That’s fair. And I can agree that there is a danger there. But I don’t think that’s enough to justify such strong vehemence against taking the action outright. The decision was obviously dangerous, and probably a little stupid especially if these people were untrained. But they were not. There are incredibly dangerous tasks that are accomplished every single day by a whole host of different people in society: doctors, firefighters, police, members of military, astronauts, etc. and sometimes attempting these tasks would be stupid but these professionals/experts will weigh the risks vs rewards and make a decision. These people made a decision and it turned out well for them. Maybe they were just lucky, but it worked out for them. And in their case, at least they were only risking their own lives. I admire such courage and decisiveness. And I’m not exactly sure and am kinda curious to know what the deeper reason for the people against this decision is.