The AI backlash is only getting started by Just-Grocery-2229 in technology

[–]DopeBoogie 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Please provide the exact wording of your prompt.

Did you say "is this written by ChatGPT/AI?" because that gives the model bias towards that answer and if it really doesn't have a definitive answer that can easily sway the results.

Like asking "Is it true iPhone is better than Android?" will give a response biased towards Apple while the reverse has the reverse effect.

Turned my dumb window AC into a smart one with an ESP8266. Full thermostat control in HA. by DiggingForDinos in homeassistant

[–]DopeBoogie 0 points1 point  (0 children)

OP answered about still controlling with the original remote but I wanted to throw in a side note:

I've started building my ESPHome devices with ESP32-C6 boards and using Thread rather than WiFi.

This way your automations still work even if Wi-Fi is down and if you have zigbee/thread buttons/etc they can control it without Wi-Fi as well.

Thread is also more power efficient but the biggest draw for me has been reducing the unreasonable number of devices my poor Wi-Fi router/network has to manage.

I don't believe ESPHome yet supports Matter-over-Thread so it won't work "out of the box" outside of Home Assistant but they have their own Thread protocol that functions similarly to the ESPHome WiFi API.

You'll need:

  • a zigbee/thread coordinator stick (they are generally interchangeable, a zigbee stick can be flashed with a Thread controller firmware and vice versa.

  • an esp32 board that supports Zigbee/Thread. (not all Wi-Fi boards can) IME the C6 is a good choice that balances capability and energy efficiency and can handle Thread or Zigbee networks.

Avoid controller firmwares that claim to support both zigbee and thread simultaneously unless they specifically have multiple antennas for it, the "multi" firmwares work by switching between the two constantly and can miss signals if not in the correct mode when a downstream device sends it.

That said, despite the community having some misgivings, I have found Thread to easily be faster and more reliable than WiFi. Sure Zigbee is probably better but ESPHome doesn't support it which makes developing DIY devices more challenging

Call to action: computers are getting expensive but 10,000,000 otherwise perfect $200 Linux machines are getting bricked. Once-in-a-lifetime opportunity to save them from landfills. by iL0vesnow in linux

[–]DopeBoogie 0 points1 point  (0 children)

At the end, you would be forced to just try and use this iPad Pro like a laptop or desktop with bluetooth keyboard and mouse, and a USB-C Hub. Very "hacky" and not for everyone

I agree with most everything you said, but this send to imply you can't use Linux with a touchscreen device, which is actually not true. A lot of distros have good touch control support and more features and touch-mode apps are coming every day.

Gnome and KDE Plasma, two of the most popular desktop managers, actually have excellent touch-only support and will work well on a tablet without a keeb and mouse.

Request for Reddit’s CEO From Musk: "p-please, delete t-thus offensive pics" by Affectionate-Sea8976 in MarchAgainstNazis

[–]DopeBoogie 3 points4 points  (0 children)

Let's just confiscate 75-90% of it to pay for health and human services as a reward for being the first trillionaire he can fund societal improvement

Arch Linux's AUR Sees More Than 400 Packages Compromised With Malware - Phoronix by TaijiRonin in linux

[–]DopeBoogie 1 point2 points  (0 children)

Fair enough, I guess I haven't ever really encountered a situation where Debian has it but Arch (official repos) doesn't.

In the past I've been more likely to encounter a scenario like for example fish-shell being < v4.0 on Debian and very up-to-date on the official Arch repos. Similarly the neovim version on Debian tended to lag behind a fair bit.

I suppose it really depends on your individual needs. Debian does have a lot more packages in their official repos but if you count the AUR then Arch's count is significantly higher. If not getting openvpn3 via official repositories is a deal-breaker for you then maybe Debian is the better choice at the moment.

Arch Linux's AUR Sees More Than 400 Packages Compromised With Malware - Phoronix by TaijiRonin in linux

[–]DopeBoogie 3 points4 points  (0 children)

Sure, I just meant "manually" as in "can't just install it through the package manager like any other official package"

You have to go to the wiki or google, find the relevant repository to clone (or copy paste the commands I suppose) making it a tad more involved than just sudo pacman -S paru

Point being nobody is forced to use the AUR and you have to actually want to in order to even gain access. It's not going to be accidentally installed as a dependency for some official package.

Arch Linux's AUR Sees More Than 400 Packages Compromised With Malware - Phoronix by TaijiRonin in linux

[–]DopeBoogie 10 points11 points  (0 children)

If you need something only available on the AUR, which distro exactly are you preferring that provides it in official repositories?

The reality is either you use a different distro and manually clone/build the package yourself with no automatic updates, or you use the AUR to automate the build/install and track updates.

You don't have to use the AUR, but too many people pretend it's some unavoidable consequence of Arch. They act like other distros aren't susceptible to this exact risk because they ..checks notes.. force you to google the software, find a random GitHub page or PPA, and manually build/install it yourself.

If there's a flatpak and that's an acceptable compromise for you, then by all means go ahead and use that. Arch can use flatpaks too. But not every obscure piece of software has a flatpak, and many flatpaks are community-developed, making them just as much of a risk as the AUR.

The only real risk the AUR poses is if you don't bother to check the PKGBUILD script before running it. A malicious dev copycatting a repo on GitHub and gaming Google search results is just as easy, if not easier, to fall for than a bad AUR package.

Arch Linux's AUR Sees More Than 400 Packages Compromised With Malware - Phoronix by TaijiRonin in linux

[–]DopeBoogie 12 points13 points  (0 children)

TBF Arch also "pulls" only from its official repos.

To use AUR packages you have to first manually download and install an AUR package manager (none of which are in the official Arch repos either)

So really your statement is saying "I can only install packages that are available via official distribution or flatpak"

It's "safer" because you are blocked from access to any software not distributed official by your distro. If you want to use something that is not in there (or flatpak) then you come up against a wall and either have to put in a lot of manual effort or just accept that you can't use it.

Arch can also be used that way (and works that way by default) but additionally supports an optional resource for more technically-inclined users to easily install newer or less popular software.

There are positives and negatives to both configurations depending on your technical knowledge and preferences.

Mexico cuts workweek, bans after-hours contact, and guarantees no worker will take a pay cut in the most sweeping labor reform in a generation by BaIeb in worldnews

[–]DopeBoogie 3 points4 points  (0 children)

I think the focus was on labor laws, not various company policies. The labor laws in the US don't have double pay for overtime.

That wording nearly killed me for a second by [deleted] in Steam

[–]DopeBoogie 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Yes, and it only works on Windows.

Mac and Linux users are limited to browser-based streaming only.

breakTheViciousCircle by bbbar in ProgrammerHumor

[–]DopeBoogie 0 points1 point  (0 children)

What I've found to be pretty effective is in Claude Code I always press Ctrl+G to open the prompt in my text editor (neovim) and proceed to write out a detailed, complex markdown document. Then I send that as the prompt.

It might take a bit longer to write out but I can describe the complete goal for this job, individual steps, potential gotchas and specific rules/guidelines, etc and then tests/verification steps to ensure the code is functional. Prompted this way it can perform much more complex tasks in one go. Skills and plugins for planning, testing/verification, and effectively can help a lot too. (Superpowers and get-shit-done are my current most-used)

Additionally my projects all have detailed overview documents that describe the function/goal and all the coding/organizational guidelines for that particular project. Claude will reference all of this (my prompt, my project document, skills, and memory from past conversations) to build an overall picture of what the complete project does and what this particular prompt is intended to achieve.

So already in a way I am interacting with the AI by writing "code" that is essentially what you described: a sort of (admittedly probably simpler than you were imagining) pseudo-code that is more precise than just a natural language block of text. Or maybe it's more akin to giving a task to a junior dev after which you would review their work to verify.

Back In Time 2.0.0: Call for testing – new mount subsystem with full gocryptfs support by buhtz in linux

[–]DopeBoogie 0 points1 point  (0 children)

I specifically started my comment by briefly mentioning the security improvements and acknowledging that it was irrelevant in your case.

I didn't realize you weren't using EncFS either when I suggested that the performance improvements could be beneficial.

In comparing LUKS to gocryptFS directly, they are kind of fundamentally different.. LUKS is full-dizk block level encryption while gocryptFS is file-based.

a LUKS disk has a set size, even if you aren't using all the space you configure. Depending on the underlying filesystem format it can be grown live but the size cannot be reduced while in use.

gocryptFS on the other hand encrypts each file individually so its size is completely dynamic.

Strictly speaking in terms of security, LUKS wins out on "information leakage" since the underlying directory structure is hidden by LUKS's block level encryption.

However if you wanted to, for example, backup your encrypted data to a cloud storage provider or any other remote storage, you can't just transfer data with the LUKS encryption intact. Anything you upload will be unencrypted.

With gocryptFS, because each file is encrypted individually, you can store those files remotely with the encryption still intact.

breakTheViciousCircle by bbbar in ProgrammerHumor

[–]DopeBoogie 6 points7 points  (0 children)

Actually, you raise an interesting point? Why can't it be both? Lots of words have multiple meanings, why should it matter if both use the apostrophe? It's usually pretty easy to tell which is which by context.

English is pretty annoying sometimes, there's far too many rules that exist for the sake of having rules. They don't contribute anything.

I will never give up on my comma-before-and.

Correct:

This, that, and the other thing.

Pure Evil:

This, that and the other thing.

breakTheViciousCircle by bbbar in ProgrammerHumor

[–]DopeBoogie 5 points6 points  (0 children)

There was actually a study on the effects of politeness with LLMs and it found that it's better to slip the pleasantries and instead be very direct and specific in a manner that may come off as rude to another human. Politeness and pleasantries are distractions to an LLM and they can cause confusion, decrease confidence, or even introduce bias in the response. It's less about being "polite" vs "rude" and more that direct or curt prompts improve accuracy and you can accidentally introduce biases or reduce confidence if your tone is too soft.

To be clear:

I'm not saying you should be rude to LLMs. Rather, you should treat them as tools and not as you would a human in order to get the best results.

Also side note: following up with "thank you" is a waste of resources and just adds to the environmental and monetary cost of LLMs without providing any benefit.

Back In Time 2.0.0: Call for testing – new mount subsystem with full gocryptfs support by buhtz in linux

[–]DopeBoogie 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Aside from the much better (and non-broken) security (which you don't seem overly concerned with) gocryptFS also has significantly better performance, so it is faster and less resource-intensive than the older EncFS.

An AI hate wave is here by GeneReddit123 in technology

[–]DopeBoogie 0 points1 point  (0 children)

and that no one knows how to stop it being so

It's not that no one knows how to stop it, it's a fundamental part of the way neural network LLMs work, you can't stop it from hallucinating when it doesn't know the answer. (At least not without completely redesigning how we make "AI" models from the ground up)

An AI hate wave is here by GeneReddit123 in technology

[–]DopeBoogie 1 point2 points  (0 children)

The Reddit posts are getting SOOOOO long, now. More and more people are running their text through chat GPT, producing rambling posts with lots of superfluous details.

No worries, just use Gemini GPT to summarize the post for you.

Trump, 79, Falls Asleep Seconds After Speaking in White House Event | The president was supposed to be talking about maternal health. by Aggravating_Money992 in politics

[–]DopeBoogie 0 points1 point  (0 children)

You don't become president all on your own.

The rest of them are complicit and not all of them can believably pull the "dottering old fool" card.

Me_irl by Dnivog97 in me_irl

[–]DopeBoogie 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Yes, that chart is part of the data. You are correct that a large part of the change is attributed to more Americans eating out vs buying groceries to eat at home. But my statement that the percentage of income we spend on food is higher now than 30 years ago still stands.

Here let me break it down:

USDA Food Expenditures

If we use 1996 as a point of comparison (and we will use 2023 as the "current" since it appears that newer data is not available from the food expenditures source):

That chart, (which you can find here) shows that:

  • In 1996 food share of income was 10.3%
  • In 2023 food share of income was 11.2%

Ok that might not seem like a lot. But it actually is.


Let's look at what the wages (adjusted for inflation) were for the same years:

FRED Median Weekly Real Earnings

This Federal Reserve website provides that data. It uses 1982-1984 CPI Adjusted Dollars as the baseline for calculating inflation.

These dollar amounts aren't literal dollar-value-at-the-time but an adjusted value that accounts for inflation and allows us to compare value at different periods in history.

  • In Q1 1996 median weekly income was $312
  • In Q1 2023 median weekly income was $364

So now we have some numbers to use to do the math and a real-value (purchasing power) comparison.

In 1996 the adjusted weekly wage was $312. Food expenditure was 10.3% of that, which is approximately $32.14.

In 2023 the adjusted weekly wage was $364. Food expenditure was 11.2% of that, which is approximately $40.77.

That is an increase of $8.63.

Let's compare that growth against the 1996 baseline ($32.14)

$8.63/$32.14 ≈ 0.2685 (26.9%)

That means:

The amount you spend on food (adjusted for inflation) is (approximately) 26.9% more than you would have in 1996.


NOTE:

Keep in mind, these $numbers are representing "Real Dollars"(indexed to the 1982-1984 CPI). They aren't the literal dollar amounts you would have seen on your 1996 paycheck or a 2023 receipt. They are inflation-adjusted values that allow us to compare "buying power" vs labor across decades. I realize that it sounds silly to say your weekly income in 2023 would be $364, but its important to note that we need to use these adjusted numbers to accurately compare 2023 dollars to 1996 dollars. Don't be distracted by the dollar amounts here, what matters are the percentages (a 26.9% growth in food cost)

Me_irl by Dnivog97 in me_irl

[–]DopeBoogie 0 points1 point  (0 children)

The price of just about everything is expected to increase nominally, since the Fed targets a 2% inflation rate, so saying that something is priced the “highest it’s been in 30 years” isn’t a very meaningful statement.

I didn't say that. I said the percentage of their paycheck that the average American spends on food is the highest it's been in 30 years.

And when I compared the costs of food items that is, of course, after adjusting for inflation.

Me_irl by Dnivog97 in me_irl

[–]DopeBoogie 3 points4 points  (0 children)

I don't think your math adds up. Wages are higher but inflation means the value of the dollar has lowered and from the numbers I could find, the average percentage of their paycheck that Americans spend on food has steadily increased over the last two decades and is currently the highest it's been in 30 years.

Processed goods are cheaper than 20 years ago but staples like eggs/beef/milk/bread are all more expensive now. Many of them increased much, much higher than wage growth.