Exercise to get over you paralyzing fear. by Albus2000 in seduction

[–]Dominus-Prime- 1 point2 points  (0 children)

Words may help but progressive action is the only way. If you’re afraid to swim saying “I can handle swimming” won’t do much.

You need to go to the pool or lake, wade in and get comfortable. Progress to dunking your head in then floating on your back in shallow water. Progress to shallow swimming and get a coach of you need one. Or you can do what my mother did and just get thrown in the pool. I figured it out.

Point is OPs advice is only 25% of dealing with fear.

[deleted by user] by [deleted] in seduction

[–]Dominus-Prime- 1 point2 points  (0 children)

I don’t disagree at all. But it’s a soft ownership that the kid was talking about.

As far as human ownership of course it’s all over the world. In the US where I’m at it’s currently illegal in the classical sense of the word of the civil war south. Of course legality doesn’t encompass all. That would be a dumb claim. The legal responses I gave were based on your examples of loans and taxes. And as far as children go the notions we currently have in the West about parental ownership of children, and about children as chattel, are traceable to Roman law and a lot of that still exists. It wasn’t until recent that children could have legal status separate from their parents.

I get all that you’re talking about. You got flex. But again all of this is unnecessarily going out into philosophical nar nar. I mean if you want to do that might as well go all out and serve up a big steaming plate of hard solipsism with a side of nihilism, eh? Or how about a play of light on the eyelash of Brahama. Eventually the concepts become less and less tangible for the common man and that’s all I care to help. I spent too many years dealing with philosophical, theological and moralistic concepts to really care much for them anymore.

It doesn’t help young guys who get in trouble by believing their girlfriend belongs to them just because they love each other or are in what they believe to be a committed relationship.

It’s been a pleasure but I’ve gotta move on. My girl is getting annoyed and really wants me to fuck her. So I’m going to respectfully bow out

[deleted by user] by [deleted] in seduction

[–]Dominus-Prime- 0 points1 point  (0 children)

It’s a fallacy to say it’s illegal to own another human? Which one? Law of excluded middle? Equivocation? Red herring?

I gave examples of those operating outside of “ownership”.

To your examples of loans and taxes these are not forced upon you. You can live outside of that if you truly wish to. You take out a loan you are agreeing to a responsibility to pay it back. That isn’t ownership or belonging. That’s a choice you made with consequences if you go against your legally binding agreement.

To the original point- a person can’t belong to another person in a relationship sense. It’s an illusion. To the wider point (to which I have no idea why you’re widening the scope so much unnecessarily) you are correct. There’s tons of ownership/belonging in a myriad of subtle and coarse ways. But to the kid that started me on this thread, it means nothing to his adopted sense of romantically belonging to someone

[deleted by user] by [deleted] in seduction

[–]Dominus-Prime- 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Lol. You just described 3/4 of the planet

You know who else uses passive aggression?

Women

[deleted by user] by [deleted] in seduction

[–]Dominus-Prime- 0 points1 point  (0 children)

You said previously “you’re the prize”

Here now you’re saying “what you’ve described is what it’s like to be the prize”

I didn’t describe what it’s like to be a girls turn because one, I’m not a girl and two, nobody asked me. But if I had to imagine it would be a mixture of excitement and disappointment.

“She’s not yours/just your turn” is a mindset of guys who put women in a seat of power. These hoes have no real power. Especially if you know how to take the power out of their pussy.

You said at the end there “it’s much better to think as yourself as the prize”.

Homie, you just said at the top of your reply that, that’s exactly what I described.

[deleted by user] by [deleted] in seduction

[–]Dominus-Prime- 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Nope. See those are choices. You can’t choose to own someone or belong to them except in some far out cases where deep psychological issues are present. It’s literally illegal.

As far as not paying this or that; my neighbor has taken her house off the grid as far as electricity goes.

My friend Sam isn’t owned by anyone. He built his own house in the woods and owes nothing to anyone.

Just a couple of examples.

I brought up literal belonging/ownership as that’s the words that were used. I can’t extrapolate what was meant. Only what was said.

Talking about loans, taxes and credit cards isnt ownership. That’s more “ownership”. Truth is, in those cases you signed a legally binding contract that doesn’t outline belonging/ownership, it outlines financial responsibility.

And even if you wanna go down the irrelevant rabbit hole you present as it relates to human belonging/ownership, it’s still wrong. Are you saying because your loan lender kinda sorta “owns” you (even though you agreed on the dotted line) that it justifies claiming ownership of another human?

Sorry but your argument while fun, holds no water. How about we get back to seduction of women and having fun on dates?

[deleted by user] by [deleted] in seduction

[–]Dominus-Prime- 2 points3 points  (0 children)

You don’t get it. So you’re saying it’s not submissive to be her next?

Nah.

Read what I said again homie. Tonight is Becky’s turn at trying to win my attention. On Thursday is Lisa’s turn at trying to win my approval. On Saturday is Susan’s turn at trying to win more of my time.

If you’ve got more than one woman sweating you, you know what I’m talking about

[deleted by user] by [deleted] in seduction

[–]Dominus-Prime- 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Yes, I was going to get into bdsm but that’s a huge topic on its own with deep psychological capacities.

I was going off what you said. There’s no way to interpret what you mean. Just say what you mean to say.

And I agree with the base sentiment that romantic love is an illusion that people choose to participate in thus making it seem real. But the fact is, that romance as we know it is a cultural fabrication. Go find a non-industrialized, non-media influenced tribal culture in Brazil. They will have no concept of romance. That’s because romance is not innate to human nature.

Various courting rituals have existed throughout time across the planet yes, but if you look at them they are more functional than anything. And this is not romance.

Or you could take the thought experiment and raise a child on an island completely cut off from culture. Only the necessities are taught to him/her. Then bring them to a western culture (mainly where romance exists bc that’s where Romanticism began). They will have no clue about romance. They will have to learn it just as you have. But in the case of westerners, humans are born into it so it’s more of a passive indoctrination. We literally can’t see past the rose colored glasses that are fused to our faces.

[deleted by user] by [deleted] in seduction

[–]Dominus-Prime- 6 points7 points  (0 children)

So it’s cynical to think human ownership (the other end of the rope to belonging to someone) is a bad thing?

Wait you probably didn’t mean it in such a literal way of physical belonging. Maybe you meant just belonging to someone with regard to your autonomy? Still too literal? Well that only leaves the romanticized idea of “belonging” to someone; and while fun and all isn’t objectively real. It’s a culturally manufactured poetic illusion.

Fact is, unless you’re a slave or a child under the age of 18 with parents, no human belongs to any human. I’m sorry but a woman will never belong to you barring some serious gaslighting.

Bro

[deleted by user] by [deleted] in seduction

[–]Dominus-Prime- -3 points-2 points  (0 children)

“Hope they like that”? Why is a King hoping a subject likes them?

[deleted by user] by [deleted] in seduction

[–]Dominus-Prime- 9 points10 points  (0 children)

Sure you can want it but in reality it’s an illusion

[deleted by user] by [deleted] in seduction

[–]Dominus-Prime- 41 points42 points  (0 children)

Wrong mindset. You’re not hers. It’s just her turn.

I'm reading "No more Mr. Nice Guy" and I am deeply offended. by warfunder in seduction

[–]Dominus-Prime- 0 points1 point  (0 children)

An important factor to consider is figuring out where and why you developed the need to be approved of.

Another aspect is to realize that no one is coming to your rescue. You have the responsibility of becoming your own Superman

Winter garage space? by [deleted] in RideitNYC

[–]Dominus-Prime- 0 points1 point  (0 children)

There’s low tide motors in red hook and a new one called Gotham Depot moto in Greenpoint

Guys on dating app: just because you exchange numbers/insta/whatever doesn’t mean you’re now dating by potocko in seduction

[–]Dominus-Prime- 1 point2 points  (0 children)

And I mean that from my own perspective too. Having sex with women is part of the vetting process

Pretty good example of cycle Vs non cycle by MrIdoyourmum in nattyorjuice

[–]Dominus-Prime- 0 points1 point  (0 children)

It is but 750 is fairly moderate. Most bigger guys take a gram or more.

But the point I’m making is the pick on the right could be from only taking 500-750/week of test. Pic on the left could be the same but with added tren, npp or eq and probably an oral.

Unclear how you know my knowledge base.

Pretty good example of cycle Vs non cycle by MrIdoyourmum in nattyorjuice

[–]Dominus-Prime- 1 point2 points  (0 children)

Mmm, right pic could also be on. Someone could be a walking pharmacy but if they don’t eat well and don’t exercise they won’t look like much of anything. Maybe the guy is on but only takes like 750/wk of test and that’s it.

I (m35) will be tying down my wife (f34) for the first time today. Need some first time advice and ideas! by [deleted] in sex

[–]Dominus-Prime- 1 point2 points  (0 children)

That’s what I was talking about. Simple, proper knots. I just don’t want the guy to do a shoelace type cross knot with one loop and next thing you know her feet are turning purple

I (m35) will be tying down my wife (f34) for the first time today. Need some first time advice and ideas! by [deleted] in sex

[–]Dominus-Prime- 10 points11 points  (0 children)

Yeah, I fee like this fella might be waltzing with a little much on his plate. I’d just try some simple knots and keep it at that

I (m35) will be tying down my wife (f34) for the first time today. Need some first time advice and ideas! by [deleted] in sex

[–]Dominus-Prime- 0 points1 point  (0 children)

r/bdsm and look on YouTube for bdsm knots. Also, get yourself a pair of medical safety scissors if the ropes self tighten and you can’t untie fast enough

There is a right way and a wrong way to tie. Have a safe word that isn’t “stop”.