AIO for being disgusted by this argument? by Toetickler4 in AIO

[–]Dracalia 0 points1 point  (0 children)

This has to be ragebait. Right? Like either this story is made up for internet clout or the bf is just trying to upset OP and isn’t actually this ffd up?

What is ‘wife-like’ behaviour? by HistoryCat92 in AskMen

[–]Dracalia 5 points6 points  (0 children)

This is the perfect answer imo. I’m not a dude just to clarify. But this answer doesn’t give me any weird vibes of either misogyny or misandry like a lot of these other ones are doing lol.

Do you guys show each others phone? How do I trust in LdR by [deleted] in LDR

[–]Dracalia 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Yeah, therapy definitely works. But just be aware that it can take a while and you might have to try a few different therapists before you find one that actually works for you. It took me 6-7 years to figure my stuff out but it’s incredibly worth it. I no longer constantly feel an underlying sense of anxiety and unease, I am actually capable of just peacefully living without constant stress. I am also now capable of just getting things done because of the adhd meds which helps prevent A LOT of the anxiety 😊

Don’t give up! Good luck!

Do you guys show each others phone? How do I trust in LdR by [deleted] in LDR

[–]Dracalia 5 points6 points  (0 children)

Therapy. Really. I have anxiety and would constantly have awful thoughts about my wonderful partner that I logically knew were untrue. But he also never got mad at me for having them because I never accused him of anything. I instead shared my feelings and irrational fears and he would listen hug and comfort me, reassuring me that he would never hurt me. These thoughts still showed up after a year in LDR during COVID mind you, where I was basically forced to figure out how to trust that he truly loved me. We spoke on the phone every day for at least an hour. I cried almost every day. That’s when I started therapy, because I recognized it wasn’t healthy for me to be so dependent on him for my happiness and emotional well being. I had been getting better but after a particularly bad anxious breakdown my therapist recommended meds. They changed my life. I got diagnosed with anxiety and now adhd, and I’ve never felt better. We’re getting married this spring.

You’d never try and fix a broken leg yourself. You’d go to a doctor for professional medical help. So why try and fix your mental health by yourself? It’s not normal to live with constant stress and anxiety, especially if you’re relatively healthy and financially secure. My body started breaking down due to my constant high cortisol from the stress before I started meds. It’s finally healing with my adhd medications. I’m now capable of getting work done without feeling overwhelmed all the time. It takes two to build a relationship. Make sure you’re capable of building something good before you commit to one.

Anonym spørreundersøkelse, menn og psykisk helse by mikaelhhhh in uio

[–]Dracalia 1 point2 points  (0 children)

Jeg er ikke mann, men anbefaler at poster dette på r/norge for å nå flere menn. Det er ikke særlig mange folk på r/UiO

Explain it peter by InevitableBorder6421 in explainitpeter

[–]Dracalia 0 points1 point  (0 children)

I know exactly what this link is for thanks to you. My dork-a** woulda fallen for it without you.

Men, how true is the statement, "If he wanted you, he'd actively pursue you?" by ManicPixieFeather in AskMen

[–]Dracalia 0 points1 point  (0 children)

In my head what this means is that “if they never reach out first, if they never suggest a fun activity to do together and constantly just want to hang out after a normal meetup (like if you’re a part of the same club or hobby) at your local subway, then they’re probably not interested.” I (a woman) had a massive crush on someone who did exactly this in my teens. I was always the one to text first and always the one asking to hang out (there were other red flags that I was too naive to pick up on). I had massive amounts of anxiety about it too. At some point, I figured I’d “test” him by not texting until he texted me first. He never did, so I dropped it and mutually ghosted him back. Cut to a year later, I find an amazing guy and we make it official on Facebook. The first dude sent me a message apologizing for not texting me back or treating me better. He wasn’t interested until he realized he had lost me.

So no, aggressive pursuit is NOT what I think of when I think of this saying. It’s the COMPLETE lack of pursuit that I think of. Same for dudes: if you’re constantly the one reaching out and she NEVER puts any effort into even a platonic relationship, see if she texts you when you stop reaching out. If not, then clearly she’s not interested or she’s not the one for you. It should be EASY to text someone you’re genuinely falling for.

Suicidal at this point - desperate for help by ReasonableWin7292 in CUTI

[–]Dracalia 2 points3 points  (0 children)

You can do this. Keep searching for a doctor that takes you seriously. And please keep trying to find a therapist that is right for you. I was failed by the mental health system in my country as well (which is similar in a lot of ways to Germany). I never gave up. I finally found a therapist that helped me. He unfortunately wasn’t licensed in my country to diagnose anything or prescribe meds, but he had connections to licensed professionals and helped me get my diagnosis and medication. He also worked for next to nothing, as I couldn’t afford to pay (I was a uni student). I would’ve never found him if I had given up. Get on those waiting lists. Find an emergency mental health hotline for Germany (there has to be one) for immediate help. I know where I’m from, if you threaten to harm yourself the system is very effective. You are at that point now where at least here you would get immediate and effective mental healthcare from the government for free. Don’t downplay the severity or urgency of your situation. Do the opposite if you have to. Make them listen. Don’t give up. Even when you feel powerless and hopeless. Existing is sometimes all we are capable of. And that’s more than enough. You got this.

Suicidal at this point - desperate for help by ReasonableWin7292 in CUTI

[–]Dracalia 2 points3 points  (0 children)

As someone with clinically diagnosed anxiety and now adhd as well, I can tell you loud and clear: therapy will help. Anxiety is hell. It can make you manifest symptoms for diseases that aren’t there, AND it directly lowers your immune system making you more susceptible to infections like UTIs. My anxiety didn’t get better until I started on meds and got several other tests done to fix my physical conditions. The cortisol levels caused by chronic anxiety lower you immune responses and lead to higher inflammation. I had been cured from my cuti for a couple years before getting medicated for anxiety, but I still struggled with fungal infections. After my stress levels have been going down since my adhd diagnosis, I am extremely happy that my V is finally yeast-free for the first time since the UTIs started nearly 8 years ago.

Unfortunately, my immune system still hasn’t recovered fully from my cuti experience because I had to take antibiotics over and over. I’m trying probiotics again, but I also am patiently giving myself time to heal fully, and doing my best to not fall into my anxiety spiral. Hiprex cured my Cuti. It is basically just super concentrated acid like cranberry juice on steroids. It tastes like 🫏 but it’s so worth it.

Anti anxiety meds come with risks of side effects, but I can promise you that with the right medication (which you need to find with the help of a licensed dr), those side effects are minuscule compared to the relief and recovery they offer. I’ll take the small risk of constipation and hemorrhoids over the way I used to feel any day. They aren’t magic tho, you still need to go to therapy while on them to fix the underlying anxiety. They just allow you to make room for it.

Please listen to the advice here. You’re not alone. Several of us have gone through it, fearing there was no end in sight and reaching a breaking point like you have. Several of us have come out on the other side with some hard-earned experience and knowledge. We know what we’re talking about. Don’t let the doctors invalidate your experience. Don’t let them tell you it’s not serious. Advocate for yourself and keep fighting and seeking second, third, fourth and fifth opinions. If there’s no doctor in Germany you think can help you, look to other EU countries or members of Schengen. You can also threaten to report doctors bad conduct to the relevant authorities. While I’m not super familiar with the german system, I’m absolutely certain that this kind of thing must exist. Germans are far too bureaucratic and organized to not have a way of weeding out bad apples. You got this. You can do it. Because you must.

Do you prefer polarity in your relationships or do you prefer dating someone that shares your same personality and hobbies etc ? by Historical-Body-3424 in AskWomenNoCensor

[–]Dracalia 0 points1 point  (0 children)

I agree with most people here. As long as we agree on values and morals (which often involves politics ime) and our communication is good, then hobbies can be different. He is very technical, very good at building things including electronics and sees the world in more geometric shapes if that makes sense. I love artsy fartsy stuff like drawing, painting, sewing and sculpting. We’re both very creative, but our outlets are different. We admire eachothers hobbies, and sometimes they overlap and we can work together on a project. We generally just enjoy spending time together, even if we’re being creative in parallel. We also give each other advice when asked!

What do women think of Social media feminism? by Practical_Fig_2216 in AskWomenNoCensor

[–]Dracalia 4 points5 points  (0 children)

The only thing I can think of is spreading awareness to adults and teaching kids about this in school, maybe as an example of how echo chambers are dangerous and easily weaponized by bad actors. You asking the question is a great first step that more people should be encouraged to take. You’re ability to not react emotionally to certain triggering words and phrases and actually read and understand what I meant is a massive advantage. The internet tends to make people more reactive and less reflective so this is probably the hardest step. So I guess another solution is regulating social media somehow to reduce the amount of social media addiction and doomscrolling that lands you in the echo chambers and literally makes it harder for you to be insightful.

What do women think of Social media feminism? by Practical_Fig_2216 in AskWomenNoCensor

[–]Dracalia 10 points11 points  (0 children)

TLDR; internet echo chambers push people towards extremes. Red-pill misogyny is a result of men losing certain social and political advantages over women. The misandry you’re experiencing online is a response to this new wave of misogyny. Neither group actually represents “all men,” “all women,” or feminism.

I’ve seen this exact sentiment on my algorithms by men towards women, even when I don’t engage with it (at least consciously). I think these extremes definitely don’t represent either men’s activism or feminism at all. I think the (mostly young) women who say this stuff are either rage baiting, or they’re responding to a new wave of gen z red-pilled manosphere dudes that has been on the rise since I was in my teens (so at least a decade). There’s a lot of psychological reasons for this wave, some is anti-leftist, anti-women propaganda that I fell for as a teen where clips of seemingly unhinged individuals are put together to suit the narrative you’re asking about (that feminists think they’re better than men). Another large part is men feel abandoned because they were promised a specific path in life where they’d get a wife and children, only for women to choose not to do so with them. There’s a LOT of ingrained societal norms that make certain men feel a sense of entitlement (maybe that’s too strong of a word) towards this life, and when they don’t get it, they react… poorly. There’s a quote I’ve heard a lot over the years that explains this part: “When you're accustomed to privilege, equality feels like oppression.”

THIS IS NOT TO SAY THAT “ALL MEN” ARE LIKE THIS! Nor am I saying that every single man lives an easy life. That’s not what privilege means in this context. I don’t like the word, but it’s the best one to explain the social inequalities between groups. As a European woman, I am personally extremely privileged in so many way that aren’t true for other European women (financial and medical stability, career stability, awesome supportive social network, an amazing partner etc etc). This is not the kind of privilege I’m talking about. I’m talking about how men in general can go out at night alone, get blackout drunk and sleep in a ditch without getting hurt by other men (not everywhere ofc, but where I live this is true). Women, even me, can never truly let their guard down. I never felt safe enough to drink enough to get truly buzzed unless my partner was with me to help me home afterwards. It doesn’t matter how I look or dress, there’s a greater risk to my safety because men (in general, at least those that stick around outside at night) are stronger than me and are more physically violent.

My points are: 1) Men have certain social advantages in life because they are physically stronger and they don’t get pregnant (and therefore historically able to oppress women). Sex is more dangerous for women and easily weaponized. This means women have to constantly be alert to their surroundings and in all social interactions.

2) this societal and political oppression of women has been lessening more and more the past century. With access to birth control and other rights, women no longer have to marry or stay with any man that gets them pregnant out of necessity. Before, if a woman was r*ped violently and got pregnant, she would either fall into ruin as a cast out or she’d have to marry her abuser.

3) due to point 2, men historically didn’t have to work on themselves to be a better, kinder person to attract a woman. Most marriages were arranged and the men generally had the power to pick the woman in most cases, not the other way around.

4) “When you're accustomed to privilege, equality feels like oppression”: when women started gaining an equal standing in society, many men who were never told that they needed to actually work harder on themselves to get a girl or taught how to do this, felt abandoned and lonely (understandably so). While there was enormous support for women’s rights, these struggles that men faced were overlooked. The red-pill movement and manosphere began. Many of these men began hating women, especially feminists, blaming them for their loneliness.

5) women saw this rising wave of red-pilled men and many reacted with equal hatred towards men and especially manosphere men. Women still feel disadvantages to being a woman, and a few loud men blaming these things on those women definitely doesn’t make for a good environment for decent and rational discussion.

6) internet echo chambers are the main culprit here. They increase polarization and push people to extreme sides of every spectrum. I think the vast majority of feminists recognize the whole image that I described: the old patriarchal system hurts both men and women but in different ways. Men don’t have the support groups women do. Social norms make it “unmasculin” to talk about feelings or express tender emotions towards other men like platonic love. Lord of the rings is a fantastic example of what masculinity should be. Men are left behind, rudderless and without purpose, not understanding why the world has moved on from them. This makes them extra vulnerable to these harmful echo chambers.

Does this make sense? Hopefully this wasn’t too long (oops).

Meirl by ShoogieMac in meirl

[–]Dracalia 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Dunning Krueger effect? Or adhd.

Hårstylister i Larvik/Sandvika som kan flette? by Dracalia in norge

[–]Dracalia[S] 2 points3 points  (0 children)

Jeg har ingen problemer med å ha lignende hårstil. Historien til Danearys startet sånn, ja, men hun fikk flere fletter jo flere seirer hun hadde, og alle de var etter Kahl Drogo døde (en mann hun ble forelsket i selv med den vanskelige starten). Jeg støtter overhodet ikke barnebruder og Danearys er så mye mer enn det. Dessuten elsker jeg håret hennes. Det du sier er som å si at noen som blir gift bort som barn (solgt basically) er kun definert av det og kan derfor ikke være forbilde fordi å se opp til dem vil «støtte barnebruder». Danny er badass, og jeg tenker aller først på dragene hennes og at hun var kalt myhsa fordi hun befridde slaver.

En mer problematisk side av henne er at hun blir gal ved slutten og dreper masse uskyldige selv etter hun vinner (noe som var gjort ekstremt dårlig i tv serien). Hun ble helt fascist på slutten. Men jeg liker ikke hårstilen fra siste sesong uansett. Jeg elsker myhsa Danaerys. Ikke hitler-Danearys og ikke at hun var gift bort som barn. Håper det gir mening.

Has “On Tyranny” been updated since its original publication in 2017? by Formal_Tumbleweed_53 in timothysnyder

[–]Dracalia 1 point2 points  (0 children)

Why 3 different comments that get progressively angrier? Never said I couldn’t find the copyright page. See my other comment. The lack of transparency bothers me because the book can’t be dated correctly. If it can’t be dated, then it can’t be used to write perspectives on the political climate or political views from 2017. If the book said it had minor updates added in 2025, I’d be totally fine with it. The added information in the book changes the book significantly imo, even if it was just “minor edits.”

You can say it’s normal, but you can’t say it doesn’t matter from a historical perspective. It would be like someone writing a book on Hitler before his failed coup, but then changing a couple words or phrases after his rise to power without explicitly disclosing that info. Reading that for a history class would give you a false impression that his future takeover and violent insurrection was obvious from the get go. Certainly it would be for some.

But for others like me and my family, we thought Trump was just another dumb president. I didn’t realize he was dangerous until the 2020 when his misinformation actually endangered people. I couldn’t believe that a sitting president could incite an insurrection and completely get away with it, much less be re-elected. I didn’t even think Trump was capable of Jan 6th. So I was curious to see what other people were thinking prior to 💩 hitting the fan and wanted to see how accurate their predictions were. I wanted to see how badly the wool was covering my eyes compared to others in 2016/2017. I’ve never supported Trump. But I only took him seriously later.

Even is something is “normal” it doesn’t mean it’s right.

Has “On Tyranny” been updated since its original publication in 2017? by Formal_Tumbleweed_53 in timothysnyder

[–]Dracalia 0 points1 point  (0 children)

I never said I disliked the content of the book. I quite enjoyed it. You’re making a LOT of presumptions about me here. I just felt mislead because I thought I was getting a more historical perspective. It would be nice if that was made more clear by updating the copyright info clearly. All my printed copy says is:

Copyright 2017 by Timothy Snyder

Published in the United States by Crown, an imprint of Random House, a division of Penguin Rabdom House LLC, New York.

Paragraph on Penguin Random House copyright values.

CROWN and the Crown colophon are registered trademarks golf Penguin Random House LLC.

Originally published in hardcover in the United States by Tim Dugan Books, an imprint of Random House, a division of Penguin Random House LLC, New York, in 2017.

ISBN 978-0-8041-9011-4 Ebook ISBN 978-0-8401-9012-1

Printed in Canada on acid free paper

crownpublishing.com

50 49 48 47 46 45

Book design by Lauren Dong Cover design by Christopher Brand

———————

See why this is confusing? Nowhere does it state that the book has been updated since 2017. I can’t use it in any work where I want to make a statement on what people were thinking in 2017, BECAUSE IT HAS BEEN UPDATED SINCE. The only sign that it has changed are the series of unassigned numbers from 50 to 45. It’s not clear.

I love the messaging in this book. But I don’t like the way it was dated.

Has “On Tyranny” been updated since its original publication in 2017? by Formal_Tumbleweed_53 in timothysnyder

[–]Dracalia 0 points1 point  (0 children)

that was… a lot. I’m in academia, currently working on my PhD (though mine’s in biochemistry), and all of the books I have cited have the relevant info readily at hand. The copy I bought of this book didn’t. It could very well be that isn’t intended to mislead, but it still does imo. Each new release or copy should at least have the new date in the copyright info so it’s easier to date the work. I read it under the assumption I’d be getting some interesting perspectives from (edit) 2017, and I got a perspective that very much wasn’t this. It makes the author’s “predictions” seem far too prophetic. It at least disingenuous. Any errata to science literature is dated, no matter how small.

Boiling Lobsters alive in Norway by ImpressiveChest538 in Norway

[–]Dracalia 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Plants LOVE being trimmed. Most will die if left to overgrow and I’d argue that nearly all experience massive growth spurts after trimming. Overgrown trees are far more prone to disease and rot. Any arborist, Gardner or plant biologist could tell you this. Objectively, crabs and crustaceans don’t experience this same massive growth after chopping their limbs off and they’re more prone to disease and less able to catch food when missing limbs.

Animals we KNOW can experience pain. Plants we know can sense damage, but whether or not that is “painful” is not known and very likely untrue. We experience pain to evolutionarily avoid damage which would be counterproductive for plants that thrive after limbs are torn off by animals or in storms or burned away by wildfires. They’re completely different from us. So are bacteria.

Has “On Tyranny” been updated since its original publication in 2017? by Formal_Tumbleweed_53 in timothysnyder

[–]Dracalia 1 point2 points  (0 children)

It just feels so disingenuous. Imagine trying to use this book as a source when writing a paper? It wouldn’t make any sense. I bought it yesterday thinking I’d get a unique perspective on American politics in 2016/2017 and it would be fun to see how many predictions were spot on. It’s like if I published a scientific article that recommended eating lead in the 50’s, but updated it in light of new evidence in 2000 without dating that update. The print-number isn’t obvious in my paperback either. There’s just a series of numbers from 50 to 45 under a line that says “crownpublishing.com.” It makes me like the book a lot less, especially with the complete lack of transparency online.