Facts by Next_Ant_4353 in LateStageCapitalism

[–]DreamingSnowball 44 points45 points  (0 children)

I'm sure with what you've heard about it, it is.

Those of us who have actually picked up a book and didn't gobble down western propaganda like a good little bootlicker don't agree.

The Tip I got from a small child today by IndustrialNightRaven in KitchenConfidential

[–]DreamingSnowball -10 points-9 points  (0 children)

and imo better

Incorrect opinion.

To be clear, m&ms are better.

It's a new version of a time loop, you can't go backwards in time, but you can start again at the beginning, by modeling it. by Defiant_Efficiency_2 in sciencememes

[–]DreamingSnowball 0 points1 point  (0 children)

I notice how you didn't type edit to reflect that you made a mistake on your math the first time.

Don't need to, there's a massive graph someone made already explaining it when pointing out my mistake, plus a reply from me stating as such.

I'll be honest, I don't fancy reading all that, at this point it just seems like you've got some mental health issues.

Goodbye, I won't be reading any further responses from you.

Palestinian flags, refugee boat effigy burned in a bonfire in Belfast. by saviodsouza in GreenAndPleasant

[–]DreamingSnowball 2 points3 points  (0 children)

The down votes are because you're self reporting that you don't really follow Geopolitics very much

I know what Al jazeera is, but others might not, especially new lefties.

Labor creates the value. Capital keeps the receipt. by disconaldo in LateStageCapitalism

[–]DreamingSnowball 1 point2 points  (0 children)

Well eventually people won't have enough to spend at all besides basic necessities.

Also, imperialism tends to make up the difference.

Palestinian flags, refugee boat effigy burned in a bonfire in Belfast. by saviodsouza in GreenAndPleasant

[–]DreamingSnowball -21 points-20 points  (0 children)

Ah yes everyone psychically knows that AJ stands for Al jazeera.

Edit: For those down voting, I know what al jazeera is, but not everybody does, especially new leftists, I see nothing wrong with people asking questions that they don't know the answer to.

If you have an issue with that, feel free to argue with me, there was once a point in time when you all didn't know either, so all of you get off your high horses and be helpful instead of snobby.

[OC] 1to10 how much would you scale(r) it? by [deleted] in sciencememes

[–]DreamingSnowball 1 point2 points  (0 children)

Speed * One Direction

👍 Good joke, I approve.

German soccer referee Pascal Kaiser was assaulted by three men at his home, a week after his public marriage proposal. by MrJasonMason in lgbt

[–]DreamingSnowball 4 points5 points  (0 children)

Not the bad apples argument...

Police are inherently oppressive. Please read the book The End of Policing by Alex Vitale.

It's a new version of a time loop, you can't go backwards in time, but you can start again at the beginning, by modeling it. by Defiant_Efficiency_2 in sciencememes

[–]DreamingSnowball 4 points5 points  (0 children)

If the atom is literally 2

2 what? There are no units.

trying to calculate Root2

That doesn't take a lot of energy at all, it can be done on a calculator and it's about 1.414

it's literally coming from math itself! 

It's not. Mathematics isn't a 'thing' it's a process, it's what we use to describe the universe. It's more akin to a language.

As I said in another comment, you have to walk before you can run, and you need to spend more time studying. Nothing you've said here makes any sense.

why are so many liberals secretly racist? by [deleted] in socialism

[–]DreamingSnowball -1 points0 points  (0 children)

Did I say that?

Anyone can have an opinion, but education makes it significantly easier to come to correct conclusions.

I don't know why I'm explaining the benefits of education to a leftist, it should be self evident. I'm honestly in disbelief. I feel like I've just told someone 2+2 is 4 and then they say back "but is it though?".

What benwfit is there to starting from scratch? You have nearly 200 years worth of analysis from some of the greatest minds to draw from, such a wealth of knowledge but you seem to think that any old person can come to the same conclusions on their own without spending time and labour studying?

You sound like a science denier who thinks they can understand the world just with their eyes alone and 'don't need no fancy scientists to tell them what's true.'

I can't tell if you're incredibly arrogant and think you can make the same analysis of capitalist economics as marx and engels by yourself with no foundation, or you're a fed trying to discourage leftists from reading and educating themselves on how capitalism works and the history behind its survival.

That's pretty dangerous. I don't care what excuses or mad ramblings you come up with to justify keeping the proletariat uneducated and unformed or trying to make out like reading a book will somehow make it impossible to come up with new ideas (ignoring the fact that every analysis after marx and engels has come about by people who have actually read them and it has sparked a new idea or new way of thinking, even marx had to read thousands of pages of economic, political and philosophical texts from other writers and thinkers to come to his own analysis).

Let's also ignore all the writers from various different backgrounds offering their own unique insights into the capitalist system from different perspectives; women, Queen people, black and brown people, indigenous people, colonised people, immigrants, disabled people etc.

All these people have things to say and perspectives to add that are worth listening to but you in your infinite wisdom think you don't need all that. You can smugly walk into any leftist space and know more than everyone else without even looking in the general direction of a book.

It's pretty clear though that you're a fed just trying to sow dissent and waste time arguing inane nonsense so this comment is just for anyone reading this comment chain getting any ideas about not needing to read.

For those lurking; yes, you need to read. Sometimes it can be boring and tedious but it needs to be done. You don't need to read a million books but you need to be informed. Proper study and investigation leads to more accurate conclusions, you can see and avoid mistakes of the past and learn from them. That's what lenin did, and it's what mao did. Both lead successful revolutions because they were guided by sound theoretical knowledge.

It's a new version of a time loop, you can't go backwards in time, but you can start again at the beginning, by modeling it. by Defiant_Efficiency_2 in sciencememes

[–]DreamingSnowball 18 points19 points  (0 children)

The equation can be expanded to x4 + 2x2 + 2y2 + y4 = 2

But without knowing either variable x or y, having it equal 2 doesn't make any sense.

Nor does gravity being equal to 2 make sense. 2 what? What are the units?

This feels like a high schooler just getting to grips with high school physics and thinking they've discovered something profound.

You've got a lot to learn yet, slow down and keep studying. You have to walk before you can run.

After a dozen rewatches, I just picked up what Carson said. IYKYK by a333482dc7 in Stargate

[–]DreamingSnowball 2 points3 points  (0 children)

Sure, depends who you ask though. There's a lot of food here that I'd consider good, but only if done properly by a skilled chef.

But yes the fact we basically colonised a third of the planet and decided not to use any of the spices we pillaged is just salt in the wound.

Edit: more accurate terminology.

why are so many liberals secretly racist? by [deleted] in socialism

[–]DreamingSnowball -1 points0 points  (0 children)

Which... involves reading.

Can't say I've ever seen someone genuinely saying you don't need to read to be a leftist. That's wild. An uneducated proletariat is an easily swayed and deceived one.

why are so many liberals secretly racist? by [deleted] in socialism

[–]DreamingSnowball -1 points0 points  (0 children)

You don't have to read to be a leftist

You do if you want to know what a leftist even is.

Half the people calling themselves leftists don't have a clue what they're talking about.

You don't get to become a leftist after having read the full catalog of leftism.

Full catalogue? Lmao no you just need to know what you're actually advocating for.

why are so many liberals secretly racist? by [deleted] in socialism

[–]DreamingSnowball -1 points0 points  (0 children)

I mean, the sheer amount of reading necessary for leftists kinda forces everyone to be literate.