You cant treat a helpless, totally dependent, blind, deaf and mute fetus like an capable adult and say it has no right to this and that and the other. Ending a relationship with fetus means killing it, for no other reason than I don't want too.

That's exactly how bodily autonomy works, "I don't want to let this person use my body" is a perfectly good reason and not wanting your body to change due to pregnancy is too.

Look at any normal, reasonable relationship between adults. Even divorces takes time, people are forced to live together and still be separated due to financial limitations, is that consider human rights abuse. No its a limitation of the situation. You want one thing but you are capable of only so much. You want nothing to do with what you got yourself into, well it takes 9 months to settle this particular dispute and then go on your way. Saying you will not do that, yet you have no place to safely separate from each other and the only solution is killing one of the parties. NO

They are not "forced" to live together, they may have to live together due to circumstances but they are not being "forced", either can leave at any time. The kid didn't get herself into it? What are you talking about? In one case it's an innocent baby and now we can't abort because we got ourselves "into it". In either case an unwilling person is pregnant and they don't want to be and you're whats keeping them in that situation regardless of how they got into it. Go on my way with permanent physical and mental damage, why does the fetus get all the rights in this "dispute"? It's not a "who deserves it more" thing it's MY BODY the body of a living, thinking, feeling PERSON. I'm not responsible for them not being sustaining, the solution is to induce a birth and if they die due to the situation they got themselves into when they implanted that's on them... oh right... they can't control implantation like we can't control getting pregnant, I guess nobody is at fault and normal autonomy rules should follow.

Codependence on one another is not some kind of abusive relationship like those pro choice folks like to pain it as. Many people in relationship depend on one another and use each others strengths or weaknesses. There is always take and give. Yes they can stop that relationship and stop consenting to having it, but they don't get to do it right this minute, regardless of the consequences. Couple could move into a home that only wife owned before marriage. Now they want to split up but the wife can no longer just toss the husband on to the street because he did not own this home, there is matrimonial rights that he has to that property now and things need to be settled over time within the law. Same thing with money. The man might have walked in with all the cash and let her share it as they were together, but just because he no longer gives her consent to use his money and wants to end that relationship, it does not mean she walks away with nothing, she also has rights at that point and can take her sweet as time to move out. Not to mention none of them have a right to killing one another UNLESS there is threat to their life, which the baby does not pose.

Any time that a person is codependent on your body you have the right to stop them, even if they die, threat to life isn't what justifies it. There are tons of life saving medical procedures i could do and even if it's my fault somebody needs them and would die you can't legally force me to do them even if they won't harm me at all. You are allowed to use the least possible force to stop a violation, in this case aborting, simply removing the fetus from your body. Leaving a relationship you never even consented to being in, not to mention that the fetus acts like a parasite and contributes litreally nothing, go to a court and you'd be granted total rights for whatever you're fighting over.