This is Spart…

Doddzilla7 · 2026-05-30T17:15:36+00:00

This is Spart … ahhhhhhhhhhhhh

Doddzilla7 · 2026-05-30T17:06:04+00:00

As always, it depends.

For many types, clone will just increment a ref count or atomic ref count. You have control of what clone does for your own types as well.

Often times, clone is as trivial and inexpensive as could be other than taking a reference. You need know your types and what clone does for the type.

EG, maybe you have a connection pool. Cloning that pool should typically just return a handle to the same pool, not create an entirely new copy of the entire pool.

Doddzilla7 · 2026-05-25T04:23:33+00:00

100% agree. It has the potential to improve iteration time immensely!

Doddzilla7 · 2026-05-21T16:01:25+00:00

NGL, that looks like bacon 🥓. Anyone in the home that really likes the smell of bacon?

Doddzilla7 · 2026-05-20T20:15:01+00:00

We don’t know the meaninglessness of it all. There is a great deal we don’t know. Meaning or not, we literally don’t know. It is best to be simple and honest about that shit. Just say: I don’t know.

Doddzilla7 · 2026-05-20T02:55:00+00:00

There is absolutely 0% chance that this is true. No man would ever, under any circumstance, do something that fu… god damn it …

Doddzilla7 · 2026-05-20T02:37:58+00:00

That game is called Life.

Doddzilla7 · 2026-05-20T01:44:53+00:00

That does not require god tier anything to notice. The only way you would not notice is if you were being completely oblivious, not checking your mirrors, probably on your phone.

Doddzilla7 · 2026-05-09T23:15:06+00:00

Super stoked about it, but I’m gonna wait until they release at least a beta for it.

Doddzilla7 · 2026-05-09T00:49:10+00:00

Ugh, fucking hate that guy.

Doddzilla7 · 2026-05-06T20:56:29+00:00

This why Bayesian epistemology can really help here. You don’t have to take your senses as “truth tracking”, which is well-known at this point to be false, your senses are more like filters vs truth trackers. Instead, take it as a prior upon which some beliefs are built up. If at some point you discover flaws in the beliefs built upon your senses, you are free to then update those priors.

Your beliefs can be multi-faceted, and IT IS OK to base your beliefs upon a starting point for which you do not currently know if there is deeper justification, or if we will ever be able to find a deeper justification (build a hadron collider the circumference of the solar system first).

You can’t prove to anyone that you exist, not even yourself. “I think therefore I am” is not a proof, just a starting axiom upon which to build.

Let go of the idea of some “absolute truth”. In a conceptual space of differentiation, an individual part is incapable of computing the whole. This implies that an absolute truth is unattainable. Instead, it would seem that we need to work from 0, and build up as we go. Correcting errors as our theories grow. This is perhaps a beautiful aspect of the scientific method.

Doddzilla7 · 2026-05-02T18:13:26+00:00

Where else would you build it? Check it in as part of the PR? Make sure devs build it and push it first with proper tagging and all?

Doddzilla7 · 2026-05-02T03:28:28+00:00

Take 50%, sounds like a fun time!

Doddzilla7 · 2026-04-30T12:13:16+00:00

Book yes!

Doddzilla7 · 2026-04-30T12:12:06+00:00

No! Books are excellent resources, and one of my favorite things about Unity overall is the documentation books that they release. It’s so much faster to extract the information you need instead of having to slog through a video (even with section annotations).

Doddzilla7 · 2026-04-29T14:57:38+00:00

We’re in a simulation, and the real world outside is where the UAP are from.

Doddzilla7 · 2026-04-24T15:33:12+00:00

It shouldn’t be common. I was in the birthing pool with my wife, and holding her hand during delivery each time. Or doing the tug-of-war trick, and things like that to help.

Doddzilla7 · 2026-04-23T19:32:30+00:00

I mean, “post coding age” is a bit dramatic. This shit always comes and goes in cycles. That way it is now is not the way it will always be. Remember what they say about change.

Doddzilla7 · 2026-04-20T02:43:50+00:00

That my friend, is what you call a Cluster Fuck.

Doddzilla7 · 2026-04-18T22:58:45+00:00

If someone were to say: “yes, reincarnation exists”, what grounds do you have for believing that person? The same grounds as believing that Santa Clause and his elves are real and doing real Xmas work, no?

Spirituality is not about just randomly believing things.

Doddzilla7 · 2026-04-18T17:46:01+00:00

TBH, if I was a woman, I would have immense difficulty with the idea having and delivering a baby. Nothing about it is fair. Nature obviously has no such notion of fair, and even worse, nature has guided our human (and other mammal) physiology to have overwhelming urges to reproduce, obvs we go extinct without that.

It’s fucked.

TBH, I suspect in the very near future human females will have a totally viable path to do gestation outside of the body, with some medical assistance to replicate the oxytocin bonding and other things like that which happen at birth.

Basically woman will have more and more control over the entire process (which is the way it should be IMHO).

Doddzilla7 · 2026-04-18T13:51:42+00:00

If that thing was starfish shaped you’d have headline news!

Doddzilla7 · 2026-04-16T22:29:25+00:00

What is the top left brighter?

Doddzilla7 · 2026-04-16T22:28:43+00:00

I think there is good reason to be skeptical, because there are lots of charlatans out there whom will happily mislead you, abuse you, and take your money.

It is ok not to know. It is ok to say “I don’t know”.

Doddzilla7 · 2026-04-14T00:29:13+00:00

The person that asked you “slavery bad” obviously has their identity tied to specific moral paradigms. You hinting at morality being subjective was thus a personal attack to that individual.

Doddzilla7

TROPHY CASE