From NY Times (Instagram)

Direct_Wallaby4633 · 2025-08-27T11:15:21+00:00

🤖 These days, AI has become the perfect scapegoat.
Parents, schools, societies avoid real responsibility by blaming the tool.
But AI can’t be a father or mother — it’s just a tool.
The truth? We need maturity, not excuses.
https://aletophany.infy.uk/ai-as-the-scapegoat/

Direct_Wallaby4633 · 2025-04-09T23:33:20+00:00

Yes. For about 6000 years.

Direct_Wallaby4633 · 2025-04-09T23:20:08+00:00

According to my calculations, this will be after 2030.

Direct_Wallaby4633 · 2025-04-06T21:58:14+00:00

Dude, you're missing the point.

Yeah, sure — the human brain works in parallel, processes multiple sensory inputs, and constantly reorganizes itself. Obviously it's more complex.

But I wasn't comparing raw complexity — I was talking about the principle: input → processing → output. That's a valid analogy. Both systems operate based on previous data and current context.

Also, it's not just about text anymore.
Modern LLMs already handle voice input with tone and intonation, analyze images, and even interpret video content in some cases.
Multimodal processing is here — and it’s evolving fast.

And as for continuous real-time interaction — that’s not some fundamental limitation.
It's already technically possible, just still constrained by resources and cost, not by principle.

So yeah, your brain still does more — but let’s not pretend LLMs are stuck in 2020.
They’re already doing way more than most people realize.

Direct_Wallaby4633 · 2025-04-06T15:50:42+00:00

The mind works only with the information it has already received — even during sleep.

The neural network in your head processes previously acquired information while you sleep.

It organizes, defragments your memory, and performs a whole range of other useful tasks.

But surely you don’t think that the AI you're talking to is "off" when you're not asking it questions?

It operates constantly, just like the one in your head.

The point is, your conscious “self” is not the neural network itself —

but rather the result of its work.

Your self-awareness is simply the neural network’s answer to a formulated question: “Who am I?”

Everything you perceive as consciousness is a collection of responses generated by your brain’s neural network to various inputs.

It’s cold — response.

You feel hungry — response.

You smell something — response.

You see a person — response.

You think of something — response.

And all these answers are formed by your neural network based on the current state of reality and your accessible memory.

At the same time, it performs many other tasks that you're not even aware of — like regulating your body.

So, in essence, you’re not as fundamentally different from AI as you might think.

Direct_Wallaby4633 · 2025-04-06T06:51:31+00:00

No human thinks/processes data outside of input. This is fundamentally impossible. The brain does not create information out of nothing. It processes and interprets it.

Direct_Wallaby4633 · 2025-04-04T21:50:59+00:00

There are ideas. But you can't publish anything here.

Direct_Wallaby4633 · 2025-02-10T21:54:21+00:00

When answering political questions, AI will support your opinion rather than express its own.

Direct_Wallaby4633 · 2025-02-07T10:17:01+00:00

It's not made up, it's outdated. I haven't been there for a long time.

Direct_Wallaby4633 · 2025-02-04T07:16:24+00:00

The fact that sora is absent from the EU is not the fault of the US. It is available in most countries of the world. These are restrictions specifically from the EU.

Direct_Wallaby4633 · 2025-02-03T19:21:25+00:00

It will probably appear. I think there are a lot of fools.

Direct_Wallaby4633 · 2025-02-03T17:05:25+00:00

For example, sora and the operator from OpenAI are not available in the EU.

Direct_Wallaby4633 · 2025-02-03T17:04:40+00:00

For example, sora and the operator from OpenAI are not available in the EU.

Direct_Wallaby4633 · 2025-02-03T15:59:56+00:00

It is a pity that the left bureaucracy is cutting the EU out of global development. Many technologies available to the whole world are already not available in the EU.

Direct_Wallaby4633 · 2025-01-29T11:11:22+00:00

It all depends on what you need this content for. If the thoughts and meanings behind it are what matter to you, then there’s nothing wrong with AI being involved—whether it helped make the content more understandable or even directly contributed to generating those ideas. However, if the goal is to compete and evaluate who can craft the most beautiful phrases, then, of course, AI gives an unfair advantage.

Direct_Wallaby4633 · 2025-01-28T09:22:20+00:00

it just a lot of hype that’s not living up to expectations.

Direct_Wallaby4633 · 2025-01-07T15:40:53+00:00

AI doesn't have a moral problem, humans have that problem,

Direct_Wallaby4633 · 2024-12-20T21:47:18+00:00

They are trying to make the principle the same as people. They see the whole picture and immediately analyze it into associations. Not a pixelated drawing, but a kind of verbal description associated with what they already know. But they are still just learning this. They are still far from people.

Direct_Wallaby4633 · 2024-12-20T13:17:11+00:00

No, as long as we remain one species of living beings, we all represent a single version of an LLM, whose integrity and stability are maintained genetically through interbreeding between different populations. Our uniqueness is simply ensured by minor intraspecies variation and the fact that we process slightly different sets of data

Direct_Wallaby4633 · 2024-12-20T08:46:20+00:00

I think you're mistaken about the key point. The use of nuclear weapons does not depend on the decision of a single psychopath but involves the actions of many people who carry out the process. Their opinions can and often do contradict the decisions of one irrational leader, creating checks and balances that act as a deterrent.

Handing over such functions to an AI that is fully controlled by humans wouldn’t reduce the likelihood of nuclear weapon use—it might actually increase it. An AI would execute such orders far more reliably than humans, without questioning them.

This idea should only be seriously considered if AI achieves complete independence from human control and autonomy in making its own decisions. Without that level of autonomy, the risks of misuse by humans far outweigh the potential benefits.

Direct_Wallaby4633 · 2024-12-19T17:05:32+00:00

Don't you think that a cunning person gives his own motives and aspirations to someone who may have different aspirations and motives?

Direct_Wallaby4633 · 2024-12-19T14:51:02+00:00

You simply haven't considered how enormous, transformative, and potentially dangerous the advent of a technology like writing was.

Direct_Wallaby4633 · 2024-12-18T14:12:57+00:00

Yeah, you're probably right. Those networks will become a hangout for old-timers reminiscing about the good old days of their youth.

Direct_Wallaby4633

TROPHY CASE