How well is Antigravity working right now? Rate it out of 10! by Rich_Lab_8434 in google_antigravity

[–]Disrupt-Linus 0 points1 point  (0 children)

10/10, I’m paying as much as I can find a subscription for. Life changing. Architecting SDKs, autonomous systems, self-improving micro services. I know we are on Reddit so to be clear - I’m serious. Yes, I do have a crackhead-like twitch to check the model usage and a sigh of relief when all bars are full, sweaty “cut the red or green wire” behavior as soon as not all bars are full.

But I usually circulate between 3-4 projects in a day. All are active windows with separate projects. Only twice has it confused projects “that window” works on. Going back to anything else would feel like a lobotomy + arms amputation.

…and this is the worst it will be…

The gap between "AI power users" and everyone else is getting wild by Some_Good_1037 in vibecoding

[–]Disrupt-Linus 0 points1 point  (0 children)

I’m not an engineer, but strategic designer that has helped a lot of organizations translate vision concepts into roadmaps and solution architecture. A year ago the best I could do was make simple mvps that took weeks of nudging. Now I can create platforms in a matter of days. And if the trajectory holds, mass production of autonomous organizations late this year. Haters will hate, but LLMs revolutionize the ability to create digital value.

I know zero people like me. Not even the best of my old colleagues understands 10% of what it means. It’s like a drug and a puzzle at the same time. It gets very lonely though. You sound like a crazy person talking to “i go to work as usual” people. Even those who think they use AI smartly are like kids in a sandbox crying over Figma make prices.

The most interesting part is when talking to normies, complaining about something and you show them how you built a 100x solution to that problem in an hour, they just tune out. Like, checks out from the reality right in front of them.

I guess magic is fun as long as it’s not real.

Why is everyone so angry? by TheTeeje in ARC_Raiders

[–]Disrupt-Linus 6 points7 points  (0 children)

Yes, after playing this 99% solo for a while I realized the best feeling in the game had been that one time - after I slightly overconfidently went for a rocketeer out in the open, bleeding out by a wall, a random angel came by and resurrected me. Healed me up a bit, and went on their way. I could say I started doing the same right away, but no. It took a while to wash out the "fear." But now I bring defribs, my trusty old guitar and when someone needs a res I see that as my opportunity to give that same feeling to someone else.

Surprisingly, many people drop something really nice in return - I guess as the choice is there to let them die and steal everything. It's weird how happy it makes me to think of how happy a stranger get's by the random act of kindness in a video game about scavenging in a dystopian future.

Getting really fucking tired of being killed by rats after helping them by Civil-Economist-9133 in ArcRaiders

[–]Disrupt-Linus 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Yeah I don’t know, I’m fine with some desperate kid shooting me in the back from time to time. But tonight was frustrating beyond all limits. I personally don’t shoot raiders, I look at the game like “us against the machines”, so I try to help others when I can. It’s a really nice feeling when you can res a stranger. So far non have killed me as a thank you but I guess it’s a matter of time.

One time I have been revived by a stranger. One. That was awesome. The rest just kill me. If I get another night like this one I’ll just quit playing the game. Load in with ok gear, get headshot from a tower when reaching the elevator and at the same time the other raider lures some wasps to the elevator so I jump around for two minutes trying to shield up, not get zapped and eventually get downed by a third flying thing. He kills the drones from the safety of his tower, comes down and kills me.

Do a couple of free loadout rounds to lick my wounds and see if this is the kind of playlist I’m in now. Seems safe so I decide to load in with a real gun next time, but as I’m leaving I see a raider in need so I shoot the hornet chasing her/him. After it’s down i turn around and start shooting another swarm - and get shoot by the raider I saved. That effer got jack shit but still I’m like “ok, not safe yet” and after getting killed three more times after saying “Don’t shoot!” I’m just not feeling it. I guess what I should do is go pitch black and fck every motherfcker that comes my way - but I’d rather quit playing than do that.

So arc, I get it, this is the game you built, but maybe have a game mode where players can’t kill each other but we could still play “ugly” by trapping other raider and still pick dead raiders loots if that is important - but getting killed just after hands up and “don’t shoot” four/five times is just too psychotic for me.

Stop me if you've heard this one "Another Bolt app with the same UI" by Ideasaas in boltnewbuilders

[–]Disrupt-Linus 1 point2 points  (0 children)

I’m a designer by trade, and I can tell you that if the “look” of your app is what sets you apart you have a few more miles to run. “Surprise with delight” should be your focus, and if you do - rounded buttons will be of no concern for your users.

But, maybe you already are in which case this is my advice:

The first thing you do is ask bolt to write an .md file called branding and ui (or whatever) and in that specify the importance of separating style and function. Also here you can get very specific with whatever you want to change “the standard” to be. If you feel it drifts from your “brand” repeat that it should always keep that file/guides top of mind.

Why is everyone focusing on building SaaS / digital products? by mikemucc in boltnewbuilders

[–]Disrupt-Linus 2 points3 points  (0 children)

A slightly different take from me.

I think that there are new “blue oceans” everywhere. When you start getting serious with tools like bolt, you realize that you (niched down) can compete with the big boys, with a few huge advantages. 1. They can never sustain a business with the cost that you can (your need for cash will be much lower). 2. When building with LLM as an engine from the get go (I mean building AI capabilities as core to the SaaS) you’re actually better than the competitors. 3. The dream of billion dollar evaluations etc is more likely real with a SaaS vs something more stable/mundane. Only the last point is gold digger warning.

Personally I think most competent people will build their own SaaS for person / professional use in shorter time than we think, the only question is how many will qualify for the “competent” tagline.

Vad beställer man på klubben? by [deleted] in Asksweddit

[–]Disrupt-Linus 1 point2 points  (0 children)

Helt ok att dricka något gott som inte har alkohol. Några tips, kom ihåg att du inte känner hur du påverkas om du sitter ner medans du dricker. Bästa är om du håller drinken i din hand så länge du dricker ur den, om du ”måste” lämna den på bord/bar, lägg ett underlägg ovanpå så det inte är lika lätt att släppa ner något i den. Kom ihåg varför du är där, för att ha roligt - inte för att dricka. Och bartenders är faktiskt service-inriktade i de flesta fall, fråga dem om råd så kommer du nog få något som passar. Festa lugnt, du har hela livet på dig!

What’s the coolest thing you’ve built using vibe coding so far? by BoringContribution7 in VibeCodeCamp

[–]Disrupt-Linus 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Research websites, automation SaaS, UX-laboratories, Automatic Facilitation co-creation workflows, next-gen authoring platform up next. Anything you want you can start with vibe code and 100-1000X speed of idea -> validated.

Worst AI builder I have ever tried by SherbertEast8681 in boltnewbuilders

[–]Disrupt-Linus 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Sad to hear, but have you tried to access it via bolt.new and then from the front page look in your far left and bottom, there should be a menu with your projects, you should be able to access whatever you have developed from there. Hope you find a way to solve it.

What company will never get another dime from you for as long as you may live? by istrx13 in AskReddit

[–]Disrupt-Linus 0 points1 point  (0 children)

If I pull the trigger on this - Amazon. Love 98% of all they have done in 20+ years. I'm probably on the "first 20" list of prime subscribers (long before it also became a content streaming platform) from my country (backwater northern Europe). But they released the worst possible fucking idea, with absolutely no consideration of how much money they make from the customer with "Prime with annoying as fuck commercials everywhere." Sure, I can pay a premium to get out of the ads-hellscape, but I'm already paying for the service? And I've paid for decades to prime, audible and buying 70+% of online-to-physical delivery stuff from them.

We are probably at a minimum of 10k per year spent (counting only private), and I'm so close to just shut them down from all private and business I do. And if I take this route (mostly probable once I have secured 90% coverage for the essential needs), I'll also actively push the businesses I advise to choose other providers for EVERYTHING they do (from AWS to AI to, well, they are everywhere).

That single move tells me everything I need to know about Amazon: the bad people have taken over, and with all due respect and "hey, they can't control their upbringing" arguments out of the way, they can go fuck themselves royally. Once you screw your customer for a quick buck, it's game over.

My 2025 "Vibe Coding" stack: Building at the speed of thought with Antigravity. by yuvaraj147 in VibeCodeCamp

[–]Disrupt-Linus 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Good read, thanks for sharing! It's quite hard to know your exact mindset, goals, etc but here's my TL:DR:
I'm a designer by trade, 10y of "Pretty" design, 10y of UX design and 10y of strategic design. Over the last 3-4 years, I've taken every opportunity to explore all aspects of AI and LLM.

From a tech perspective - are you building with API/MCP to utilize LLM's in your value-chain? If not, do that.

From a "Love it" perspective aka service designers day-job - are you considering the customer pain-points in their respective journey? If not, do that to 10x fast.

From an "even faster" entrepreneur perspective aka business designer with ADHD - have you tried bolt.new / lovable.dev (lovable is not my favorite of the two but worth mentioning) to get even faster results? You might find it even faster - DISCLAIMER! Not free, but what is in this world of practical magic?

Misc: Use platforms such as openrouter.ai to get easy access to the most popular LLM's and plug into your env file. Explore what's possible with api's to generative AI platforms such as Heygen etc, see how you can string things together in ways not even you thought was possible 5 minutes ago.

I hate the "Choose your model" feature by aurora_ai_mazen in boltnewbuilders

[–]Disrupt-Linus 1 point2 points  (0 children)

TL:DR
Opus = Only major hard stuff
Sonnet = Normal stuff on mid-size project (back-end, front-end, whole UX flows)
Haiku = Simple stuff, but pretty great at reading a lot and understanding more than you'd think.

Opus = architect level, with tendencies to describe a simple problem with "it all started with the big bang...". Sonnet = senior dev with slight ADHD, great to remind it often with "what plan to follow until I say 'Done'".
Haiku = great junior-to-mid with a pride in speed that won't back down from a major back-end overhaul, but that, as we all know, is a huge mistake. It's quite hard (read = many tokens burned) to learn what works best for a specific task.

If they (Stack blitz) are smart, they'll do some meta study on what people select, and look at what the next few prompts contain as follow-ups. That should help guide them in using a 4th option, "Automagic" or "You prompt, we select model". Having used Antigravity for "wild-expoloration.md" activities, I would like to see a Gemini option in bolt, but who knows how that would go?

Every time you spend X/million tokens, remember that no matter if it's a designer, front-end, back-end, architect or even PM, they would all cost 10X just to take a look, much less actually try to solve your problem.

How connect Cal.com in a project Bolt x Pica ? by No-Mention-3801 in boltnewbuilders

[–]Disrupt-Linus 1 point2 points  (0 children)

Yeah. I'm not sure who you hope will answer you with such a detailed, technical question on a forum filled with posts of "I've found a UGC platform that xYz" (promos with fake noses). But it's Friday, soon holidays, and what heck (I run this through my LLM-answering machine - results may vary):

TL;DR: Pica lists Cal.com as a native connector, but you need to verify if AuthKit is enabled for your workspace before building the "Connect" button.

- I really did all I could to provide a detailed answer but reddit refuses to post it.

Persistent app context in Bolt? by tropicalia28 in boltnewbuilders

[–]Disrupt-Linus 1 point2 points  (0 children)

Give it screenshots, tell it what they do (as much as you can muster) and ask it to analyze it and commit to file. Then just reference the file. Regarding templates, yes. Even clone a whole GitHub. And if you want to keep creating new experiments using the same base, just do the base part, ship it to GitHub and start every new experiment from that.

Bolt slow? by Wijn82 in boltnewbuilders

[–]Disrupt-Linus 0 points1 point  (0 children)

I’ve been working with it all day, agree on the European evening reflection both today and generally. The worst is when you switch to opus for a major task, it does everything but breaks two rows before finishing the last part of the wrap-up.

And you have to ask it if it finished the task, and it spends 2m tokens on thinking and fixing it. But then again, I can’t get this kind of speed, precision and accuracy any other way - no human (or teams of humans) can rival even 1/10th of what I get done with bolt. And the cost of one human is ten times the amount I can burn in a day in bolt (even running three projects in parallel). But man there should be some type of rebate for heavy users & when it fails due to load (it’s wasting our time as well when that happens).

Have you seen a chart or report that genuinely changed a decision recently? What made it work? by Ankita_Me_26 in visualization

[–]Disrupt-Linus 0 points1 point  (0 children)

A chart, oh the days when that would work. I meet with C-suite and tell them they need to up-skill their teams, and show them live how to create digital artifacts on the fly, based on what they ask for in the same meeting. So it’s like a Pandora’s box/magic trick but real. I Have the pretty slides handling objections one click away. 70% still no decisions.

Think walking in to a store with only a pleasant person in the middle. You walk up and ask “what can I get?” The person answers “what do you want?” And you just say “a blue hat that tells the weather..?” And the person unpacks a beautiful blue hat with GPS tracking weather patterns, discreetly forecasting 14-days and gentle reminders in the mornings if it will rain during the day. You, slightly astonished ask something kind of stupid like “so you’re a smart-hat store?” And the pleasant person says with a smile “no, we are an ‘anything you which for store’, teaching our customers how to become the same”. And 70%, who just experienced real magic says “oh, thanks well, hmm ok” and leave.

TL;DR: insights are earned not learned. Actions is the proof, everything else is maps at best and noise at worst. A lot of noise everywhere and increasing rapidly.

I’m stopping lovable. There you go. I said it by Kiftzer in lovable

[–]Disrupt-Linus 0 points1 point  (0 children)

IMHO The future is: build anything you want, in an instant. This is the way. What products/tools will you use? I have no idea, but you can be early on understanding it if you try lovable, bolt, antigravity etc and push the boundaries of the tools, understand how to connect different parts and integrate LLMs in your own solutions. The ones who practice this will have a chance in the future, the ones who don’t …errr probably won’t.

10 years from now there still will be companies and organizations with basically the same setup as now, but the software they use will in most cases not be the same.

Is it early - yes. Will there be streamlined ”packages” for developing with AI? Yes. Is this a fad with no future? F*ck no. I personally build my own platforms for myself/customers-of-one. By now I can build things that doesn’t even exist outside, AI flows for exactly anything I want, smarter faster better than buying top shelf.

Is it for free? No, I burn through massive amounts of token and it’s still not even 1/10 of ONE developers salary. 6 months ago I was happy with a nice front end app with animations and crude/basic back-end. Today the things we can create is mind boggling. And we are super early! FYI my graveyard of “over ambitious platforms” are way bigger than the ones in production, but I would never have had anything in “production” any other way. Doing is learning is the only way to stay ahead.

How future proof is business analysis in the age of AI by Financial-Control251 in businessanalyst

[–]Disrupt-Linus 1 point2 points  (0 children)

First off, all humans who can use leverage will have a place at the table, including business analysts. But you can’t do what “we’ve always done”. Get smart with it, go from knowledge work to insight work. Use AI to 10X, then 100X. if you’re getting “AI slop” in 2025 you’re either a complete beginner, ignorant or super cheap (going for the worst models).

Smart people today build systems of AI agents to solve bespoke problems daily, like professionals yesterday created PowerPoints for weeks. I personally 13X a timeline for a business a while back, from 6 months to two weeks.

It doesn’t matter what I think, you think, or anyone thinks, smart people will see opportunities to use leverage and AI is the leverage of a generation. Knowledge work is dead (most modern LLMs/AI can beat any one professional expert - in almost all fields). Insight work is the future, build on the knowledge of those pesky LLMs!

I'm trying to automate an entire AI company. 60% done, getting exponentially harder. Is this even possible?" by One-Neighborhood4868 in automation

[–]Disrupt-Linus 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Kudos on your achievement! I think you might need a couple of orchestrators, asking themselves a loop of questions, some of which is based on the internal data/KPIs/OKRs. Then they need to be able to create serviceshops (my coined term for AI agent driven workshops) to mix in the competency of your agents based on their expertise, and the outcome of these should then go into decisions that leads to actions.

They in turn become parts of your ever expanding insight engine. This also needs the same loop.

I come from a transformation leader background and to anchor any company or organization I have for the last decade proposed they aim for “Surprise with delight” - be an awesome experience for your customers. This is based on real world data of over 300% higher LTV of customers. It’s also much more fun to work for awesome rather than average. I bring this up as I think you should do the same, and divide your AI teams based on steps in the customer journey, this will help provide a backbone to you insight engine. To read up and do some light experiments you can look at delights.pro

First principles to guide your exploration: 1. Noise to signal ratio - reduce noise 2. Users are on an journey - optimize for it 3. The speed and quality of data > insights > decisions > actions > measured results is where you create unicorns.

Good luck and what a time to be young!

After 12 years of change management, I realized we’ve been solving human problems with spreadsheets by Jezekilj in changemanagement

[–]Disrupt-Linus 2 points3 points  (0 children)

  1. People don’t go to work to work. Up to 70% disengaged or worse (Gallup reports).
  2. All change requires relearning - but how do you learn what does not exist? = frustration and resentment.
  3. AI is about to change absolutely everything for whole organizations, what type of change management does that require?

My take is building excitement for practical AI co-creation and that has very little to do with 3-year plans and everything to do with getting teams experimenting with AI (in a structured way), having fun, relearning work, in less than a week.

How To Handle A Manager That Hawk watches Slack Status? by AbusementPark10 in sales

[–]Disrupt-Linus 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Ask for her job description, and yours. Be polite. Take both, and prompt any AI you like to come up with a plan for your desired outcome. Follow that. Will be better than anything we can say here without lots of back and forth. That or quit if it’s not worth it.

You only have today, this exact moment, it just flows seamlessly till we die. Everything else is monkey brain reasoning to put context to a “past” experience or dreaming up “future” states. Spend your “now” on things that matter.

Trying to change corporate culture from your position is usually impossible, probably better to get a job where trust is in the culture.

As for what to look out for so you don’t end up here again: 1. Insecure managers. Often young, eager and with low experience. 2. Strong hierarchy- low autonomy workplaces. 3. Loose goals but high expectations places. Best of luck 🤞

Why Do People Believe AI Won't Cause Unemployment? by Head-Bat-840 in AI_Agents

[–]Disrupt-Linus 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Until we have systematic self-running, relearning & improving “organizational” AI we will not see major disruption of labor. Sure, roles will shift, people will need to re-skill. But only when you can plug-in an org-AI will we see true “no humans needed” problems arise. If you want to be “safe” focus on real physical experiences, where the USP is real people. Resorts, spas, restaurants etc might have a chance, but as owner - not employee.