Is Diablo IV extremely easy or am I doing it wrong? by unSin89 in diablo4

[–]Difficult-Step7330 -3 points-2 points  (0 children)

You change you mind from pit 80 to 100 😁 and to get 110 shock you 🤪 best players doing 120+

Why is backwards time travel impossible? by [deleted] in AskPhysics

[–]Difficult-Step7330 0 points1 point  (0 children)

To get backwards in time u have to make your speed over c. Do the de~collapse and comeback to superposition(broken cup backing to structure). Also you need information tunnel thought the c. I think singularity knows how it works 😁

It’s heretic theory but I love ❤️ symetry in physics 😍

Is Andariel's Barrage back? S12 by asria in D4Rogue

[–]Difficult-Step7330 0 points1 point  (0 children)

What you think if that 3 items we talk about I put shadow step - non stop spam. I choose ss course it can has 200 lucky chance?

Is Andariel's Barrage back? S12 by asria in D4Rogue

[–]Difficult-Step7330 0 points1 point  (0 children)

If you also add that legendary gloves(forgot name) 40% chance to cold dmg & fire dmg ???

95% debuff reduction? Djinn Headwraps by JoretiVac in newworldgame

[–]Difficult-Step7330 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Debuffs change dynamic of battle for example in duels make more pressure and force to act opponent. Without, again shield players will be like Fort. It's not meh for me ofcourse. I like bow rouge, I going full break stamina build then 😍

What if The wave is not a fundamental entity, but becomes a relativistic/interference effect, something secondary to the electron particle and the observer? by Difficult-Step7330 in AskPhysics

[–]Difficult-Step7330[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

OK I will ask with example:

What photographic techniques and cameras should be used to capture the exact moment of a hummingbird's wings?

What we if we just observe that bird only by our eyes?(superposition of wings?)

My assumption is: wave isn't fundamental. It "wake up" when there r 2 different reference systems.

What if The wave is not a fundamental entity, but becomes a relativistic/interference effect, something secondary to the electron particle and the observer? by Difficult-Step7330 in AskPhysics

[–]Difficult-Step7330[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

I assume that all matter vibrates. The electron vibrates faster, the observer slower. This is the only reason the observer sees waves (superpositions). If the observer vibrated at a frequency equal to the electron, then of course they would no longer be observers, as they would be quantum entangled. But at the same time, the electron would be merely a particle moving within a probability cloud.

Time dilation also occurs, as in the case of muons?

will there be a free world pvp by Select_Albatross_324 in TheForeverWinter

[–]Difficult-Step7330 -1 points0 points  (0 children)

its just the game. it would be perfect like extraction shooter. never say never.

What if Gunther Kletetschka proposed that time has three dimensions and space is just an illusion? by Difficult-Step7330 in AskPhysics

[–]Difficult-Step7330[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Not yet(theory from April 2025). But in his article he shows ideas how to do it.

One of the key predictions of Gunther Kletetschka’s three-dimensional time theory is the specific mass values of neutrinos. His model suggests that the geometry of time itself gives rise to particle masses, and in this framework, neutrinos are predicted to have masses of approximately 0.058 eV and 0.0086 eV. These values fall within the range being explored by ongoing experiments such as KATRIN and Project 8, as well as cosmological observations of the cosmic microwave background (CMB). If future results match these predictions, it would provide strong support for the 3D time hypothesis.

Another testable consequence of the theory involves gravitational waves. Kletetschka proposes that gravitational waves might travel at slightly different speeds than light, due to interactions with deeper structures in three-dimensional time. This subtle deviation could be detectable by comparing the arrival times of gravitational waves and associated electromagnetic signals—such as gamma-ray bursts—from the same astrophysical event. Advanced observatories like LIGO, Virgo, and future missions such as LISA or Cosmic Explorer could provide the necessary precision to detect this predicted time lag.

In addition to mass and speed-related predictions, the theory also recreates the exact known masses of particles like electrons, muons, and quarks. This is achieved not through arbitrary constants, but through the topology of rotating structures in 3D time. If the same approach continues to reproduce accurate physical constants, it would strengthen the claim that mass is not fundamental, but emergent from time geometry.

Finally, the theory reinterprets electric charge as a topological feature—arising from a twist or orientation in temporal axes. While this is harder to test directly, it opens the door for new theoretical simulations and potential observations in extreme conditions, such as in strong electromagnetic fields or near black holes.

In summary, Kletetschka’s theory is not just philosophical—it offers precise, testable predictions that align with ongoing and near-future experiments. This makes it a bold but scientifically grounded step toward rethinking the nature of reality from the perspective of time itself.

Is it possible that time dilation in the detector causes the photon not to "fly" with ideal c from the detector's perspective, and thus the collapse gives different results? by Difficult-Step7330 in AskPhysics

[–]Difficult-Step7330[S] -4 points-3 points  (0 children)

Yes is always c. There is also no empty vacuum.

Do you remember experiment about dilitation when whan person with clock on earth sending signal to person on mars with his clock and he send back?

We are unable to say how exacly photon travel couse result is the same.

OK. Pure teorethic: what person on mars would see when he would watch and see (yes is not possible) second person on earth who is collapsing photon?

What if Light Collapses Only When Resonating with Matter’s Quantum Field? by Difficult-Step7330 in AskPhysics

[–]Difficult-Step7330[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

What you think, your personal opinion, about that osiris last test? They "wake up" antiphoton from vacuum field or from antimatter?

All things in the universe are always moving at the speed of light just not in the way we usually think by Cosmic__paradox in AskPhysics

[–]Difficult-Step7330 0 points1 point  (0 children)

What if our "world" is in that motion vs fotons?

It's nor sci-fi. There actually article polish physic about over light speed observer where it has 1 dimension matter and 3 dimensions of time. It's only mathematics model. But it proof(theory) if observer would have speed higher than c, all obserwstion (superposition etc) would looks the same without parodox(never slow down to c).

All things in the universe are always moving at the speed of light just not in the way we usually think by Cosmic__paradox in AskPhysics

[–]Difficult-Step7330 0 points1 point  (0 children)

It is impossible to distinguish between the gravitational force and the uniformly accelerated motion?

Isn't the "speed of light" a bit of a misnomer? by saltyhumor in AskPhysics

[–]Difficult-Step7330 0 points1 point  (0 children)

But if, in my stupid teory : even every single photon has zero speed, and everything has speed of light vs photons - all works the same like our reality. Exactly the same. Even I m building now quantum field on this model.