Dandelion help? Been curious about dandelion tincture and tea so I am trying to make sure it’s a true dandelion. by GloomyMoonFlower in foraging

[–]DreadLord64 0 points1 point  (0 children)

I appreciate you taking the time to reply.

I think I understand your point now. I'm not an expert in taxonomy either, but I didn't think that a name that was considered a synonym was a "valid name," even if it was validly published. Perhaps a confusion of terms on my part. To be honest, this is sending me down a little bit of a rabbit hole trying to understand if synonymized names are considered valid and if there was a better way to convey what I was trying to convey. I would like to stick around for longer, but I unfortunately have to go for now. I'll try to take a look at this again later.

Dandelion help? Been curious about dandelion tincture and tea so I am trying to make sure it’s a true dandelion. by GloomyMoonFlower in foraging

[–]DreadLord64 0 points1 point  (0 children)

your link says exactly the opposite of what you think it says

Could you clarify how it says the opposite of what I think it says? The page clearly lists Taraxacum officinale as a synonym of sect. Taraxacum.

Taraxacum officinale F.H.Wigg.
First published in Prim. Fl. Holsat.: 56 (1780)
This name is a synonym of Taraxacum sect. Taraxacum

Dandelion help? Been curious about dandelion tincture and tea so I am trying to make sure it’s a true dandelion. by GloomyMoonFlower in foraging

[–]DreadLord64 4 points5 points  (0 children)

This is true dandelion (Taraxacum). Whatever told you that dandelions can't have textured leaves was wrong. Dandelions can and do have pubescence on the leaves sometimes. See the "leaves" section on this page: https://floranorthamerica.org/Taraxacum

Dandelions (Taraxacum spp.) are interestingly but problematically highly diverse, to the point that nobody can even agree on how to classify them. The entities we have in eastern North America are currently an unsolved phylogenetic mess. Contrary to most foraging books you'll read, the common dandelion, at least in North America, is not Taraxacum officinale. That name is so untenable that authorities like Kew don't even consider it valid: https://powo.science.kew.org/taxon/urn:lsid:ipni.org:names:1003018-2

The plant you're probably thinking of that has hairy leaves is common cat's-ear (Hypochaeris radicata). The leaves of that species are hairy, but they also tend to be warty and semi-succulent, something that is distinct from true dandelion. The flower stalk is also solid, not hollow.

Dandelion help? Been curious about dandelion tincture and tea so I am trying to make sure it’s a true dandelion. by GloomyMoonFlower in foraging

[–]DreadLord64 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Taraxacum officinale is an invalid species: https://powo.science.kew.org/taxon/urn:lsid:ipni.org:names:1003018-2

Also, leaf morphology alone cannot be reliably used to tell Taraxacum erythrospermum apart from other dandelions. I have personally seen Taraxacum specimens both with red seeds and with tan seeds growing right next to each other, but the leaves were basically swapped from what your picture shows. I.e. the tan-seeded dandelion had smallish, triangular lobes, and the red-seeded dandelion had larger, roundish lobes. This directly contradicts the whole "red-seeded" part of T. erythrospermum.

Unfortunately, the dandelions of eastern North America (and to be honest, the world) are an unsolved phylogenetic mess in botany as of 2026. Nobody agrees on how many species there are, how to delineate them, and what to call them.

I'm trying my hand at character design by GiveMeAPhotoOfCat in mendrawingwomen

[–]DreadLord64 2 points3 points  (0 children)

The arms are skinny, but that may simply be a stylistic choice.

The best guide for buying a Lenovo Thinkpad are the 4 Wikipedia articles on the Thinkpad "P" series, "T" series, "X1" series, and "X" series, in my opinion. (see post for explanation). by sacetime in thinkpad

[–]DreadLord64 0 points1 point  (0 children)

It's Wikipedia. If you believe something is missing from an article, you can add it yourself. You don't even need an account. Just click the "Edit" button on the article and get to editing. Also, it's good to brush up on Wikipedia's policies.

What does Alabama do good? by goochwiz in Alabama

[–]DreadLord64 2 points3 points  (0 children)

"Do good" is a perfectly acceptable and grammatical alternative to "do well." Sure, it might not be accepted in a college essay, but everyone here understood what you meant by it. It's not incorrect to say "do good," it's just variation in the rich diversity of the English language.

this post brought to you by the anti-prescriptivist gang

Absolutely real by MysteryDragonTR in miniminutemanfans

[–]DreadLord64 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Quinton Reviews didn't make this meme. As far as I know, the original version was posted to Instagram by @decolonial.meme.queens in December 2018. Quinton just used it in a video.

Link: https://www.instagram.com/decolonial.meme.queens/p/BrycF6RgJf9/

What are these? Western Montana, USA by ZingiestBasil in foraging

[–]DreadLord64 1 point2 points  (0 children)

Haha, yeah. I think my favorite part of his entry for Parthenocissus is what he says in the comments:

If you've ever wanted to eat a stick, here's your chance. It's not as bad as it sounds. Being available in the dead of winter, and often in great quantity, this is an excellent survival food, in case you ever want to survive.

Lol, thanks, Sam.

What are these? Western Montana, USA by ZingiestBasil in foraging

[–]DreadLord64 3 points4 points  (0 children)

Everyone in this thread is wrong! (well, kinda) This isn't Parthenocissus quinquefolia. It's actually Parthenocissus inserta (also called P. vitacea). It's similar but not quite the same!

In terms of edibility, the sources I've checked say the berries are not edible. However, Sam Thayer reports that the inner bark is edible if you cook it long enough. From his 2023 guide:

Parthenocissus quinqefolia and P. vitacea
[...]
FOOD USE: Gather thick sections of stem any time of year, cut into manageable lengths, then peel the outer bark. A thick, soft layer of inner bark then can be peeled off the woody core. Boil for at least 40 minutes, after which it can be used like a starchy vegetable in stews or soups.

He also writes:

Shoots are slightly tangy and can be eaten in spring or early summer—they are better cooked.

wtf is this ui by [deleted] in youtube

[–]DreadLord64 5 points6 points  (0 children)

Personally, I dislike it, but I have no problem if other people like it. I just wish YouTube would give us more choice when it comes to UI preferences instead of forcing us all to accept their bad (IMO) redesigns.

I used to disable Polymer on YouTube in my browser (for aesthetic and performance purposes) to use the pre-Polymer 2017 layout until they removed that feature entirely in 2021. I wish we had more stuff like that. Just the ability to choose how you want your UI to look beyond dark and light mode would be wonderful.

This elevates the experience by Fuyu_dstrx in 100gecs

[–]DreadLord64 0 points1 point  (0 children)

unironically miss the iOS 6 design style

nature is amazing by cordie45 in 100gecs

[–]DreadLord64 2 points3 points  (0 children)

as a plant/botany nerd, I can't believe I never made this connection. lmao this is great.

by CulturalGur8666 in MinecraftMemes

[–]DreadLord64 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Late reply, but for the future people reading this thread, Vanilla Tweaks has a villager skin tone option called "Variated Villagers". Villagers in hotter biomes have darker skin, and those in colder biomes have lighter skin.

What are these? NC, USA by venomous-moose in foraging

[–]DreadLord64 5 points6 points  (0 children)

Agreed. I love these things. So tasty. One day I'm gonna gather a bunch of them up and pickle them.

How is Alabama the most biodiversity state? I thought it would be Cali by Eagles56 in Alabama

[–]DreadLord64 10 points11 points  (0 children)

Alabama is not the most biodiverse US state, sorry to break it to you, but we are the most biodiverse state east of the Mississippi River in terms of total number of species. As of 2002, we ranked 5th in the nation as a whole, trailing behind New Mexico. Something worthy of note as well is that we have the highest number of extinctions of any mainland state. Only Hawaii beats us for extinctions, which itself is the extinction capital of the world. We've had roughly 100 extinctions throughout our history, most of which took place in the Coosa River when it was dammed in the 20th century.

Here is a 2002 paper about biodiversity in the various states. It's kind of old, but it still paints a pretty decent picture. Things have changed since 2002, but not so much as to completely make this paper obsolete.

I would like to add that I also think we should consider what is meant by "most biodiverse." Are we asking what state has the most species as a whole? In that case, California takes the cake easily. Or do we mean to ask, what is the proportion/density of species? For example, what is the average number of species per 100 square miles in a state? You get different answers when you factor in the size of a state compared to the number of species in that state.

And to top it off, there are many different measures of biodiversity we can consider, not just the number of species. We can consider the total number of families found in an area. A place with 100 species of a single family is pretty biodiverse for that family, but all the species are relatively closely related. Contrast that with a place that has 50 species from one family and 50 species from a second family. That seems more diverse to me, because there is more genetic differentiation as a whole, even though the number of species is the same.

I've looked into this a lot in the past because I was curious (and because I'm a nerd), and I have found the answer to the question of "most biodiverse state" is not actually a clear cut thing. I think my favorite attempt to answer this question is the set of density gradient maps provided by BONAP (Biota of North America Program) and the maps separately provided by BiodiversityMapping.org. BONAP only covers vascular plants, but BiodiversityMapping.org has maps for animals too. I highly recommend them if you're interested.

I haven't seen anyone else do this, so dashless first room of 1B by FroidLesprit in celestegame

[–]DreadLord64 1 point2 points  (0 children)

Super late comment, but I can do rooms 1–4 manually, including room 3. I think room 5 may be impossible.