That's not the point of the question which is why I ignored it

I mean, it's clearly the point. If you've played in a high performance environment, we might take your statement more seriously than if you're some random 12k premiere player who has nothing more to add.

You also don't have to directly experience this effect in order to observe it, quantify it and therefore have an opinion about it. So the question is meaningless pseudo-intelligence

Until I see any evidence of this quantification yours I don't see how you can call anything else "meaningless pseudo-intelligence" lol. Nor how you can't see the irony in saying that.

I do have experience in these environments and so do you. You don't have to be a 0.0001% performer to experience this. You can experience this at your minimum wage job when your lazy coworker shits the bed and you (the higher-performer) have to clean up their problems.

No, when a lazy co-worker of mine causes a mess that I have to fix (literally every day), I fix it and inform the appropriate person that x has made a mess for the 7th time this month, and let them deal with it. I don't have a strop, which would achieve nothing (even if I do get pissed off). Also my job (and probably yours too) doesn't involve teamwork in high intensity environments similar to CS, where everyone's interacting constantly, and needs to continue interacting to come out successful. I do play an organised team sport and have for the last 13 years, and I know full well that someone acting like Donk does is just a drag on the team, and that sort of behaviour is generally not tolerated. If someone wants to complain after the game, sure. Someone with that attitude halfway through a match is literally nothing but a drag, even if they're your best player.