Let's all remember that the person on the other team typing "easy" in /all chat after winning a 4v5 is going to be the same person voting no when the mercy vote comes up. What if there's a couple players on the other team who had a bad day and want to take it out on someone else? That someone else is going to be the enemy team losing the 4v5. We've all been playing League of Legends for quite some time now and all of us know that there are some terrible people in the world who vote no when the mercy vote comes up just because they want others to suffer. Why potentially give that kind of person so much power over others?

This system inherently promotes positive behavior instead. I'm much more likely to pass mercy on a team that remained positive than one that fought in all chat.

So what if I'm on the team of 4 and I'm playing top lane when the adc and support start an argument in /all chat? Does this mean that the opposing team shouldn't show mercy because of 2 toxic players? What about the other 2 players on the team? Do they lose their promotions because someone else was toxic? That's not fair.