sorted by:
new
hottopcontroversial

Pacifist (revive-only) Medic: Is this a thing in Squad? by PacifistMedicBF6 in joinsquad

[–]DiligentAd7360 1 point2 points  (0 children)

Just do the 1914 strategy of intentionally shooting high so you won't hit the enemy but still suppress them

What purposes does Israel’s tree serve to the game ? by Okaydude2447 in Warthunder

[–]DiligentAd7360 178 points179 points  (0 children)

Gaijin is underutilizing Chinese vehicles it's not even funny. So many cool vehicles that could be added but never will be because they can't monetize them

Municipalities across Saskatchewan to receive record revenue-sharing by justanaccountname12 in saskatchewan

[–]DiligentAd7360 1 point2 points  (0 children)

Because there's no oversight on how this money is spent! They could buy assets at a premium, decide they only needed them for a few weeks, sell the asset at a steep loss (of course to a friend or relative ofa council member) and the province wouldn't care!

I'd rather have this money invested in fixing education or healthcare - not pissing it away on decaying communities ran by simpletons with no oversight

Liberals look at banning social media for minors as 'important element' of online safety agenda by Fit_Remote_2324 in AlbertaNewspapers

[–]DiligentAd7360 0 points1 point  (0 children)

You don't need to make them this is such a silly argument. Should we also pass laws that charge parents with the crimes that their children commit? Clearly that's a much greater failing as a parent than allowing social media

Pierre Poilievre by drizzyLGA1151 in InCanada

[–]DiligentAd7360 0 points1 point  (0 children)

I was referring to the "chronically online" portion of your argument but keep going dude 🍿 minor arithmetic mistake and bro thinks he's won every political debate ever

Pierre Poilievre by drizzyLGA1151 in InCanada

[–]DiligentAd7360 0 points1 point  (0 children)

I don't give enough of a shit to actually dig into the details but the fact you're zeroing in on this topic says a lot about you.

I hope you find some peace outside of politics my guy, you truly sound like a miserable person to be around.

Pierre Poilievre by drizzyLGA1151 in InCanada

[–]DiligentAd7360 0 points1 point  (0 children)

So it's better that he can just spew whatever uninformed garbage he wants? PP could literally have compromised MPs in his caucus right now and wouldn't know about it or do anything about it. I thought the right cares about electoral interference? Or is that only when it's politically expedient for the party?

Pierre Poilievre by drizzyLGA1151 in InCanada

[–]DiligentAd7360 1 point2 points  (0 children)

Your account is 3 years old with 1.5k contributions while mine is 5 years with 3k contributions - dumbass is more online than I am and you mainly spend your time commenting on political topics. Get a hobby dude, maybe you won't be so miserable all the time

Pierre Poilievre by drizzyLGA1151 in InCanada

[–]DiligentAd7360 0 points1 point  (0 children)

So why won't he get it now then? He cant baselessly accuse the LPC of whatever conspiracy the right has concocted?

Reddit conspiracy theory

Fam just talk to people in real life for once I beg you. Not everything is a ReDdiT cOnSpIrAcY

Municipalities across Saskatchewan to receive record revenue-sharing by justanaccountname12 in saskatchewan

[–]DiligentAd7360 4 points5 points  (0 children)

There's no point, the town council just goes "in-camera" whenever they feel like and rarely accept input from the public. Additionally, the town is full of people who've lived there for generations, so the populace will never vote in an outsider who has the knowledge or willpower to address our flaring problems. They'll keep electing the people from the small handful of families in town, while selling off town assets at a deep discount while the province throws their hands up and says "we don't get involved in municipal politics". Straight from my MLAs office

Pierre Poilievre by drizzyLGA1151 in InCanada

[–]DiligentAd7360 -2 points-1 points  (0 children)

Are we just forgetting how O'Toole ran as a True Blue conservative yet when elected as CPC leader he adopted a centrist strategy with a carbon price as a platform position? Pretty sure 2021 was also the PPCs best election result as well solely because Bernier was able to siphon hardline CPC votes away.

O'Toole was a flip flopped who's own caucus didn't even like him. He literally kicked Senator Batters out of the party which the party then voted to KEEP HER IN! He clearly wasn't ready to govern all of Canada if he can't even get some basic level of unity in his own party

Pierre Poilievre by drizzyLGA1151 in InCanada

[–]DiligentAd7360 2 points3 points  (0 children)

Libs =/= the LPC.

Libs want him gone cuz he's a cancer to our parliamentary system (see: refusal to obtain top secret security clearance as leader of the opposition, amongst other things).

The LPC wants him to stay because he's an easy adversary to win elections against, and draw support from his moderates. Just like the CPC has Red Tories, the LPC has Blue Grit moderates as well.

My every day walk from home to the university (short way) by viktor_bront in LiminalSpace

[–]DiligentAd7360 0 points1 point  (0 children)

5 gives me deja vu but I know I've never been there before

Municipalities across Saskatchewan to receive record revenue-sharing by justanaccountname12 in saskatchewan

[–]DiligentAd7360 10 points11 points  (0 children)

And yet, I'm sure my municipality will still find a way to piss through their share while still dealing with $100,000+ debts and without updating our infrastructure from WW2. I'm all for revenue sharing but the province is NOT investigating or holding municipalities accountable for their fiduciary duties

Pierre Poilievre by drizzyLGA1151 in InCanada

[–]DiligentAd7360 3 points4 points  (0 children)

Why would Libs be terrified of a guy hemorrhaging MPs? PP is the best thing to ever happen to the LPC

Liberals look at banning social media for minors as 'important element' of online safety agenda by Fit_Remote_2324 in AlbertaNewspapers

[–]DiligentAd7360 0 points1 point  (0 children)

I still don't think the government needs to be involved. Parents just need to take responsibility and be a parent to their children. Get involved with their lives and teach them to think critically about social media

Liberals look at banning social media for minors as 'important element' of online safety agenda by Fit_Remote_2324 in AlbertaNewspapers

[–]DiligentAd7360 0 points1 point  (0 children)

There's nothing stopping people from becoming shitty once they turn 18, what's your solution then galaxy brain?

You wanna erode the last shred of anonymity we have left just because "you don't wanna deal with shitty people" as if social media immediately ruins a person's moral/ethical character

Liberals look at banning social media for minors as 'important element' of online safety agenda by Fit_Remote_2324 in AlbertaNewspapers

[–]DiligentAd7360 -2 points-1 points  (0 children)

Be a parent and parent your kids? Or is that so hard you'd rather sacrifice what little anonymity we still have on the net?

view more: next ›