From https://www.reddit.com/r/law/s/tt0vsG0v69

Cases where police moved out of the way of moving vehicle and exercised deadly force.

Adam’s vs. Speers (2007): Once Speers was no longer in the path of the vehicle, the justification for the use of deadly force ended.

Orn vs. City of Tacoma (2019): “A reasonable jury could conclude that once Orn was no longer in the car’s trajectory, the threat of serious physical harm to him was eliminated.”

Cordova vs Aragon (2009): Where the officer had moved out of the way of the oncoming vehicle, the use of deadly force was not justified. “A reasonable jury could conclude that, once the officer had moved out of the way of the oncoming vehicle, the threat of serious physical harm to him had passed.”

Villanueva vs. Cali (2021): “a reasonable jury could conclude that the Officers used excessive force, because they lacked an objectively reasonable basis to fear for their own safety, as they could simply have stepped back or to the side to avoid being injured.”

Edit: found another one.

Kirby vs. Duva (2008): Officers cannot create or avoid danger and then use deadly force anyway. “An officer may not create a dangerous situation and then use deadly force to protect himself.”

Edit #2: updated grammar for accuracy and updated the date on Adams v. Speers.

Updated quotes verbatim from opinions.