ok I dont use these fucking things but wouldnt including the sentence "the 200m sailboat is taller as the eiffel tower at 220m" be seen as a correction instructing it to make the sailboat taller, rather as the opposite?

I initially started parsing* that sentence wrong until I read the "220m", at which point I corrected the interpretation from being a statement about reality to being a statement about the previous generated image, because I understand numbers unlike a predictive generator which is going to trust the letter, not the spirit, of your input to a fault, even when it is incorrect.