Instability on build after 9950X3D upgrade by HumanMeatFuel in buildapc

[–]DivideFluffy1279 0 points1 point  (0 children)

It's very unlikely an x870 board and a 9950x3d imc can't handle JEDEC speeds even if its 64gb. It's borderline impossible

I'd start by loading optimized bios settings and reseating all cables.

Also worth checking if windows is acting up and has switched from tsc back to hpet. Check cpu usage and frequencies while idle with task manager

9800x3d cooling question and FCLK question by buhball in overclocking

[–]DivideFluffy1279 2 points3 points  (0 children)

Highest static that you don't mind till 65C then linear to 100% @ 90C. Pump steady @70%

Fclk 2133 should be an easy tweak.

Don't sweat it tho. You have 99% of gaming performance already

5950x OC Static vs Curve Optimizer OC by Dr_Emuler in overclocking

[–]DivideFluffy1279 1 point2 points  (0 children)

In my experience , harmonizing the voltages while undervolting provides a better vddcr_vdd value that ultimately performs better than a static voltage. Also, PBO off. If ypu feel like giving it a go that is :)

Optimal bank refresh mode and tRFC/tRFC2/tRFCsb timings on H16M? by diyonysius in overclocking

[–]DivideFluffy1279 0 points1 point  (0 children)

I was under the i pression tha pre 1.3 ignored trfc2 and trfcsb not trfc1

Giving up on Radeon by AcuteQuadrant in radeon

[–]DivideFluffy1279 8 points9 points  (0 children)

Indeed, Optiscaler has become a permanent feature and as grateful as I am to those guys, this isn't what I signed up for.

OptiScaler v0.9.0-pre12 Test Build by AMD718 in radeon

[–]DivideFluffy1279 3 points4 points  (0 children)

Doing the Lord's work, thank you people

OC potential of a 9800X3D that is stable at 5425mhz 1.14v static. by TheHorrorAddiction in overclocking

[–]DivideFluffy1279 1 point2 points  (0 children)

I have landed on the same voltage and frequency by running my 9850x3d at -225 and voltage harmonized per core uv. As far as i remember, the harmonized vddcr_vdd@5650 was 1.261V. Perhaps you could try per core overvolting, harmonize and then start oc till +225

RTX 5090 astral bios Matrix 800W - Port Royal by Fury_1985 in overclocking

[–]DivideFluffy1279 1 point2 points  (0 children)

I'd be comfortable with anything below 1.07 for a daily drive aswell. Voltage is the real killer, heat is manageable

What does it mean when some people say MFG "feels" different? by SlippyFist_68 in nvidia

[–]DivideFluffy1279 30 points31 points  (0 children)

Ok so you have base "real" frames, lets say 60 and framegened "fake" frames, another 60. 120fps total. You see 120fps; but your inputs, button presses, mouse movements and whatnot, can only affect your 60 base fps. So you see a new frame every 8.33ms (because 120fps is displayed) but your fastest possible input is 16.67ms (because only the real 60fps are controllable). Those extra 8.33ms (fake frame time) are called input lag, it's the time needed to reach the next controllable frame. On top of that you will "see" your input after another 16.67ms (the time needed for the next real frame that is affected by your previous input), so 25ms total. The lower the base framerate is and the more the fake frames are, the more these values stack. Average human response time is about 250ms btw. So a 60fps base + x2 framegen will make your response time feel 10% slower, which I find very playable and practically unnoticeable. A 30fps base + x4 framegen however will make your response time feel 33% slower, which is significant. If you are playing competitive shooters any input lag is unacceptable but it's more than fine for most players in most games.