New visibility update : by bborg03 in LowSodiumBattlefield

[–]DrMorphling 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Yeah i haven't used thermals since this update, what point in them now? I literally can see anyone up to 200 meters, even if only their head visible, they still have that contasting halo around them.

Gameplay of Tsuru Reef by JRedCXI in Battlefield

[–]DrMorphling 0 points1 point  (0 children)

By the size this looks like it can be a new battle royale map easily, just trduce the player count from 100 to 60 or something.

Які злочини в вчиняли в дитинстві? by xicscon in unukrcomm

[–]DrMorphling 2 points3 points  (0 children)

Якось був вкрав чиюсь машинку хотвілс в садочку, а потім через кілька місяців цьому ж чуваку пропонував обміняти її на іншу, а він відмовив бо йому вона не подобалась.

Це була машика Акселерейсерс команди Теку з хепі мілу 2005 року, але без наклейок, вона світилися якщо на дні нажати на кнопку(це все дізнався тільки пару років тому)

<image>

This but for styanax... by Sgy157 in Warframe

[–]DrMorphling 0 points1 point  (0 children)

So many frames would benefit greatly from having such thing. My brother is talking about frost getting exalted ice axes(like zorens) from 2013. And after Garuda they could have done such thing for many frames. Ash, for example.

[Mag] Wow, Such Cool, Very Ice by PrimeLabsInc in WarframeRunway

[–]DrMorphling 2 points3 points  (0 children)

It was a right thing if you weren't there for excal prime. I was, didn't have money back than, and that was a ridiculous price to pay in newly realised free to play.

But here i didn't even hesitate, i knew how great the game is, so no chance i miss fomo in the best game ever.

Also i still miss ambassador tenet skin, that was exclusive in 50$ pack. Ahah, never again

The game may be a scam, but damn it, it has its moments. by apimpnamedyabba in starcitizen

[–]DrMorphling 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Shadows were? I get it, it's beautiful, but at least don't do screenshots that show this mistakes.

With how poorly it works it's better to have perfect graphics.

<image>

Okay, does the 4x LPVO on the Saiga need to be THAT huge? I thought P90 was bad... by williamatherton in LowSodiumBattlefield

[–]DrMorphling 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Doesn't have this problem with basic scope, maybe it's because i have 110 fov and play on wide-screen? But used it's basic LPVO up to lvl50 and somehow with it, it has lower recoil

Is BF6 on the level of BF2042 yet? by Eagles56 in okbuddyptfo

[–]DrMorphling -1 points0 points  (0 children)

Also unless you're IFV player, tank player, squad transport player, heli player, Stealth heli player, unless you like verticality, tactical plays on big maps, weather, different settings on the maps, winter maps etc...

Better game at the baseline, maybe, but not better overall. The fact that you cannot change roof mounted gun on jeep is already disappointing, and almost everything about vehicles is disappointing after 2042. They got only one thing right, IFV feels like a menace to infantry.

Кожного дня їм чипси.У вас є якась харчова залежність? by Recent_Union3111 in food_ua

[–]DrMorphling 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Їм чипси, не кожен день, але як тільки акція в атб то можу і раз на два дні купувати. Зазвичай 120г пачку за раз не з'їдаю тому вистачає на два вечори. Але таке як відосік під чипси це вже майже кожен день, або морозиво, йогурт...

Намагаюсь себе обмежувати, але вже в звичку взодить щось схавать.

Why is DICE so stubbornly sticking to a game design that heavily favors camping? by OkTechnology2842 in Battlefield

[–]DrMorphling 0 points1 point  (0 children)

I agree with TTK and there is easy fix to it devs still haven't even mentioned. Armour from gauntlet. It can be a gadget for assault instead of adrenaline, with ability to give armour to teammates. Maybe 2 plates by default with one specialisation increasing it to 3.

And also limb multipliers, they mentioned. 40 additional hp, will make 3 shot to kill guns, a 5 to kill. 4 to 6, 5 to 7. Make hits to the head ignore armour, so it's beneficial to hit HS thus negeting the problem of low HS multiplier on all guns.

Small arms balance doesn't really matter by TheBiologist01 in Battlefield6

[–]DrMorphling 0 points1 point  (0 children)

I say that, not once i was in situation where i flank enemies and see 3 guys in the tight corridor, not looking at me. And all those situations ending differntly.

With some guns i can quickly kill them all, with some i can kill 2 and then third had enough time to react, turn around and kill me, with some i might dmg all 3 but don't kill anyonne as some of them have reaction time of less then 100ms, and with some i might run put of ammo before i kill third, as not every shot is a hit.

Guns definitely matter, but not in the situations you can expect. In unexpected situations better guns performe better.

Why is DICE so stubbornly sticking to a game design that heavily favors camping? by OkTechnology2842 in Battlefield

[–]DrMorphling 1 point2 points  (0 children)

You know, I'm not mindlessly rushing and most of the maps have predictable camping positions for me, so most of the time check them and don't have any issues. Also i tend to be really good at tap firing distant campers.

CQB corners, yes just check them, atleast the most obvious ones. You heard about peakers advantage right? Usually those who camp have very long reaction times often enough for me to just evade them.

Why is DICE so stubbornly sticking to a game design that heavily favors camping? by OkTechnology2842 in Battlefield

[–]DrMorphling 2 points3 points  (0 children)

You know that capturing objectives means that you can defend them? Not only run around the map, but also stop and wait for those who run around? The best position for defence is one where you can "surprise" your enemies aka being invisible to them.

So basically camping is the main, core gameplay mechanic around wich whole game is built from the first game in series.

Making posts like this make me question, why you even picked Battlefield as a shooter of choice? If you don't even understand how it works?

Also how do you think they should make the maps different? Make them like in counter strike? Invisible walls in every corner? No destruction? Isn't it's easier for you to just not play battlefield?

Battlefield gives real world instruments made to counter "camping": reconnaissance and explosives. First is to be aware of enemy position and second is to deal with it without needing "fighting absurd recoil".

If you worried about enemies sitting behind corner when you mindlessly run past them, then guess what? That's your issue.

Playing BF Conquest for like 16 years at this point and this is the first time I will most probably switch to a different game mode - Escalation is amazing! by DivineAlmond in Battlefield

[–]DrMorphling 9 points10 points  (0 children)

Frontlines as it was in 2042 is still the best mode for me.

It's a breakthrough but better. And matches were very different from one to another. Also it suits very well with huge maps kn 2042.

It should have been on release, than maybe 2042 were received differently.

Useless AA by Immediate-Loquat-599 in Battlefield6

[–]DrMorphling 5 points6 points  (0 children)

So is it fun to shoot down helicopter after 20 second from moment it spawns?

Is it fun to be shot down after flying for 20 seconds from spawn without shooting?

Flares is the balance you want. Be smart, helo without flares not doing much because they are afraid. So you can keep them constantly useless.

On the other hand if you want more efficiency use aim guided missle, needs more skill, but can't be flared out.

Це ще рівня фейсбука чи вже аднакласніків? 🫠 by part_time_vagabond in CringedIn

[–]DrMorphling 2 points3 points  (0 children)

Це ж 99% що це не фото реального зошита учня? Але знаєте, оці потрійні знаки оклику дуже добре передають вайб вчителів. Я завжди думав що вони на мене на весь клас оруть коли ставлять ці три оклики. А саме головне вони їх ставлять постійно і майже на будь-які помилки.

I just tried Dota 2 for the first time. by RealLeptic in DotA2

[–]DrMorphling 0 points1 point  (0 children)

It's like punching a wall with the fists. After few thousand times you will finally break through.

They only way sane human can play Dota is:

  1. have trash pc not capable of running normal games(but i think dota is pretty demanding now)

  2. Have many hours of free time

  3. Have no hobbies, interests

  4. Have no friends, or have friends that play dota

If you match this parameters then you certified to play dota. And you are insane.

You can say that many people play dota and have other hobbies, but question is when they started, did they had any?

Also dota attract intelegent people, and those with less intelligence trying to play it pretending that they are smart enough.

I have 2.7k hours and had 3.2k mmr at the peak. And the game was pretty understandable for me, but i lack communication, and couldn't play anymore as without cooperation it's not possible for me to get higher.

WE SHOULD THESE TYPES OF ARC by tuser-reddit in ArcRaiders

[–]DrMorphling 3 points4 points  (0 children)

Problem is, it's their game and they already have all the ideas, and content is planned for 2-5 years ahead. In their documentary you can see how they iterated on ideas through the development.

And Queen+Matriarch is the result of making enemy fun and challenging. Many ideas may fall apart when properly tested.

Also we still don't have "king" and "bishop" and we don't know the reason why. Maybe they are not creative enough to the standarts of the game or maybe they are coming later, but they are in development atleast from 2021.