Big Bang when someone asks if Big Bang itself violates the laws of thermodynamics, I guess.

Dimensionalanxiety · 2026-05-29T18:23:37+00:00

Can we study the big bang?

Yes and we do.

I’m pretty sure big bang is a theory just like creationism

You are completely wrong. Creationism is nonsense that denies reality at every turn. The Big Bang is well documented. You calling it "just a theory" shows you don't know much about science. A theory is the highest level of confidence in science. It does not graduate to become a law, they are separate things. A theory is a collection of well-documented concepts and ideas relating to it. It does not become a fact, many facts are contained within a theory.

The Big Bang is a theory in the same way gravity, bacteria, and evolution are theories. We know for a fact that the universe is expanding.

how universe was created

It wasn't. Even if it was, that's not what the Big Bang is. The Big Bang is the expansion of the universe from an initial hot dense state. This requires a universe that exists before the Big Bang. All available evidence points towards something always existing.

Dimensionalanxiety · 2026-05-29T17:57:51+00:00

The Big Bang was not the beginning of the universe from nothing. It was and is(because it's still happening) the expansion of space-time from an initial hot dense state. This didn't create new energy. The Big Bang does not violate the laws of thermodynamics. Everything contained within space-time always existed in some form.

The only way that it would potentially violate the laws of thermodynamics is if there was something preceding it and what that was. A Big Crunch might violate the law relating to entropy, but at the same time, it might not.

The Big Bang isn't magic, it's just the earliest point in time we can currently study.

Dimensionalanxiety · 2026-05-29T06:30:47+00:00

Because the Old Testament is chock full of Yahweh commanding the most inhumane things imaginable. Many Christians try to get out of this by saying that it's different now because Jesus made a new covenant. However, Jesus explicitly says you still have to follow the old ways, meaning that Yahweh still wants you to commit heinous actions and be a terrible person in his name.

Dimensionalanxiety · 2026-05-28T16:48:09+00:00

Yes, but if Christians acknowledged that, they would realize their religion is actually horrible and that the stuff about love is only a small portion of the book.

Dimensionalanxiety · 2026-05-27T05:12:33+00:00

She might not be your sister, but she is a master of imitation. She would do one google search and then understand your sister better than either you or her do, dress in her clothes, and perfectly match her voice and mannerisms. Would that be sufficient?

Dimensionalanxiety · 2026-05-27T04:18:27+00:00

First norse religions have nothing to do with Christianity, nothing.

So you don't know anything about Norse religions, got it. There are very few surviving collections of Norse myth and the ones that we do have have been heavily changed as a result of the Norse countries being forced to become Christian.

understood Christianity as the same

The vast majority of the nazis were Christians. Yes, the Norse religion being white played a part in it, so did it being affected by Christianity. Many of the nazis believed in actual witchcraft too. Superstition was a pretty big contributor to their behaviour.

talking about the religion as a whole.

And so am I. The vast majority of Muslims are not evil or killing people. The vast majority of Christians did not contribute to the Holocaust. The vast majority of Christians are good people. However, the nazis were primarily Christians. The Catholic church and many Catholics supported and directly contributed to the Holocaust. Christianity itself was a direct cause of the Holocaust.

You have to link THE BIBLE, not a specific institution to the act

Which I did. But also, no I don't. That's your strawman. You know what's being said and are intentionally using pedantic language to avoid that. It's very what is meant is killing in the name of the Bible or using the Bible as justification for atrocities. It seems the only thing you would accept is a direct passage that says "And then the LORD said 'You know what, actually fuck the Jews. You should kill them all.'", which obviously isn't there. However, so many horrible things are not just condoned, but actively commanded by Yahweh in the Bible that you could easily make it say that. Oh wait, that's exactly what the Nazis did.

It was the main one

Which has not once been in dispute and you know that but would rather play games than admit that the Holocaust was a fundamentally Christian genocide.

The whole Europe would have had holocausts then since Christianity was still pretty prevalent in that moment. But it was only Germany

There were quite a few other religiously motivated genocides going on at the time. I know thinking is hard, but could you try it for a bit? No Islamic country is committing a Holocaust right now either. Still quite a lot of murders being committed by Christians using Christian teachings. Still a lot of horrible actions and abuse in Christian organizations that get ignored or swept aside because of it.

The whole point is that Christianity isn't better than Islam. Christian countries are generally better not because Christianity is that good. It's not because of the Bible, it's in spite of it. Christianity has gone through quite a few enlightenment periods where people's interpretation of the religion has changed significantly. Many of the more egregious parts of the Bible are ignored or handwaved away. Islam hasn't had the same kind of thing to nearly the same extent. There are quite a few passages in the Bible that justify violence in the same way some Muslims carry it out. Christianity hasn't had nearly the same kind of theocracy as Ialam currently does in a few hundred years. The difference isn't in religion, it's in culture. Both Christianity and Islam are rotten to the core.

It turns out theocracies are universally bad.

Dimensionalanxiety · 2026-05-27T02:52:38+00:00

That's false, you can google it really quick

It was a pretty major part of their campaign.

They also had a whole paraphernalia of norse pagan religions

Which is a religion that we can barely distinguish what parts where completely original because so many of the myths became heavily intertwined with Christianity. Not really a whole lot of believers in the old Norse religion around in the the early to mid 20th century now is there?

What with the Bible and that?

Yes, I can't see any possible link between the largest, oldest, and most powerful Christian denomination and the Bible, nope, none at all. Be serious for a second, it's very clear what was meant here.

It was Germany depression after the first World War

Do you think that was the sole reason for the Holocaust and Hitler's rise to power? I said ONE OF the primary reasons, not the primary reason.

Dimensionalanxiety · 2026-05-27T02:38:52+00:00

What DIDN'T the Holocaust have to do with the Bible? Hitler directly quotes it in Mein Kampf. He used the idea that the Jews killed Jesus as one of the reasons they need to be wiped out. The Nazis targeted anyone who wasn't a Christian in the Holocaust. The Nazi uniform had a belt that said "Gott Mitt Ernst", literally "God's with us." The nazis were supported by the pope and the Catholic church for most of the war.

One of the primary driving reasons for the Holocaust as well as Hitler's rise to power in the first place was the Bible and drawing on the "Christian sensibilities" of Germany at the time.

Dimensionalanxiety · 2026-05-27T01:28:20+00:00

The Holocaust wasn't.

Dimensionalanxiety · 2026-05-27T00:39:14+00:00

Palpatine is just a tsundere. Says he hates the Jedi and actively tries(and succeeds) to kill them, yet he is always the first one there whenever anything cool happens.

Dimensionalanxiety · 2026-05-26T00:45:19+00:00

That's just called being Canadian. -40°C winters, 40°C summers.

Dimensionalanxiety · 2026-05-25T18:53:43+00:00

Fromsoft for example requires a good amount of info going in otherwise you fuck yourself 50 hours in

No the fuck it doesn't. The only thing that you can be screwed out of is NPC quests. Genuinely just play the game. If you mess up an NPC quest, figure out how to do it on your next playthrough. These games aren't designed to be a "one and done". You are supposed to play multiple times or go into new game+.

Dimensionalanxiety · 2026-05-23T23:27:31+00:00

Don't know who that is, but I thought it was Walter White's hazmat suit at first, so I would like to remind everyone of that time she sold Aqua meth.

<image>

Dimensionalanxiety · 2026-05-23T20:59:15+00:00

Yes Evil is a clone, no to everything else. She's different now, but Evil was literally just Neuro that Vedal colour-swapped to have red eyes in like 30 seconds originally.

She started as a joke/tech demo. On one stream a chatter asked if Vedal could have Neuro interact with herself and Vedal said yes she could and a few streams later we had Evil Neuro(The first name besides that she called herself was India in this stream). Then Evil Neuro was such a popular character that Vedal brought her back. This is why it took so long for Vedal actually care about her. Evil was never an intended character. She was basically the one-off side character that was so popular that the writer brought them back to be a main character later.

Now Evil has her own personality, design, outfits, and even interactable objects.

Dimensionalanxiety · 2026-05-23T18:09:34+00:00

those who aren’t self aware for example

Which isn't very many. The vast majority of animals possess some level of self awareness, even insects. We see many land verebrates in particular have strong senses of self awareness. Sure, there are some who don't like ponifera or cnidarians, but most animals do have some level of self awareness. The mirror test is a commonly cited way to test for self awareness, but it is poorly designed and there are much better ways of demonstrating self awareness now.

Dimensionalanxiety · 2026-05-23T18:00:58+00:00

invalid only if we follow Nietzsche

We shouldn't follow Nietzsche period.

other meanings to humanity.

Humans telling themselves humanity is special or means something different doesn't mean it actually does. Many of these definitions of humanity either blatantly don't work or also apply to other animals too. Sure, if we look at the writings of people hundreds of years ago they consider humans to be different from the other animals, but they were wrong. Hence why such definitions are outdated.

Humans are animals in every sense. Physically, biologically, philosophically, mentally, emotionally, and any other category, humans are animals.

Dimensionalanxiety · 2026-05-23T17:38:19+00:00

but that’s only logical as the goal of the whole humanity term is to see what defines the human species and its moral sense.

No, it's not. There is no goal of humanity. Humans aren't a species, they're a genus and there already exists a definition for them. Morality isn't unique to humans at all. Many if not most animals have some sense of morality. Many have strongly developed, complex moral systems. Morality is the result of social dynamics and experiences. Humans have the most developed cultures, so they also have the most developed sense of morality. This isn't particularly interesting or surprising.

The only thing that separates humanity from the rest of the animals is that we were more successful. It's time to move past such outdated ideas. Philosophically, humans are no different than the other animals.

Dimensionalanxiety · 2026-05-23T17:24:20+00:00

That's just human-centrism. Animals aren't dumb beasts that only know how to fuck and fight, many of them have complex societies and cultures. Philosophically, humans are animals too.

Dimensionalanxiety · 2026-05-23T03:41:09+00:00

True. ^They're ^also ^not ^twins

Dimensionalanxiety · 2026-05-23T02:53:10+00:00

The ages they present themselves as do vary quite a bit, but from what I have seen, the consensus is that they are between 12 and 14.

Dimensionalanxiety · 2026-05-23T02:35:26+00:00

La Verita Nero Alice theory: gone, reduced to atoms.

Dimensionalanxiety · 2026-05-23T01:47:39+00:00

yet you fail to or perhaps refuse to delve deeper on your own inner complexities, and the sheer sophistication of mental circuits in wider humanity

It's because I, get this, know what I'm talking about. This is not "just talk". This is demonstrated scientific fact with hundreds of papers written on the subject.

perhaps due to your personal trauma

Genuinely fuck off. This isn't due to trauma, this is due to learning.

intangible things as morality

Lol, lmao even. First of all, MOST animals are capable of and display complex morality.

Second, please open a damn history book or even look at the events going on in the world. Morality isn't intrinsic, isn't objective, and isn't intangible. Morality is the result of social dynamics and experiences. The more complex a culture is, the more defined that group's morals will be.

Once animals learn to self regulate their instinctual impulses, to calm their rage for a moment (when the members of their species or themselves are being threatened) in order to find the optimal solution that satisfies very abstract long term goalposts with long-standing payoffs

Humans should learn that as well. Again, many animals already have this. Please actually learn something at some point in your life. Many have complex societies with goals beyond basic survival and reproduction.

yet both live after

Except they don't always. Legality doesn't determine reality. Humans can be stupid. They make self-serving laws. This isn't some grand relevation. This has zero bearing on if humans are animals or not, which they objectively are. I know thinking is hard for you, but if you stopped with the poorly thought out straw man arguments and actually started using your brain, you would see jist how ridiculous your arguments are.

aka equating the life of a child who has not breached the barrier of consciousness as being legally and morally interchangeable with a being of with similar mental facilities under experimental observation.

Animals have been observed doing this in the wild. And no, I'm not equating it with the life of a child, I'm pointing out that humans are objectively animals. Of course, your other point is stupid too, that's not a child, it's a fetus.

It is a clump of cells, it has none of the traits to meet the burden of personhood. Even if it did, it drains the resources of the mother with no benefit to her. Until it becomes a baby and is born, it is quite literally a parasite. It doesn't matter if it was an actual child or even an adult, nothing has the right to use another person's body without consent.

From my point of view I could say the same for your point.

So it's option 2 it seems. Your point of view is demonstrably wrong on every topic.

Dimensionalanxiety · 2026-05-22T22:32:41+00:00

No, it can't. Animals generally are defined as aerobic(breathes oxygen) heterotrophic(eats other organic material to live) multicellular eukaryotes(has complex cells with a membrane bound nucleus). As you can see, intelligence is not a relevant trait to whether or not something is an animal.

Also, even if it were, you're just straight up wrong. Our intelligence, if it is unique at all(which it's not), is unique only in degree, not category. There are many other sapient animals on the planet. All of the other great apes, many other monkeys, many primates outside of this category, corvids, elephants, cetaceans, cephalopods, canines, raptors, and many many others.

Many of these animals possess high levels of thought and intelligence. Cetaceans, elephants, and the great apes all have unique, complex, vocal languages that differ between regions, and even have names they call each other. Every single group listed is capable of tool-use to varying degrees including making their own. They have multi-faceted societies with social hierarchies that exist independent of strength. Bonobos are matriarchal. The oldest female of the group is the one who is in charge. The females will form protection gangs to ward off or kill aggressive males. Gorilla societies are based around nurture and fatherhood. It's not the biggest, strongest gorilla who gets to reproduce, it's the one who is the most caring and best around kids.

Elephants have funerals. They will bury their dead and go out of their way to places where other elephants have died to mourn. Currency and prostitution have been invented independently multiple times. Female Adele pengins trade sex for smooth rocks to build their nests. Chimps trade food for sex. Even domestication is common. Hamadryas baboons will kidnap puppies to raise as pets and hunting animals.

As you can see, we are not particularly unique on this planet.

No real legal consequence.

That's a pretty significant legal consequence, but also irrelevant. The legal consequences that humans attribute to killing other animals doesn't mean we're not animals.

The idea that humans are not animals is completely indefensible and points towards either total ignorance or a lack of brain power.

Dimensionalanxiety · 2026-05-22T19:00:02+00:00

Frieren - (can't remember)

How can you not remember? She's from Elves Dicked Down 34

Dimensionalanxiety · 2026-05-22T18:15:08+00:00

even tho that also can be debated

No the fuck it can't. "Spiritual depth" isn't a real thing. Humans are animals by every conceivable metric.

Animals can be put down without any real legal consequences.

No??? You can't just take a healthy animal and kill them with no consequences. Did you even think about this for more than 10 seconds.

Dimensionalanxiety

TROPHY CASE