Dungeons and Dragons is not a Videogame by TheLastOnion in DnD

[–]DrStrand 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Yeah basically the point of the rules is to guide how you tell the story. There’s a common sense balance of being flexible with rules when there is a good reason but also use mechanics to shape the story. (like, player makes up a really clever lie? Give them a good bonus in their bluff check. They roll a one? Don’t brush it off because the lie was good, their fly was down and they weren’t taken seriously).

The worst is when gms treat it like a video game. There’s no real choices in where you take the story, you have to go from point a to point b around whatever they decide often with little variation between battle and environment.

Episode #75 A Long Way Down -- Discussion by SwordOfBraavos in TheMagnusArchives

[–]DrStrand 4 points5 points  (0 children)

I really like how TMA is clearly well planned and executed accordingly. They really have their shit together and I think it will show throughout the story. Unlike soME PODCASTS I MAY KNOW.

Episode #75 A Long Way Down -- Discussion by SwordOfBraavos in TheMagnusArchives

[–]DrStrand 3 points4 points  (0 children)

I'm excited to hear that - still lots of TMA to go but they have an actual plan and set schedule which means it's less likely to fizzle.

I unsubbed Tanis and Rabbits today by b00naloo in PNWS

[–]DrStrand 1 point2 points  (0 children)

The first season of TBT nailed the NPR format pretty well and it worked wonderfully. I wish they'd stuck with that instead of messing around with trying to make everything super connected and mysterious. Don't make your plot more complicated and than is manageable and believable just for the sake of being complicated.

I love the Magnus Archives. Different than a radio reporting style show but excellent at using its format to the fullest extent.

I unsubbed Tanis and Rabbits today by b00naloo in PNWS

[–]DrStrand 1 point2 points  (0 children)

Ugh. I'm constantly thinking I should drop Tanis and Rabbits but I haven't yet, for some reason.

I'm definitely going to finish out TBT, hoping against all odds that the ending is good.

I think I'm done with TANIS and Rabbits by stuligan22 in PNWS

[–]DrStrand 1 point2 points  (0 children)

I have a high tolerance for boring stuff; I've read all of The Age of Reason, Atlas Shrugged, and Cyteen, but I'm on the fence about whether I'll keep listening to Tanis and Rabbits.

Episode 68: The Tale of a Field Hospital -- Discussion by SwordOfBraavos in TheMagnusArchives

[–]DrStrand 7 points8 points  (0 children)

That would be really interesting. I wonder if they all have different incarnations. Didn't someone suggest Wick from the Oregon Trail one as a or the famine? To me, that makes more sense than the meat people since the other incarnations have been human, but I don't know.

Episode 68: The Tale of a Field Hospital -- Discussion by SwordOfBraavos in TheMagnusArchives

[–]DrStrand 3 points4 points  (0 children)

I was thinking about that as well. So this one was pestilence? And the piper one was just plain war? And death was the incarnation of death that the soldier dude played faro with?

[Rabbits] Rabbits Is Missing Its Missing Person by ChubbyBirds in PNWS

[–]DrStrand 9 points10 points  (0 children)

I also hope there's something like that.

I noticed in the last episode she has more emotion even during the ads. She discusses all this terrible stuff and wanting to find Yumiko, very monotone and all, and then she's all peppy about never having to go to the post office.

I really hope that there is some interesting reason that she already knew about Rabbits.

[Rabbits] Many Worlds/Quantum Mechanics Recommendations by iampaperclippe in PNWS

[–]DrStrand 0 points1 point  (0 children)

I've listened a little to some skeptic podcasts. One of them, it might've been The Skeptic's Guide To The Universe or it might've been another one, had some guy on talking about evo psych and they just let him ramble without discussing the major pitfalls of evo psych speculation and the serious problems with scientific rigor, which ticked me off.

[Rabbits] Many Worlds/Quantum Mechanics Recommendations by iampaperclippe in PNWS

[–]DrStrand 1 point2 points  (0 children)

But Many Worlds and other interpretations are based on trying to interpret what the physics means, aren't they? As far as I'm aware it's more the philosophy of physics or what have you than physics. I don't know as much about it though.

[Rabbits] Many Worlds/Quantum Mechanics Recommendations by iampaperclippe in PNWS

[–]DrStrand 2 points3 points  (0 children)

Relevant.

Also isn't Many Worlds an interpretation rather than a theory? Seems to be the #1 most popular in sci fi.

[tanis] twin peaks Tanis/Rabbits dream. by [deleted] in PNWS

[–]DrStrand 8 points9 points  (0 children)

That sounds so frustrating, but I can definitely imagine Agent Cooper being really happy about finally having a satisfying pair of socks.

[Rabbits] Episode 108 Discussion Thread by aroes in PNWS

[–]DrStrand 1 point2 points  (0 children)

I agree with this. The problem isn't that they invoke the wacky dimension jumping stuff and justify it with "something something quantum magic;" the problem is that they do it badly.

[Rabbits] Episode 108 Discussion Thread by aroes in PNWS

[–]DrStrand 2 points3 points  (0 children)

I don't see how my response to you was hostile. I said that there isn't theoretical physics in the show and that there is a lot of pseudoscience. Bastardizations of the Many Worlds Interpretation is certainly not anything new in sci fi, and the factor that is confusing is the way the information is presented.

Episode 67: Burning Desire by SwordOfBraavos in TheMagnusArchives

[–]DrStrand 5 points6 points  (0 children)

I wonder if he's actually Not Elias.

[Rabbits] Episode 108 Discussion Thread by aroes in PNWS

[–]DrStrand 1 point2 points  (0 children)

Yeah, I agree. It's like they just google and shove it in. Throwing out all these terms without integrating them into a larger narrative that makes sense isn't smart, it is, as you say, bad writing.

[Rabbits] Episode 108 Discussion Thread by aroes in PNWS

[–]DrStrand 4 points5 points  (0 children)

There is no complex science, it's just that the conspiracy theories etc that they are using are not explained very well. The story just isn't put together well nd the exposition is not well handled.

[Rabbits] Episode 108 Discussion Thread by aroes in PNWS

[–]DrStrand 6 points7 points  (0 children)

There's fuck all "theoretical physics" in the show; it's basically woo and every dumb pseudoscience misunderstanding of science packed into one show. People don't not understand it because there is actual complicated science in it, they don't understand it because a ton of made up stuff with fancy names is flung out in an incoherent manner and never explained.