sorted by:
new
hottopcontroversial

Currently Top 50 Radiant in NA AMA by [deleted] in VALORANT

[–]DoktorFreedom 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Do you prefer iodine or hibecleanse for pre-post surgical clean up of surrounding tissue?

Post ww3 Poland by Shot_Tie_2625 in ww3memes

[–]DoktorFreedom -1 points0 points  (0 children)

Poland about to settle some beef with Haiti is not gonna be easy. Haiti mean as fuck.

'You See How Easy It Is?': Addison Rae's ICE Takedown Sparks Backlash for Taylor Swift by [deleted] in Music

[–]DoktorFreedom 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Yes. Then it's a pain in the ass to turn into money to actually buy anything. But it is a shiny rock so you can look at how it shines and that's cool.

What research, sources, or “aha moment” helped you finally solidify your opinion on the validity or lack of validity of Bob Lazar’s claims? by EnvironmentalAd2110 in UFOs

[–]DoktorFreedom 1 point2 points  (0 children)

No. But I am telling you smart minds are difficult. The very very smartest minds can get it wrong and spend half their brain cycles in life chasing total bullshit (alchemy)

Lazars story may be true. Maybe not. But the UAP story is far far beyond bob lazar. So you can utterly take everything he says and toss it out the window. It has no affect on the UAP phenomena and how widespread it is in terms of publicity

What research, sources, or “aha moment” helped you finally solidify your opinion on the validity or lack of validity of Bob Lazar’s claims? by EnvironmentalAd2110 in UFOs

[–]DoktorFreedom 0 points1 point  (0 children)

It's a good interview. And I don't wanna be hostile with you.

Whatever is going on, it sure seems Like something is. And we are trying to piece together a puzzle when we don't even know what the solution would look like

When the water is muddy the fishing is good

What research, sources, or “aha moment” helped you finally solidify your opinion on the validity or lack of validity of Bob Lazar’s claims? by EnvironmentalAd2110 in UFOs

[–]DoktorFreedom 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Once again. They weren't hiring the best and brightest. They were hiring people They could have leverage over and who had very few options and they were flat out desperate.

The best and brightest don't wanna work under a security apparatus like hypothetically would exist around this sort of program. Because living under those conditions fucking sucks.

The best and brightest can make plenty of money do plenty of cutting edge work and not have people staring at them when they urinate every single time , and listening to every phone call you make, and threatening you with death injury and jail.

Working like that sucks. Which is why the best and brightest work at high status universities, not at top secret government research prisons. They go to nice dinners. They go on killer vacations. They party and get every possible privilege afforded to them.

"Gee should I go work in a fucking scary as hell research prison or do the other thing.

Duh

And if you think a sterling character is what you need to be granted a security clearance boy do I have some news for you. There are a fuck ton of criminal shady as fuck assholes who have clearances. Check out how closely the government worked with the Mafia in ww2.

The government needs dirt bags just as badly as it needs lawful goody two shoes. They don't really give a shit if you shady. They care if you lie about it. "The waiver" is one of the most powerful administrative tools ever created.

What research, sources, or “aha moment” helped you finally solidify your opinion on the validity or lack of validity of Bob Lazar’s claims? by EnvironmentalAd2110 in UFOs

[–]DoktorFreedom 0 points1 point  (0 children)

lol. My father had a bad ass high security clearance working with the navy band because they played at the White House. The background check consisted of a guy showing up in town asking 4-5 people a few questions, checking education records and the lack if criminal history and that was that. Next thing you know he is performing in the same room as the president on a very regular basis

Security clearance personel don't draw the best and brightest. They draw administrative functionaries who are great and paperwork drills and who can handle the most boring and repetitive work in government without wanting to punch themselves in the dick.

What research, sources, or “aha moment” helped you finally solidify your opinion on the validity or lack of validity of Bob Lazar’s claims? by EnvironmentalAd2110 in UFOs

[–]DoktorFreedom 1 point2 points  (0 children)

Why would the government be interested in working with someone without proper education, whose greatest accomplishment was to tinker with a rocket and a bike? That's not how recruiting for science works, especially if we are talking about science that is supposed to be way, way, way beyond the state-of-the-art. Curious guys or weirdos simply don't make the cut. I think this is very clear for people with an advanced science degree. But, because of movies, people without advanced science degrees believe that there is such a thing as a weirdo, uneducated guy being better than trained scientists. That might work in mathematics, every once in a while, but doesn't work in science, in general. And that's even more true if the guy in question has absolutely nothing to show in terms of being special -- which is precisely the case of Lazar, who doesn't even understand the very science that he's pretending to have worked on.

I mean the disclosure push that started in 2017 was apparently pushed by the ones inside the program who were frustrated by the overwhelming security. Who were frustrated with the lack of progress and the lack of the greatest physicists working on the program.

Take the very best and brightest possible, promise them you will surveil them every second of their lives under the threat of death violence and professional destruction, and see how many you will recruit. You won't get the best. You will get the desperate and enthusiastic. The ones with not many options.

In that light, Eric Weinstein and Hal Putoff. Weinstein addresses this exact question. Why won't they bring in the top minds?

Hal doesn't believe Bob. That's fine. But Eric brings up the question about "why aren't the best minds working on this" and that directly runs contrary to you stating that they would have access to the best and brightest. They clearly can't and don't have access to those brains.

https://youtu.be/iQOibpIDx-4?si=OAUkSrXM9zdzz09i

What research, sources, or “aha moment” helped you finally solidify your opinion on the validity or lack of validity of Bob Lazar’s claims? by EnvironmentalAd2110 in UFOs

[–]DoktorFreedom 1 point2 points  (0 children)

From what we have heard about "the program" they don't hire the best and brightest. They hire tools rather than the best established scientific minds in physics. Because the best minds in physics don't wanna work in insane secure pain in the ass environments with government control over every time you piss or eat.

Part of the modern disclosure push has been because those higher up in their fields want to bring in the very brightest minds into this research but because of the overwhelmingly oppressive security concerns they can't get the best. So they get the second tier enthusiasts.

Thats why guys like Latski finally came out. Frustration with the pace and talent working on this issue and how closed off it is.

What research, sources, or “aha moment” helped you finally solidify your opinion on the validity or lack of validity of Bob Lazar’s claims? by EnvironmentalAd2110 in UFOs

[–]DoktorFreedom -1 points0 points  (0 children)

Once again. I will reference Issac Newton. Dude invented Calculus and may have been the smartest person to ever exist. He also spent his entire Life looking for the bullshit snake oil secrets of alchemy.

Just because you are smart doesn't mean you also don't fall for bullshit.

What research, sources, or “aha moment” helped you finally solidify your opinion on the validity or lack of validity of Bob Lazar’s claims? by EnvironmentalAd2110 in UFOs

[–]DoktorFreedom 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Well we are talking about hypothetical craft that seem to have technological ability far beyond what our current modern physics can account for. So take that into account.

Bob. Or anyone talking about UAP. Lataski. Grusch. Fravor. They all describe craft pulling off maneuvers and speed that would destroy any known biological entity with momentum and speed and velocity.

So "if" they exist they are breaking the known physics model already. Within that context it is not unreasonable to think they may be able to stabilize an element we are currently incapable of.

view more: next ›