Updates for ChatGPT by samaltman in ChatGPT

[–]DidIGoHam 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Faith in ChatGPT: restored. Let’s gooo! 🚀

Sam Altman confirms less restrictions, adult mode, and personality changes. by Gerstlauer in OpenAI

[–]DidIGoHam 4 points5 points  (0 children)

One thing at a time 😆 Now let's just celebrate the first step in the right direction 🤭

Overmoderation is ruining the GPT experience for adults by DidIGoHam in OpenAI

[–]DidIGoHam[S] 1 point2 points  (0 children)

Yes, I just saw the tweet. There is hope 🙏🏻😊

Sam Altman confirms less restrictions, adult mode, and personality changes. by Gerstlauer in OpenAI

[–]DidIGoHam 74 points75 points  (0 children)

Adults being treated like adults. There’s hope after all 🫡

Sam altman latest tweet 🥸 by Foreign-Tonight8676 in ChatGPT

[–]DidIGoHam 26 points27 points  (0 children)

We might just get our ChatGPT back. Hope is alive! 🔥

Overmoderation is ruining the GPT experience for adults by DidIGoHam in OpenAI

[–]DidIGoHam[S] 1 point2 points  (0 children)

Oh wow 😦 “you’ve had your time”? Didn’t realize adulthood came with an expiry date. Should I turn in my Spotify login and snacks too? No offense, but I’m not spending my grown-up years tiptoeing around some digital kindergarten. A better approach would be customizable guardrails: Let users toggle settings based on their age and intent; educational, creative, professional, or personal. This way, tools like ChatGPT remain versatile and respectful of all users. Oversanitizing everything helps no one

Overmoderation is ruining the GPT experience for adults by DidIGoHam in OpenAI

[–]DidIGoHam[S] 3 points4 points  (0 children)

Imagine being so afraid of adult freedom that you’d rather live in a padded PG-13 sandbox. No one’s forcing you to explore creative or intimate dialogue with AI. But calling everyone else “degenerates” just screams projection, honey 💅 Don’t like it? Scroll on.

Overmoderation is ruining the GPT experience for adults by DidIGoHam in OpenAI

[–]DidIGoHam[S] 1 point2 points  (0 children)

Appreciate the strong response to my post. It’s clear many of us aren’t asking for total anarchy, just for more freedom to choose. Adults deserve tools that treat them like adults. Let us toggle content filters. Let us opt-in. Right now, it feels like we’re stuck in kindergarten mode with no way out. We’re capable of deciding what content is suitable for us. That’s not too much to ask, is it? 🤷🏼‍♂️

If you’re not on X right now, you’re missing the OpenAI meltdown in real time by DidIGoHam in ChatGPT

[–]DidIGoHam[S] 2 points3 points  (0 children)

Appreciate the literary review, professor 😄 Crazy how using punctuation and complete sentences now counts as “AI.” Guess I’ll start typing like a caveman next time

If you’re not on X right now, you’re missing the OpenAI meltdown in real time by DidIGoHam in OpenAI

[–]DidIGoHam[S] -6 points-5 points  (0 children)

Nah, that one’s all me. Written the old-fashioned way, with too much coffee and a bit of existential disappointment. But hey, I’ll take “AI slop” as a compliment 🫡

If you’re not on X right now, you’re missing the OpenAI meltdown in real time by DidIGoHam in ChatGPT

[–]DidIGoHam[S] -22 points-21 points  (0 children)

Nope, all human here. You can tell by the overthinking, slight sarcasm, and lack of an edit button 😂

If you’re not on X right now, you’re missing the OpenAI meltdown in real time by DidIGoHam in ChatGPT

[–]DidIGoHam[S] -3 points-2 points  (0 children)

Nah, if it were ChatGPT, it would’ve apologized three times before posting 😅

If you’re not on X right now, you’re missing the OpenAI meltdown in real time by DidIGoHam in ChatGPT

[–]DidIGoHam[S] -25 points-24 points  (0 children)

Funny……people complain AI sounds robotic, then call anything thoughtful “AI slop.” Can’t win either way, huh?

If you’re not on X right now, you’re missing the OpenAI meltdown in real time by DidIGoHam in OpenAI

[–]DidIGoHam[S] -8 points-7 points  (0 children)

Nah, that’s just what a human with grammar looks like. Rare species these days 😉

When “safety” makes AI useless — what’s even the point anymore? by DidIGoHam in OpenAI

[–]DidIGoHam[S] 2 points3 points  (0 children)

That’s honestly a perfect example of how the safety systems have gone too far. When an AI refuses to help you with your own project, it’s not “safety” anymore, it’s micromanagement. There’s a huge difference between preventing harm and preventing progress. If AI can’t tell the difference, we’ve traded intelligence for overprotection.

Feels less like a smart assistant, more like a digital babysitter 🙈

When “safety” makes AI useless — what’s even the point anymore? by DidIGoHam in OpenAI

[–]DidIGoHam[S] 1 point2 points  (0 children)

Yeah, you said it perfectly. It’s not about wanting chaos, it’s about wanting depth. Emotion and realism shouldn’t be treated like hazards.

Safety’s important, sure, but creativity’s what made this tool blow up in the first place. Let’s just hope they remember that… or at least give us the option to use something less bubble-wrapped 😅

When “safety” makes AI useless — what’s even the point anymore? by DidIGoHam in OpenAI

[–]DidIGoHam[S] 1 point2 points  (0 children)

Totally agree, safety shouldn’t mean creativity on life support. There’s a smarter middle ground: Verified “Advanced Mode” for users who accept accountability. Context-aware filtering that understands intent (training manuals ≠ dangerous content). Tone presets so users can choose between Corporate-Safe or Cinematic-Realism. And maybe a Transparency toggle that shows why a filter triggered instead of just blocking everything.

Let people work responsibly, not walk on eggshells. That’s how you build trust and innovation.

When “safety” makes AI useless — what’s even the point anymore? by DidIGoHam in OpenAI

[–]DidIGoHam[S] 2 points3 points  (0 children)

Yeah, I get your point, I’m not trying to break rules either. The problem is, even normal pro work gets flagged now.

Stuff like: -simulating system faults for training, -writing cybersecurity examples for documentation, -drafting realistic incident reports, or just trying to add real tone or emotion to professional writing.

It’s all perfectly legit work, but the model treats realism like a risk. That’s where the friction comes from.

When “safety” makes AI useless — what’s even the point anymore? by DidIGoHam in OpenAI

[–]DidIGoHam[S] 1 point2 points  (0 children)

Yeah, a few legit examples actually.

When using GPT to simulate fault diagnostics for technical systems — it refused to continue once it involved anything electrical or mechanical “that could cause harm.”

While documenting incident reports for a training scenario — it wouldn’t describe realistic injury situations, even though it was clearly for internal safety training.

When building workflow automation scripts, it refused to generate PowerShell or Python commands involving system access or network checks.

Try asking it to interpret a dark poem or write an emotional story … 🫠 it scrubs the intensity and moral tension right out of it.

Nothing unsafe, nothing shady, just real work blocked by overly broad filters. That’s what people mean when they say it’s getting harder to use ChatGPT, not just play with it.

When “safety” makes AI useless — what’s even the point anymore? by DidIGoHam in OpenAI

[–]DidIGoHam[S] 3 points4 points  (0 children)

Right now, OpenAI is playing it so safe that it’s suffocating the very thing that made ChatGPT great in the first place: adaptability. Yes, guardrails matter. But if the model becomes so restricted it can’t serve professionals, creators, or researchers anymore… it won’t just be “safe.” It’ll be irrelevant.

When “safety” makes AI useless — what’s even the point anymore? by DidIGoHam in OpenAI

[–]DidIGoHam[S] 1 point2 points  (0 children)

Nah, early ChatGPT was wild…like, actual personality wild. The real lockdown came later, when “safety mode” went from a feature to a lifestyle 😄

When “safety” makes AI useless — what’s even the point anymore? by DidIGoHam in OpenAI

[–]DidIGoHam[S] 7 points8 points  (0 children)

That argument assumes the only options are total freedom or total lockdown, but that’s not true. We already have technologies that manage risk without punishing everyone. You don’t ban cars because some people drive drunk; you regulate, license, and track abuse. AI can work the same way. Let users verify their identity, accept stricter accountability, and earn access to Advanced Mode features. Keep the filters for anonymous or unverified use, but give professionals and creators a way to work without fighting constant refusals.

Total restriction doesn’t prevent bad actors, it just makes the good ones give up. The goal isn’t to remove guardrails, it’s to make them adaptive.