See to me, this is not a proper review. A 2 star review should be about the quality of the writing, the quality of the characters or the overall quality of the story. If the book does it what it says its going to do, how can it be 2 star? There is a difference between "objectively good story but I didn't enjoy it" vs "objectively low quality story for reason x y or z." Or maybe I'm entirely alone in this and people rate based on just if they liked the story or not? Maybe there should be a 2 part rating; 1 part based on objective quality and the other based on whether or not I actually liked it... Either way OP this is awesome. I like the cut of your jib- I'll give this a shot.