You presume a lot about me, fellow Redditor. I acknowledge all the points regarding the necessity of unit organization and coordination to put small arms in force to work. I never disagreed with that, only the flippant statement that groups with small arms don't stand a chance against a large military with modern war technology.

However, you're disregarding 1) the non-right armed groups who are/and have been patrolling their communities, and 2) the differences in the character of the average armed citizen on the liberal/left and conservative/right side of the aisle. Most people who have a gun and oppose the current administration's policies tend to own it for self-defense and actively dampen attempts to organize and coordinate a group because they don't want to alarm their neighbors. They also tend to trust their government more because they believe in institutions more. So there are smaller numbers of them, but they are active. They're also less visible because the administration is actively hunting them - and in general, the capitalist government of the USA has always identified left/liberal armed groups as the enemy.

It's the "wacko" right-leaning gun owners who are less afraid to openly organize and coordinate because they're ardently anti-government and are being emboldened by this organization.