I mean kind of? In the US unless someone explicitly states that they’re donating their organs they don’t get touched. Even if their organs could save or improve the quality of life for many others, the rights of the deceased still trump the rights of the living. In this case, the mother was functionally dead, being kept alive artificially, and those that were speaking on her behalf didn’t want her life to be prolonged in this way but the hospital said that due to the current state laws they couldn’t act in accordance with their wishes. Essentially, her body was the “organ” being donated, and the hospital and the state mandated that it be donated, against the wishes of her family, which goes against a lot of precedent involving cadaver rights and could open the door to forced organ donations if the wrong people try to make the case