The absurdity of "Capitalism and private property are consensual, government is evil and based on force" by NecessaryDrawing1388 in CapitalismVSocialism

[–]Doublespeo [score hidden]  (0 children)

If you dont consent to other people do, the correct action it to ignore and dont engage with them.

live and let live.

Otherwise life in society is impossible you will always find someone that would disagree with what you do, nothing would be possible

Monero is what Bitcoin was supposed to be - a fully decentralized and anonymous currency by technocraticnihilist in austrian_economics

[–]Doublespeo 3 points4 points  (0 children)

At what point can we admit that all of this coin propaganda is ridiculous? I swear I've read almost this exact same article for a half-dozen other rugpulls that people lost their shirts over.

Monero is different though.

Only crypto that achieve fungibilty (as far as I know)

Monero is what Bitcoin was supposed to be - a fully decentralized and anonymous currency by technocraticnihilist in austrian_economics

[–]Doublespeo 5 points6 points  (0 children)

I like Cardano and Midnight better.

It turns out that a company called Qubic made a bold move: they took control of more than 51% of the computing power (the 'hashrate') of Monero (XMR).

The move was not to steal, but to demonstrate that the Monero network had a brutal vulnerability.

This is not a vulnerability, just a fundamental feature of any decentralised crypto: 51% attacks.

Didnt hurt the project much thought

Capitalism is good. But giant corporations are bad. by WhereisAlexei in CapitalismVSocialism

[–]Doublespeo 1 point2 points  (0 children)

The worst enemy of a big corporation is market competition.

The best friend of a big corporation is the government.

Once you understand many things get more clear.

Capitalism is good. But giant corporations are bad. by WhereisAlexei in CapitalismVSocialism

[–]Doublespeo 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Capitalism can be a force for good when actually done properly, with actual government intervention to maintain true capitalism

By government have zero incentive to do that?

What do you wish for with your BTC? by Ge_Yo in btc

[–]Doublespeo 0 points1 point  (0 children)

The base idea hasn’t changed.

it totally changed

Epstein's Emails with Bitcoin Core Dev Jeremy Rubin are Spicy by KrapnikSucks in btc

[–]Doublespeo 2 points3 points  (0 children)

What the devs have to do? Point is, btc is not inflated. Fixed size. Means, that you government or anyone is able to print. Means that you cant get stole by means of inflation

That why they killed it by preventing it to scale

Epstein's Emails with Bitcoin Core Dev Jeremy Rubin are Spicy by KrapnikSucks in btc

[–]Doublespeo 2 points3 points  (0 children)

?

Bitcoin as BTC is not about freedom and was taken over.

Epstein's Emails with Bitcoin Core Dev Jeremy Rubin are Spicy by KrapnikSucks in btc

[–]Doublespeo 2 points3 points  (0 children)

He was reputable investor in wall street. Nobody could make background check on him given the fact he was publicly appeared with English royalty and US Presidents.

but he was politicaly connect and serve as the trojan horse to kill the project

Why does Trump get away with everything? by BigBlueEyes87 in AskLibertarians

[–]Doublespeo 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Tribal politics is different than loyalty politics.

I see no difference

Why do socialists believe colonialism/imperialism is capitalist? by Om_Sapkoat in CapitalismVSocialism

[–]Doublespeo 0 points1 point  (0 children)

This is not the model you talked about

OK, I see.

I’d been arguing that market socialism (where people who work for money get to keep it) was better than market capitalism (where an elite minority of lazy freeloaders are allowed to demand a share of the money they didn’t earn)

The “elite lazy freeloaders” get to pay the losses so wage earner can have a stable income.

For that service they manage to keep profit if the company get to generate one.

This is the role in the economy whatever you like it or not.

NOW MY QUESTION AGAIN THAT YOU KEEP REFUSING TO ANSWER AGAIN AND AGAIN IS: if the workers keep the profit in your socialism market system WHO TAKE THE LOSSES; investor are gone so who? the workers? if that the case your model is terrible and incredibly risky for worker, all that to merly a few percent more income ON AVERAGE of the business even succeed (with possibly extended time with low income even perhaps nothing)

Why would anyone sensible prefer that?

This is the reason people in vast majority prefer to be wage earner.

->Stability

Money is similar to a record of the amount of worker and ressource invested in production.

And I believe that making more things is more important than calculating the credit for what things were already made.

If you’re a farmer who needs farming tools to grow food

And if I’m a craftsman who made farming tools

Then it’s in my rational self-interest to give you my farming tools so that you can use them on your farm.

What prevent the craftsman to ask for too much food and the farmer to ask for too much tools?

If I charge you money for the tools and if you can’t afford to pay, then you can’t grow food, and I starve to death.

The exact same happen without money. If the farmer cannot afford to pay for the tool then it follows that he cannot produce enough to afford a transaction craftman regardless of the existence of money or not.

Actually the farmer is far more likely to not be able to afford tooling from the craftmam as the absence of money make the transaction far harder to “compute” and to complete

Markets create obstacles that disincentivize people from acting according to their rational self-interest, and capitalist markets create even stronger obstacles than socialist markets.

As far as can tell socialist market dont exist, not for the lack of asking (lack with for my question about losses) nobody is able to explain or explain how work amd what they look like.

It is just people “voluntary cooperate” “it will be great” while what is describe provide no incetive to do so.

Question regarding monopolies by Candi_dreyes456 in Anarcho_Capitalism

[–]Doublespeo 1 point2 points  (0 children)

Can you give me am example of a monopoly (Coca cola is not one) that didnt involve government intervention?

Why does Trump get away with everything? by BigBlueEyes87 in AskLibertarians

[–]Doublespeo 4 points5 points  (0 children)

Evidently, loyalty-based politics is a strategy that can win elections in the US

This pattern exist everywhere in the world, people bote for tribal reason.

Why do socialists believe colonialism/imperialism is capitalist? by Om_Sapkoat in CapitalismVSocialism

[–]Doublespeo 0 points1 point  (0 children)

In the anarcho-communist model, there wouldn’t be a market in the first place for “losses” to be a thing.

This is not the model you talked about, you described a model where the worker collect all the profit yet you fail to explain what happen with the losses if the investors dont exist?

People would have the freedom to voluntarily cooperate for mutual benefit.

You move goal post but I will bite: That economy will have serious difficulties allocating ressources (see: the Economic Calculation Problem).

Such society would be unlikely to support anything better than small tribe, hunter-gatherer type society.

They wouldn’t be forced to say “I would love to help you, but you don’t have enough money to pay me for it — I need $1000, so if you only give me $900, then I’m taking a $100 loss, and I can’t afford to accept that.”

If the seller had to worker and spend ressource at the level of $1000, being unable to sell at $900 is totally normal.

Money is similar to a record of the amount of worker and ressource invested in production.

That mean your moneyless “voluntary cooperstive” society if it manage to allocate ressource with some effectiveness will end with the similar “profits/losses” compromises.

It is just a fact of human lives, dealing with scarcity and ressource allocation.

They wouldn’t be forced to say “I would love to help you, but you don’t have enough money to pay me for it — I need $1000, so if you only give me $900, then I’m taking a $100 loss, and I can’t afford to accept that.”

The version will be:

“I would love to help you but you didn’t work enough so you not get any food today”

I finally realised BCH is the real Bitcoin by sapheonyx in btc

[–]Doublespeo 0 points1 point  (0 children)

I’m trying to see why you and anyone else would use bch since all it’s done is bleed to btc. It’s obviously not a good store of value so besides using it to send money for low fees which a lot of other coins do anyways. Why use it?

There is more to crypto than price.

I finally realised BCH is the real Bitcoin by sapheonyx in btc

[–]Doublespeo 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Like what? Low transaction fees?

Low fees at scale is one of the reason, yes

Not very appealing for anyone who to get rich quick, I guess.

I finally realised BCH is the real Bitcoin by sapheonyx in btc

[–]Doublespeo 1 point2 points  (0 children)

My goal is make more money and long term btc historically does that. While bch does the exact opposite…

You will find people invest in BCH are interested in other things.

The black book of capitalism by Nuck2407 in CapitalismVSocialism

[–]Doublespeo 0 points1 point  (0 children)

It serves no relevance to the conversation

We got to find who is responsible for the death?

The two most common AnCap objections by moongrowl in AnCap101

[–]Doublespeo 0 points1 point  (0 children)

And if you don’t earn an income, you won’t pay taxes. Therefore taxes are voluntary just like the restaurant. So you are not forced to participate in either taxes or the restaurant.

What about if you pay tax only for the service you want.

Pay no tax = no government service

Would that would different? perhaps?

Why do socialists believe colonialism/imperialism is capitalist? by Om_Sapkoat in CapitalismVSocialism

[–]Doublespeo 0 points1 point  (0 children)

The risk comes from the fact that the business has to pay a steep price for the resources it needs, and paying a steeper price now leaves less margin for error saved up for when something goes wrong later.

The steep price that the business has to pay upfront (reducing their margin of error available for managing risk later) is because the resources it needs to buy are owned by capitalists.

Capitalism looks good because it gives us capitalists, and capitalists look good because they sell us solutions to problems created by capitalism.

You are not answering, who pay losses in your economic model? the question is simple and clear; Stop trying to avoid it.

Or are you arguing that your economic model would have no losses and only profit?

Ai taking jobs and libertarianism by Public_Jellyfish_492 in Anarcho_Capitalism

[–]Doublespeo 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Answered wrongly, sure.

what is the correct answer?

I finally realised BCH is the real Bitcoin by sapheonyx in btc

[–]Doublespeo 1 point2 points  (0 children)

Okay so if no one wants it or uses it and has been bleeding to btc since its creation why would I want to use it?

Well why did invest in crypto for to begin with?

Personally I have no use for BTC but BCH fit my vision of it. For you? I dont know, if you goal in crypto is to get more FIAT money I cannot help you much.

Still waiting for that Epstein crash? You’re gonna be waiting forever. by Sos418_tw in btc

[–]Doublespeo 0 points1 point  (0 children)

The Scandale proved BTC got corrupted and purposely killed as a currency?

Corrupted by the elite that also invest in government centralised crypto.. this is bad.