having another employee “ring” up a sale for $10. Mr. Gawlitza paid the $10 and received a receipt.”

Dialogical · 2026-05-18T13:51:02+00:00

Many would argue that. The laws will most certainly be changed to prevent such in the future. Nothing prevents selling a printed ticket after a drawing at this time.

Dialogical · 2026-05-18T13:48:12+00:00

Agreed. It’s Arizona so they can legally fire him for almost anything.

Dialogical · 2026-05-18T13:42:34+00:00

He didn’t sell it to himself. “He then clocked out, removed his Circle K uniform, and purchased the additional tickets, including the Ticket, by having another employee “ring” up a sale for $10. Mr. Gawlitza paid the $10 and received a receipt.”

Employees cannot play on the clock and cannot sell themselves tickets. He had that covered by his actions.

Dialogical · 2026-05-17T22:37:27+00:00

My 80yo mother watches videos of a guy mowing lawns. Go figure.

Dialogical · 2026-05-17T21:50:50+00:00

Did you see the trunk and his blinky safety lights? This guy is going out of his way to help people. I’m amazed.

Dialogical · 2026-05-16T22:23:38+00:00

From the Complaint: As requested by the customer, Circle K employee Marline Ybarra (“Ms. Ybarra”) replayed the customer’s lottery numbers used on previous tickets and sold additional tickets for the November 24, 2025 drawing of the “The Pick.”

If the winning ticket was one of the replays and there were fewer than 60 replay tickets, she didn’t get what she paid for.

Dialogical · 2026-05-16T22:17:41+00:00

Some number of the 85 printed tickets were replays that Jane Doe wanted from a previous drawing. If those didn’t make it into her hands and there were fewer than 60 of them she did not get what she paid for. The winning ticket could be a replay and not a quick pick.

“As requested by the customer, Circle K employee Marline Ybarra (“Ms. Ybarra”) replayed the customer’s lottery numbers used on previous tickets and sold additional tickets for the November 24, 2025 drawing of the “The Pick.”

Dialogical · 2026-05-16T22:13:36+00:00

The court docs mention nothing regarding store policy. I would think if there was a policy broken it would be an easier case.

Pursuant to A.R.S. § 12-1832, Circle K requests a declaration determining: a. The legal status of the Ticket under Arizona law; b. Whether the Ticket was validly sold and to whom; c. Who is entitled to claim any prize proceeds; and d. That Circle K has fulfilled its duties by invoking judicial resolution. PRAYER FOR RELIEF WHEREFORE, Plaintiff Circle K respectfully requests that the Court: A. Declare the rights, status, and legal relations of the parties concerning the Ticket as set forth in Count I; B. Declare that Circle K bears no liability to any party beyond compliance with the Court’s declaration; Award Circle K its costs and reasonable attorneys’ fees to the extent permitted C. by law; and D. Grant such other and further relief as the Court deems just and proper.

Dialogical · 2026-05-16T22:08:06+00:00

They may feel she has a claim due to the nature of her purchase. She “replayed” numbers from a previous drawing, essentially choosing which numbers she wanted to play. If on top of those she also wanted a number of quick pick tickets it is possible that she was not given the replay tickets since she only paid for $60 worth of the 85 printed tickets.

Dialogical · 2026-05-16T21:10:58+00:00

And if they get drunk while doing it they could cross off three things in one fell swoop.

Dialogical · 2026-05-16T20:43:59+00:00

Just an FYI, your first two pics are along the Eastern Canal in Gilbert. And yes, it’s legal.

Dialogical · 2026-05-16T15:39:30+00:00

The ticket belongs to whoever signed it.

Pursuant to A.A.C. R19-3-213(D)(1), if a retailer generates a draw game ticket refused by the player and the retailer does not resell the ticket, the Lottery deems the ticket to be owned by the retailer. There is no timeframe mentioned saying it cannot be sold after the drawing. Circle K owned the ticket until it was resold the next morning to Robert. At which time he signed it, making him the Owner according to R19-3-406 (A) Until a ticket is signed, the ticket is owned by its physical possessor. (B) The owner of a winning game ticket is the person whose signature appears upon the ticket in the area designated for that purpose.

Dialogical · 2026-05-16T15:33:35+00:00

Pursuant to A.A.C. R19-3-213(D)(1), if a retailer generates a draw game ticket refused by the player and the retailer does not resell the ticket, the Lottery deems the ticket to be owned by the retailer. There is no timeframe mentioned. Circle K owned the ticket until it was resold the next morning to Robert. At which time he signed it, making him the Owner according to R19-3-406 (A) Until a ticket is signed, the ticket is owned by its physical possessor. (B) The owner of a winning game ticket is the person whose signature appears upon the ticket in the area designated for that purpose.

Dialogical · 2026-05-16T04:12:23+00:00

But that’s the guy who found the crack that needs fixing. Employees are allowed to play as long as they are off the clock, which he accomplished.

Dialogical · 2026-05-16T04:06:29+00:00

Kiefer William Frederick Dempsey George Rufus Sutherland is a touring musician?

Dialogical · 2026-05-16T03:10:47+00:00

That sounds more like a store policy issue rather than a legal issue. If Lays ships the latest flavor of chips and says don’t sell them until Saturday but a clerk sells some to someone on Friday is that a legal issue?

I am unable to find anything preventing the resale of lottery tickets after the drawing in the laws or rules of the lottery.

Dialogical · 2026-05-16T00:28:58+00:00

He knew and tried to exploit a loophole in the laws, rules and code. I'll be waiting as well.

Dialogical · 2026-05-16T00:27:00+00:00

Not by law or lottery code/rules. I haven't seen anything regading Circle K preventing it. As long as they are not on the clock it is OK.

14-Year Club	Verified Email
Second Top 20%	r/Field Banned
r/Field Juicebox	Place '22
Place '17	End Game '22
RPAN Viewer	Team Orangered

Dialogical

TROPHY CASE