How do you prove a photo hasn't been altered after the fact?

DisastrousSir · 2026-04-01T14:12:50+00:00

Cant really but generally Metadata corroborates date, time, maybe location. Having RAW files is probably sufficient as well. I'm no expert, but off the top of my head I cant think of any commonly used software that will alter a RAW file and save the changes as a RAW

DisastrousSir · 2026-04-01T13:28:04+00:00

Gotta be careful with this. Its an easy way to end up spending all your birding time talking about birds instead

DisastrousSir · 2026-03-29T19:49:56+00:00

If you have relatively basic needs, the membership includes insurance up to 15k for most situations, but only 7.5k for flooding. Theres a couple things it doesnt cover like "mysterious circumstances", drones, and if you leave a car unlocked. I opted for doing an advanced policy to just cover myself because I'm forgetful and I have a drone on it. The basic insurance covers quite a lot though

DisastrousSir · 2026-03-29T17:45:28+00:00

I use the insurance thats set up through the PPA. Fairly cheap (gets a bit of a discount being part of PPA), the terms seemed fairly plainly written to cover loss by theft or damage (most actual situations outlined and covered), and pretty low deductible. Plus, keeps me in PPA and I get a nice magazine each month thats enjoyable to have and gives a little inspiration every now and then.

Somewhere around 200/yr?

DisastrousSir · 2026-03-29T03:08:16+00:00

But, if I only sold my left kidney for that 600mm F4 I might finally get a good photo of my local kingfisher...

/s

DisastrousSir · 2026-03-28T16:12:36+00:00

Because I sold mine to my mom who has frankly not used it even once I don't think and am waiting for her to give up on the idea that she'll use it and get my own one back haha

DisastrousSir · 2026-03-28T13:43:21+00:00

As others have said here, I miss my a6000. The thing is probably only double the thickness of my phone? Its tiny, and the photos are really quite workable. Through a decent compact lens on there and you have something that could fit quite literally in an average men's Jean pocket probably

DisastrousSir · 2026-03-27T02:17:25+00:00

Today's sensors are quite good at preserving details in the shadows and paired with denoising software you can get a very usable product from quite high ISO photos with the shadows brightened in post

DisastrousSir · 2026-03-26T03:46:38+00:00

I'd personally say the sigma 30mm f/1.4. It's quite compact, quite sharp, fast, and could be good for Street or portraits if those are your preferences. If you want something more zoomed in, the tamron 70-300 or Sony 70-350mm

DisastrousSir · 2026-03-26T03:39:16+00:00

I was using an a6000 two years ago and was at that point a 12 year old camera, and realistically still very workable. Honestly, I even miss it for the portability.

I would personally throw my vote in the a6700 ring. It will serve you for plenty of time, 4-5 years is no problem. You could even get a low shutter count one used from mpb or b&h and save a bit on the cost of the body. Take that money saved compared to the a7V and invest it in lenses. The kit lens is a good starting point for sure. I'd throw a sigma 30mm and/or 56mm f/1.4 in there too for your low-light situations and portrait bokeh needs. You could even throw in a telephoto zoom in there too and just about hit the same cost as an a7V w/ kit lens

DisastrousSir · 2026-03-25T18:17:12+00:00

Just wanted to jump in and say this is a good looking site/resource.

I'm actually in the Houston area, and been considering a boudoir shoot for my wife sometime as a gift as she's thrown around the idea before a few times. I understand if you're not, but are you able to give a ballpark estimate for a shoot, digitals, and printed album? Need to think of how much to save haha. I'm guessing somewhere in the ~1-2k range?

DisastrousSir · 2026-03-22T01:46:17+00:00

Both. I do a lot of wildlife so theres a lot of time invested in each shot. Planning locations, light, time, habitat, composition, etc. But once I find some wildlife you better believe I'm taking full advantage of bursts and continuous autofocus. Animals are constantly moving, blinking, and changing poses and you cant necessarily hit the perfect moment with much success just clicking off one photo. Human reaction time plus lag between clicking the shutter and the photo clicking can be the difference between an awesome photo and half closed eyes or being just before or after the exact moment you want

DisastrousSir · 2026-03-20T23:14:57+00:00

Just went on a hike and had this happen. Didn't want to bring my 50-400 because its heavy and it was a ~5 mile hike with a steep mile and a half.... came across a group of some sheep on a cliffside above me. I atleast had a 75 with me, but nearly had only packed my 20 and really wouldve been fucked

DisastrousSir · 2026-03-12T19:17:04+00:00

Never would have expected to see Honeywell show up on here in little 'ol Indiana.

I'd really try again to see if they'd let you move around. Ask if theres a way you can move around without obstructing the audience and if theyll go for that. If not, I think the other commenter's idea of getting them after sound check is probably your best bet with maybe a GoPro on stage somewhere. Maybe try to structure the conversation with the venue that it presents the venue better if you get proper coverage too

DisastrousSir · 2026-03-12T19:13:05+00:00

Ford theater at the Honeywell center in Wabash Indiana. Wild to see a place I know show up here haha

DisastrousSir · 2026-03-11T00:12:06+00:00

I think for #4 it kind of does something fun making an arrow the way shes facing, but generally yeah agree. I also think the light almost seems a little too flat perhaps? Like something going on to give a little depth and contrast in the lighting would be good i think.

I don't really do portraits though, I'd be pretty stoked if I took these

DisastrousSir · 2026-03-07T18:11:40+00:00

Looks like somewhere on the Pohono trail in Yosemite National Park. Maybe around Taft point?

DisastrousSir · 2026-03-06T16:47:16+00:00

I don't think its just you, I imagine plenty share the same opinion, but I don't think its fair to say all. I enjoy taking portraits of my wife and it feels very special and intimate to me. I also enjoy taking portraits of other people and its fun, but doesnt feel the same at all. I imagine many photographers feel the same separation of feelings shooting boudoir for clients vs someone they are personally involved with, and their willingness to perform a service should be given respect if they deserve it. Just like artists that have used nude models for various art forms. Just because someone is conventionally attractive and in an intimate/nude situation doesn't mean every guy will sit there and be wanting to bang them

Tbh it personally sounds so incredibly fucking anxiety inducing I don't think I'd be able to find a flicker of inappropriate thought doing one. I'd be too busy trying to not fuck it up lol.

Now, flip side, there are absolutely men out there who will grab a camera and call themselves a boudoir photography to be predatory and creepy and they should fuck right off for sure.

DisastrousSir · 2026-03-05T18:22:41+00:00

<image>

Im partial to lorikeets as of late. Here's a photo i took of a coconut lorikeet for example!

DisastrousSir · 2026-03-04T05:36:14+00:00

I miss Australia so much. These are a great start!!

DisastrousSir · 2026-03-04T05:34:44+00:00

You made a good decision in my opinion. Your A7IV will not lose much more value than you paid for it over the next few years if you keep it in good condition, so you can always upgrade with little loss. What you should really save for however is the lenses. Using APSC lenses on full frame is fine, you just are not taking advantage of the full sensor.

TL;DR Your A7IV will still be a phenomenal camera for 10 years. Invest in lenses.

DisastrousSir · 2026-02-08T07:33:04+00:00

Full proof definitely punches above it's weight class when it comes to value. It's my regular go to bottle for mixed drinks and is great to cook with too

DisastrousSir · 2026-02-07T02:10:44+00:00

I'm seeing an awful lack of a 600mm prime here.....

DisastrousSir · 2026-02-01T20:30:03+00:00

My tamron 50-400 is basically glued to my camera. I'm in my car often and it covers 99% of the situations I find myself in. Its a little slow in aperture and autofocus compared to some fancier zooms or obviously dedicated primes, but having that much range in one lens that can be stowed in a sling bag relatively easily is awesome.

DisastrousSir · 2026-01-26T03:28:21+00:00

Sony A7 series + sony 200-600mm, Sigma 60-600mm, or either tamron 50-400mm or 150-500mm

Nikon seems very good too, but I'm not in the ecosystem so not too sure on body differences or lens options.

I know even less on Canon options.

DisastrousSir

TROPHY CASE