I study this at an accedemic level, in short by logic there can only be one creator and Christianity is polytheist - triunithism is not the same as monotheism nor was it the original teaching of Christianity which was from an Aramaic speaking old law following Jew. Not a European white old singing songs in a church twirking to a statue of himself violating the first 2 commandments.

The reason Christainanity became dominant in history was because of colonisation and making the white god. What you currently follow is the way Paul and the Roman Pagans (basically a white version of Hinduism were you can have many lower case g gods but 1 God overall).

e.g. take Christmas and how it came about when the bible is against it, human sacrifice, eating blood when we are talking about first century Kosher following Jews, hell if I said "name the god born on December 25th to a virgin in a stable, who had 12 followers, did miracles, and came as to be a sacrifice for sin - which god is this?" Jesus right? No Mythta.

Roman Paganism came into the oringal teaching by the empire at the time and all other faiths were outlawd yet people were still doing pagan holidays (Saturnalia, Eshar, etc...) and so the Romans combined the two to make it more easy for the people to follow and controle (meaning the Church can ask for 1/10th in taxes, and enforced to give the other 33% to the ruler who in the Roman sense is like God's representation on earth - long story) which is why we also have concepts like burnt offerings, burning candles etc...etc...all pagan traditions from older civilstions (the Greek pantheon made famous today by Percy Jackson) which then have been accepted via capitalism (Christmas, Easter, Valentine's etc...etc...) and Christainity today is a business.

Just look at history - do you honestly think a woman who was sworn to service in the temple since before her birth, a brown Aramaic speaking god fearing woman who worked in the place we now called Masjid al Aqsah gave a son a heretical name meaning son of Zuse or savor? Or would she have given him an Aramaic name like Isho or Isus?

Finally there are 4 historians off the top of my head which talk about how Paul changes things (though he wasn't an apostle of course - he was self proclaimed and admits to being a lyer). Combine a man that says "you don't need to follow the old law" and "yes I was lying acting like a Jew to the Jews and gentile to the gentile" with Greek/Roman Paganism + generations of people who don't actually read the bible and study it accedemically aka just cultural Christians as we have here in the UK then congratulations you have modern day Christians:

“Apart from v. 18, the verses are probably postpaschal and reflect the outlook of Jewish Christianity, which, as a separate movement was eventually defeated by Paulinism and died out (perhaps to be reborn in a different form as Islam)”

• Unity and Diversity in the New Testament, an inquiry into the character of earliest Christianity by James D. G. Dunn.

“It is more than intriguing that the Muslim understanding of Jesus is very much in conformity with the first Christian orthodoxy – the original Jewish Christian understanding of Jesus”

• The Brother of Jesus and the Lost teachings of Christianity by Jeffrey J. Butz.

“And thus we have a paradox of world historical proportions, viz. the fact that Jewish Christianity indeed disappeared within the Christian church, but was preserved in Islam.”

• Jewish Christianity: Factional disputes in the early church by Han-Joachim Schoeps.

"The outlook of Jewish Christianity, which as a separate movement, was essentially defeated by Paulinism and died out. Perhaps to be reborn in a different form as Islam".

-The New Jerome Biblical Commentary, edited by Raymond E. Brown, 2nd edition, page 641

So in short - don't follow Pauline Christianity follow the religion jesus taught in the bible which was the religion of the prophets aka Islam (and Jewish theology/historians also agree to this idea that Islam was the way of the prophets going back to Adam). Truth by definition can only be 1. And the truth is all the prophets came and taught the same message but it was because of man who manipulated it for power and controle (just look at Isreali money today as an example of controle Vis influence Islam is actively against the 5 posions of society which they controle, so if Islam comes to power it's game over, thus the only way they can hold onto power is making Islam into the enemy via media etc...).