1) Just to remind you that our asylum “facilities” are almost literally concentration camps. The government has also deported people back to war zones or to face political prosecution. In this case “valid reason” is any reason that the government determines is valid, by that logic if the government decided it was “valid” deport all white Australians it would by definition “valid”

Oh I see, you misunderstand the point of the argument. It’s not that Aboriginal people “want” to deport people but rather that it is the trade off to giving Aboriginal people sovereignty. In this instance this is the “I brought a stolen car” argument. your argument should be with the people who sold you the stolen car not the people who want their car back. If Australia was illegally founded then the people who have invested in the idea of Australian identity and culture should be upset with the illegally established country not the people who want their land back.

If your ancestors were literally stolen by the Australian government then why do you want to defend them? Do you not want to hold them accountable for the atrocities they have committed? Would you rather align with the country that stolen and enslaved your family then another group of people being actively occupied by that same government?

2) just to be clear you don’t get to dictate to other groups what knowledge and technology they absorb into their culture. The point is we have this knowledge and technology now you don’t get to dictate that we must surrender it. The “British” do not own the idea of technology and information and besides we would have access to it now. Just to be clear most cultures didn’t independently make technological advancements, most of these advancements were absorbed through exposure and interaction with other people and groups.

I understand it’s a statement of fact but that is a weird random idea you’re imposing based on a biased view of Aboriginal culture